Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
dcbadacd
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
9 ms
·
61.
▲
by
dcbadacd
7y ago
Linux uses GPL, it kind-of forces the tit-for-tat relationship.
62.
▲
by
dcbadacd
7y ago
Disabling != deleting.
63.
▲
by
dcbadacd
7y ago
To keep their walled garden, they say "for security" of course.
64.
▲
by
dcbadacd
7y ago
There's quite a few "fun" OpenCart issues listed here whoever is interested: https://github.com/nikolas/github-drama The dev is indeed really incompetent for behaving like that.
65.
▲
by
dcbadacd
7y ago
We have the Do-Not-Track header that should be interpreted as a denial to all cookie notices and GDPR requests but they didn't write that into the law.
66.
▲
by
dcbadacd
7y ago
Can be revoked at any time as well as request all the data they've aquired about you and it's deletion.
67.
▲
by
dcbadacd
7y ago
Assuming GitHub is willing to show you the graph, for some projects it isn't.
68.
▲
by
dcbadacd
7y ago
Private trackers are just mostly ran by power-hungry people with basically 0 benefit to the regular person.
69.
▲
by
dcbadacd
7y ago
I'd rather make it as hard as possible for any adtech to track me, a "standard" is the worst that can happen.
70.
▲
by
dcbadacd
7y ago
I'm actually not very familiar with it, other than it's meant for more real-time stuff and it supports a lot of different platforms. I'd love someone comparing that is actually educated on the topic (computer graphics) :P
71.
▲
by
dcbadacd
7y ago
I would have loved if they had named the article "Moon shakes, geologists are shaken".
72.
▲
by
dcbadacd
7y ago
How does this compare to magnum.graphics?
73.
▲
by
dcbadacd
7y ago
They aren't strictly "protocol issues" though, they're just dangerous features that are good to be limited in most cases.
74.
▲
by
dcbadacd
7y ago
As I have said, it would very least avoid spam looking real from real domains, which is half of the issue. The throwaway part could be fixed by making spam illegal and actually cracking down on it.
75.
▲
by
dcbadacd
7y ago
Spam could be half-fixed with forcing DKIM, SPF, DMARC and TLS. The very least there would be no impersonation of other domain names (filtering the rest into a spam box will become much easier after that) and insecure transportation then.
76.
▲
by
dcbadacd
7y ago
SMTP is nowadays quite protectable against real domains being used by someone else. SPF, DKIM and DMARC all tremendously help. However, Microsoft has a patent that stops a few additional measures from being taken against certain spoofings (
77.
▲
by
dcbadacd
7y ago
Actually E-mail has things such as DMARC, DKIM and SPF that tremendously cut down scam looking real from certain domains. Another topic is just direct scam from new domain names but that's not what OP and you're talking about.
78.
▲
by
dcbadacd
7y ago
I've had the same number for like 14 years now and I haven't gotten a single(!) robocall. So I share your experience.
79.
▲
by
dcbadacd
7y ago
There's a difference between changing results (or adding) and not supporting a feature that is dangerous and rarely used. Kind-of like banning handguns vs. providing unknownly modified guns.
80.
▲
by
dcbadacd
7y ago
I really wish they (PopCap) did the same with Plants vs. Zombies 1.
81.
▲
by
dcbadacd
7y ago
There was (is?) a WoG modding site that contained a lot of new levels.
82.
▲
by
dcbadacd
7y ago
A regular keylogger won't no longer work with a hardware token for example. Yes, having your PC compromised is bad but it would be even worse if the keys can be stolen and used elsewhere, it just rises the bar significantly for getting
83.
▲
by
dcbadacd
7y ago
I wonder if Estonian ID card can be used for S/MIME? Anyone knows? EDIT: Yep, Estonia gives every citizen an ID card that can in theory do S/MIME as well, though I haven't just seen any good implementations of that: https:&#
84.
▲
by
dcbadacd
7y ago
Past malpractice shouldn't be the reason for no future improvement. It's simply the time to relearn.
85.
▲
by
dcbadacd
7y ago
I don't see pieces of metal being possible to ban. Even a pizza pan would do.
86.
▲
by
dcbadacd
7y ago
Which raises the question, has someone maybe hidden something like this somewhere already on the earth?
87.
▲
by
dcbadacd
7y ago
Teamcity?
88.
▲
by
dcbadacd
7y ago
Heavily depends on your target market, neither does it just hurt to say "This browser is unsupported for being too outdated" we do it for <noscript> why not <nopropercss> :/
89.
▲
by
dcbadacd
7y ago
I just last week said to someone that Google has dementia. Turns out it's really not just me who thinks that.
90.
▲
by
dcbadacd
7y ago
I'm not sure how that's going to work a single person not of the average height, are they saying tall people have to just stand without support and short people get ass-stabbed by the seat?
More ›