dbsights

8 ms·

31.
by dbsights 4y ago
Come on, the choice isn't just between conservation and blackouts.. This is only an issue because we sacrificed the reliability of the power grid for 'green' technologies. Forget enforced conservation or blackouts, I choose a
32.
by dbsights 4y ago
Russia is very different from Italy, they have local production of almost all goods. I think you're right that a western country that was cut off like Russia would have failed as you predict. That Russia hasn't should tell you t
33.
by dbsights 4y ago
.. and your dick. Raising NO is the mechanism of action for Viagra.
34.
by dbsights 4y ago
Same reason we should have had a problem with it then. If racism is wrong, then it shouldn't matter which race.
35.
by dbsights 4y ago
What about his post was hostile? Your post, a baseless attack, is hostile.
36.
by dbsights 4y ago
Looks like those buyers are reconsidering it's value too. HODL? Illogical unless you believe there is some underlying value. Otherwise there will be bagholders and all you've accomplished is to guarantee you'll be among them
37.
by dbsights 4y ago
I'll admit I got to the same phrase and violently closed the tab. Something about newspeak revolts me, once I see the "message" promulgated, I just cant take the author seriously anymore.
38.
by dbsights 5y ago
Come on, this isn't true. Even with delta the waning efficacy had become obvious in those countries that vaccinated early, with all time high infections in jurisdictions that were virtually completely vaccinated (e.g. Israel, Waterfor
39.
by dbsights 5y ago
>Again, note the juxtaposition. These 477 patients who reported COVID-19 symptoms but never received nasal swabs were across the entire trial of well over 40,000 subjects, but the way it’s phrased, not put into context of the size of the
40.
by dbsights 5y ago
I can't believe natural immunity was ever in doubt. Is there a single disease for which natural immunity is not superior to acquired (via vaccine) immunity? I can't find one.
41.
by dbsights 6y ago
"Agree with me or you're guilty too". Those challenges were defeated on procedural grounds, not because of a lack of evidence. The investigations of the 2016 election were started for less.
42.
by dbsights 6y ago
You're begging the question by calling it a "free and fair election". The dissent is whether that is actually the case. And if it is not, then the eradication of that dissent is terrifying.
43.
by dbsights 6y ago
>We detected coronavirus in respiratory droplets and aerosols in 3 of 10 (30%) and 4 of 10 (40%) of the samples collected without face masks, respectively, but did not detect any virus in respiratory droplets or aerosols collected from p
44.
by dbsights 6y ago
This is not taking advantage of a disaster (taking advantage of people's suffering), this is supply and demand. Supposedly, Tesla's are in high demand and as a 'luxury' good they could charge as much as they wished with
45.
by dbsights 6y ago
It's too easy to confuse ideas and provably false statements. Many things we hold to be absolutely true may not be so, this has happened with many 'truths' through history, and it would be incredibly arrogant to believe that
46.
by dbsights 6y ago
This is the reason I can't stand zig: its so aggressively opinionated about something that doesn't matter at all.
47.
by dbsights 7y ago
Except stocks and bonds are correlated now. So that strategy just, doesn't work any more
48.
by dbsights 7y ago
about 99.7%? I've always hated the argument of this book: yes the markets are chaotic and short term movements appear random, but the appearance of being random is not equivalent to being caused by a random process. The book makes a b
49.
by dbsights 7y ago
All trades are zero-sum. For any price change in a stock, the money made by one party is equal to the money that could have been made by the other. Given the choice to either buy now or buy later, if the price appreciates, buying later is