dbgrman

4 ms·

31.
by dbgrman 5mo ago
also, could the website plz fix its scrolling code? its annoying. i can't read the article
32.
by dbgrman 5mo ago
LOL! Perfect. one change request: brighter should be more intense. Right now the more intense days are dark red and to a color blind person like me, that doesn't pop out.
33.
by dbgrman 5mo ago
Bitzscaling. Reid Hoffman's snake oil (thought piece). https://www.blitzscaling.com/ It has poisoned more than one company (especially startups). Its the "go big or go home" mentality. The "the market is
34.
by dbgrman 5mo ago
knowing sama, that's exactly what he would do. except, the story wouldn't end with openai collaborating with a competitor who is better than them, openai will collaborate with them to ensure they're destroyed from inside out
35.
by dbgrman 5mo ago
When a company writes down principles, you should be highly skeptical. - Democratization. Why is it your prerogative sam bro? In other words, what he means is consolidate access so "We" can democratize. We choose who gets what. -
36.
by dbgrman 5mo ago
TIL ppl have domains that make $9k/yr and here i am being happy my niche app is bringing me $200/mo revenue
37.
by dbgrman 6mo ago
They’re trying that with meta compute
38.
by dbgrman 6mo ago
20% is the outlook for the whole year. Wait and see :)
39.
by dbgrman 6mo ago
I am sorry but people going and wanting to go back to meta after being laid off is exactly why Meta keeps getting away with it. I am in some ex-meta groups and people tell they got laid off and in the same sentence ask how/when can the
40.
by dbgrman 6mo ago
Not just bloated, obese. These companies have an eating disorder. They can longer control it. Even after all the layoffs meta gained net weight in 2025.
41.
by dbgrman 6mo ago
its not a 'concerted campaign'. meta laid off 4300 in 2025, but by the end of the year was actaully ~4800 higher than before. If that is not 'over hiring', i dont know what is. The headcount went from 74K in dec2024 to 7
42.
by dbgrman 6mo ago
I agree with that sentiment. Most discourse around AI is shallow. There are people who do have a rather profound world view on this and sometimes it surfaces on hackernews. Karpathy for instance is very pragmatic but also philosophical at t
43.
by dbgrman 6mo ago
Why though? It is the technology of today's times. 70s had microprocessors, 80s had languages and tools, 90s was about the internet, 00s was about e-commerce and then web2.0 and later iPhone, mobile/local/social, 15s-20s was
44.
by dbgrman 6mo ago
“ That's why all the work we do in growth is justified. All the questionable contact importing practices. All the subtle language that helps people stay searchable by friends. All of the work we do bring more communication in. The work
45.
by dbgrman 6mo ago
Because ends justify means. To quote Boz himself: “ The ugly truth is that we believe in connecting people so deeply that anything that allows us to connect more people more often is de facto good. It is perhaps the only area where the me
46.
by dbgrman 6mo ago
not enough.
47.
by dbgrman 6mo ago
After all the layoffs, labeling people as underperformers while laying off, etc. can they stoop any lower? Why TF would anyone in their right mind would want to join this company?
48.
by dbgrman 6mo ago
The answer to your question has less to do with "vibe coding," "harness," and all the jargon and "productivity guru speak." It is akin to asking, "How do you get a runner's high when running in the Ni
49.
by dbgrman 6mo ago
But isn't this capitulation? If you're not there raising your voice, who will? I know it sounds like a hopeless situation, but with consistent activism, I believe things can and will change.
50.
by dbgrman 6mo ago
Given llama 4 mucked up benchmark numbers, I’d take spark announcement with a many grains of salt.
51.
by dbgrman 6mo ago
I wonder if Zuck will ever internalize that the words ‘personal’ and ‘meta’ will not be taken seriously together for another decade (if they don’t make another gaff).
52.
by dbgrman 6mo ago
Last i checked with friends at meta they are pretty deeply invested in using claude for coding etc. anthropic has nothing to be scared of at MSL. If spark beats opus 4.6, why is meta wasting money on opus internally?
53.
by dbgrman 6mo ago
Litmus test: what % of meta engineers are using muse vs Claude code? Last i heard it was mostly claude code. Tell you everything you need to know about how serious these benchmarks are.
54.
by dbgrman 6mo ago
Extremely fascinating and a relatable DIY system. I love the analogy to dashboards.
55.
by dbgrman 6mo ago
Too many disparate thoughts in this writing but i admire the sentiment. VR was fraught with problems from the get go and even if we imagine a perfect technology, its a solution looking for a problem at best. I don’t know if that is the same
56.
by dbgrman 7mo ago
Cool stuff. would be nice to have a color blind mode. I literally can't distinguish the red from green in this visualization.
57.
by dbgrman 7mo ago
This is amazing for getting new team members onboarded with Claude Code processes and tools I use. Thanks for working on it. will give it a try tonight.
58.
by dbgrman 7mo ago
Love the product. Have you considered implementing panes and windows that work with tmux’s CC mode? Any considerations specifically for claude code or agentic terminal users?
59.
by dbgrman 7mo ago
i hope they implement something that can be used with tmux -CC mode.
60.
by dbgrman 8mo ago
100%. Love this approach by Anthropic. The Meta "monetization league" is assembling at OpenAI and doing what they've done best at Meta. However, I do think we need to take Anthropic's word with a grain of salt, too. To s

More ›