dbranes

18 ms·

31.
by dbranes 9y ago
Well that question only makes sense for connected graphs, we don't really know whether this is connected. So in general a version of this question that makes sense is, among all the connected components of the wikipedia graph, what is
32.
by dbranes 9y ago
Ah okay right this is the answer. Previous approaches [1] are deep generative models that you have to optimize for each input, whereas here you run just a forward evaluation on a model that you've trained beforehand. I would still argu
33.
by dbranes 9y ago
Not sure if I understand, don't every neural network ever produce some approximation in finite time? In what sense is this approach "closed-form"?
34.
by dbranes 9y ago
I'm probably missing something obvious here, maybe someone can explain the following to me. - Their approach is a composition of 2 steps, what they call "stylization" and "smoothing". - Top left of 2nd page they cla
35.
Submanifolds of constant entanglement entropy(physics.stackexchange.com)
1 points by dbranes 9y ago|0 comments
36.
by dbranes 9y ago
Genuinely curious, as a non-designer, I don't understand what this offers over existing palettes websites [1]. Anyone care to enlighten? [1] e.g. http://www.colourlovers.com/ , http://www.color-hex.com/c
37.
by dbranes 9y ago
Adding to the other reply pointing out this is quite fundamental work, the point of these articles isn't really to announce new breakthroughs that happened last week, but rather to sketch major research themes that's been going on
38.
by dbranes 9y ago
I like this because it describes fully and precisely the structure of an LSTM cell, in a way which mostly avoids ML/stats jargon. From this article I can correctly and easily read off the model architecture it describes, as a compositi
39.
by dbranes 9y ago
Good point!
40.
by dbranes 9y ago
A related remark: there is another (rather silly) way to "geometrize linear algebra". It goes something like whenever you see a ring R, think of it as the sheaf of functions (the structure sheaf) on some space. Whenever you see a
41.
by dbranes 9y ago
I don't want to doubt the potential usefulness of the linked article to certain audiences, but I wanted to point out the following: It's important to acknowledge that intuition from rotations etc. are crutches, and not substitutes
42.
Kan makes nLab entries look like book chapters(sites.google.com)
1 points by dbranes 9y ago|0 comments
43.
by dbranes 9y ago
Relevant fact for context: the Pixel 2 shipped with a built-in music identification feature. https://venturebeat.com/2017/10/19/how-googles-pixel-2-now-p...
44.
by dbranes 9y ago
The following of course is a comment on the quote not on your comment, but no Kochen Specker is not a generalization of EPR to 3 particles. It's easy to come up with a generalization of EPR in 3 particles - just exhibit a 3-party entan
45.
by dbranes 9y ago
Unfortunately it's failing on first things I tried with a not-so-helpful error message: https://www.arxiv-vanity.com/papers/1608.04012/ https://www.arxiv-vanity.com/papers/0903.3065/
46.
by dbranes 9y ago
This is great. It's essentially asking you to work in a 2-category[1], which, once you get used to it, is an amazingly intuitive way to make sense of constructions in ordinary 1-categories. [1] https://ncatlab.org/nlab&#
47.
by dbranes 9y ago
Note an open source alternative is superset[1] (formerly Panoramix/caravel by airbnb) [1]( https://github.com/apache/incubator-superset )
48.
Newtonian Mechanics from Categories Fibered in Groupoids(physics.stackexchange.com)
2 points by dbranes 9y ago|0 comments
49.
by dbranes 9y ago
The diagramming tools look promising, great work! I never felt like I needed a WYSIWYG for Latex. But I deifnitely need a WYSIWYG for tikz[0]. For example, the tikz code for a simple diagram [1] is essentially incomprehensible. So in light
50.
by dbranes 9y ago
One of my current favorite things: categorification of linear algebra via higher category theory: https://qchu.wordpress.com/2016/05/31/higher-linear-algebra/
51.
No, covariant and contravariant derivatives dont “commute”(physics.stackexchange.com)
2 points by dbranes 9y ago|0 comments
52.
by dbranes 9y ago
Not gonna describe what dynamics is because that's a broad question best answered by some googling. Will comment on the more restricted question "why do we like 1-parameter families". 1-parameter families of objects usually a
53.
by dbranes 9y ago
Can you remove my comment altogether? It's getting downvotes because in light of you cleaning up the rest of this thread my comment here is no longer relevant.
54.
by dbranes 9y ago
It's immensely disappointing that this comment section has has an abundance of comments on iranian socio-political issues, while completely devoid of any discussion on dynamics on moduli spaces.
55.
by dbranes 9y ago
Curtis McMullen describes Mirzakhani's prize-winning work here http://www.math.harvard.edu/~ctm/papers/home/text/papers/icm... and as a talk at 2014 ICM https://www.youtube.com/
56.
by dbranes 9y ago
Great suggestion & definitely something I was thinking about, will put on the roadmap. I hacked this up for my own use on my 3840 x 2160 display, and the philosophy is will add fancier features & customizations only if there is inte
57.
by dbranes 9y ago
Not seeing how this is relevant. The tool linked here just helps you manage how much space different windows take up on your screen, it doesn't really care about how you open these windows.
58.
Show HN: Grid-based window tiling for X11 with powerful keyboard controls(github.com)
69 points by dbranes 9y ago|45 comments
59.
by dbranes 9y ago
For those unfamiliar with homomorphic encryption, I found this to be a good algebraic treatment. https://web.wpi.edu/Pubs/E-project/Available/E-project-04261...
60.
Greg Moore: Berry phase depends on choice of Hilbert bundle connection(arxiv.org)
2 points by dbranes 9y ago|0 comments

More ›