Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
dboreham
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
7 ms
·
91.
▲
by
dboreham
2mo ago
Oh dear. They make those statements for the benefit of people who don't own small businesses, but are "low information voters".
92.
▲
by
dboreham
2mo ago
In some cases they are provided healthcare services without a choice, so they're not really "consuming" those services. E.g. tests that don't change outcome but do cover a provider from a legal risk.
93.
▲
by
dboreham
2mo ago
Ok but it doesn't save the donor class anything, so it won't happen.
94.
▲
by
dboreham
2mo ago
There was some work to address this issue with federation in Gitea, but I haven't kept up with how well that went. Our practical solution was to just mirror our Gitea repos into GitHub. That way they're discoverable, releases can
95.
▲
by
dboreham
2mo ago
Agreed. GitHub Actions feels like someone's science project created while on a mushroom trip. Really you just want a thing that executes a shell script in a runner.
96.
▲
by
dboreham
2mo ago
The error rate is 100% on the service that allows you to create PRs in the web site. Actual remote git service is working just fine. I might try the API to make a PR, see if that's working. Update: yes that worked. gh CLI using the API
97.
▲
by
dboreham
2mo ago
Funny because I spent a couple of years on self-hosted Gitea, including doing some work on Gitea itself to add features we wanted. Then I changed projects and thought "well that was a lot of work, let's just do what everyone does
98.
▲
by
dboreham
2mo ago
My understanding is that 90% of what companies processing payments do is: fraud prevention and regulatory compliance.
99.
▲
by
dboreham
2mo ago
I don't know what happened in this situation but beware that CF and similar providers are not true DNS hosting providers. They do DNS, but only so their CDN stuff works, and to lock their customers from using whatever DNS hosting they
100.
▲
by
dboreham
2mo ago
Not really a day of rest since you have to go to <place of worship>
101.
▲
by
dboreham
2mo ago
Hence the dowager said "What's a weekend?"
102.
▲
by
dboreham
2mo ago
I thought that's what "legacy weather simulation code" was!
103.
▲
by
dboreham
2mo ago
Something like this is used to design speakers (and countless other things).
104.
▲
by
dboreham
2mo ago
Following tradition the message has to be video of a fascist rally.
105.
▲
by
dboreham
2mo ago
Surely ironic and the book is "Contact".
106.
▲
by
dboreham
2mo ago
I prefer to avoid its internal magic mechanisms. The LLM can read documents like a human (actually better since...no ADD) so I ask it to create documents. This also has the benefit that you can change to a different AI tool and the informat
107.
▲
by
dboreham
2mo ago
Watch it along with "The Conversation", from the same era. Watch "Breakdown: 1975" for the context..
108.
▲
by
dboreham
2mo ago
I worked for a human for a while who complained the same way. Problem was: it was a religion for him, not based in any reasonable logic. The large PRs needed to be large because they were adding features that couldn't be half-pregnant.
109.
▲
by
dboreham
2mo ago
Feels fine to me.
110.
▲
by
dboreham
2mo ago
Probably should buy three, and put them in places far enough apart that an earthquake or large fire won't get all of them at once.
111.
▲
by
dboreham
2mo ago
The Pirate Code.
112.
▲
by
dboreham
2mo ago
Quick note that data corruption bugs that are impossible to reproduce are not uncommon (perhaps they're the norm). So some amount of head scratching trying to figure out a plausible scenario by which the system could get into the state
113.
▲
by
dboreham
2mo ago
Sad to hear. Met him a few times. The company I worked for and his (Perihelion) partnered on a few projects.
114.
▲
by
dboreham
2mo ago
Therefore Einstein couldn't have had the idea of relativity because it wasn't in his training data. Joking aside, the reality is that a pre-Einstein in 1850 couldn't have had the idea of relativity because Maxwell wasn't
115.
▲
by
dboreham
2mo ago
The whole point of the encrypted payload returned to the client for future re-submission would be that they don't log.
116.
▲
by
dboreham
2mo ago
I guess someone forgot to salt the encryption scheme with a meakness factor.
117.
▲
by
dboreham
2mo ago
Hmm, ok. So the attack doesn't involve decrypting the payload, only getting the server to do so. Since a model will do that if you just ask, what's so special about the attack?
118.
▲
by
dboreham
2mo ago
Can someone tell us how they were able to decrypt the encrypted payload? The article says they inserted the cyphertext into a session with a different model. Ok, but how does that allow you to decrypt it?
119.
▲
by
dboreham
2mo ago
Which is fine but this thread is about a feature that provides hypervisor isolation, not cgroups.
120.
▲
by
dboreham
2mo ago
I think you have your answer right there.
More ›