dbdjfjrjvebd

13 ms·

91.
by dbdjfjrjvebd 8y ago
There is a simple way to have both. Give people the right to anonymity and also give them personally the right to wave that right. This protects people both ways.
92.
by dbdjfjrjvebd 8y ago
Spilling something is an accident. Other things can be mistakes but not accidents.
93.
by dbdjfjrjvebd 8y ago
I think its legally required in many places. In others it is about not being sued. And for all kitchen staff it is fairly important not to poison people!
94.
by dbdjfjrjvebd 8y ago
I agree the idea that a defence contractor might be working together with the Pentagon is totally preposterous. </sarcasm>
95.
by dbdjfjrjvebd 8y ago
The developer gets paid partly by the adverts. Getting paid is integral to my job satisfaction... I actually don't work on any ad supported products. That improves my job satisfaction even more.
96.
by dbdjfjrjvebd 8y ago
Except that the DMCA troll just repeats the takedown notice. What should happen is that a lawyer making fraudulent DMCA notices should be held liable.
97.
by dbdjfjrjvebd 8y ago
On pass by reference.. I really miss Fortran's intent(in). You get a reference to the data but it is immutable... I would like if Python had something similar...
98.
by dbdjfjrjvebd 8y ago
In short no. a.com does not match b.a.com Only if the certificate is *.a.com does it match b.a.com b.a.com can have its own certificate.
99.
by dbdjfjrjvebd 8y ago
Unless there is no opt out.. Unless the data is for core functionality, a lawful purpose you have to have consent. I would consult a lawyer on this if you have any doubts. I suspect Microsoft have done already though.
100.
by dbdjfjrjvebd 8y ago
Ignorant/mistaken good intentions can do great harm. The difference comes when someone is told that they are doing harm. Do they stop or carry on?
101.
by dbdjfjrjvebd 8y ago
> the entire industry are sold itself to GraphQL. Which industry? I presume you don't mean software development which has largely ignored graphQL? BTW I speak as an early adopter who has used graphQL in production.
102.
by dbdjfjrjvebd 8y ago
Hence "a lot" which allows for other processes. We agree.
103.
by dbdjfjrjvebd 8y ago
You could apply a tarrif on the licensing fees? This might upset the WTO.
104.
by dbdjfjrjvebd 8y ago
Yes but a lot of that is done by allowing large companies to offshore their profits.
105.
by dbdjfjrjvebd 8y ago
Did you not know that the old Firefox had much more functional vim emulation add ons?
106.
by dbdjfjrjvebd 8y ago
Fine. BUT sites should be responsible for the ads running on their site and held financially or criminally responsible. Adtech is infested with intrusive tracking which is legally dubious in my jurisdiction. To say nothing of the security i
107.
by dbdjfjrjvebd 8y ago
The main point is auditability. Closed source libraries can have errors that can't be audited by the scientific community.
108.
by dbdjfjrjvebd 8y ago
My customers want their customers to have a good experience and to feel safe and secure. They want to follow the law. They also want analytics. By following a standard that complies with the law here in Europe they get some of both.
109.
by dbdjfjrjvebd 8y ago
I mean that I am knowledgable about Python builds. You are knowledgable about Golang. Neither skill is special. With Docker I don't need to learn as much about FooLang's build process to contribute to a project using FooLang.
110.
by dbdjfjrjvebd 8y ago
I can build any python project in 10 mimutes (and not pollute my global environment). I can't do that with Go or C or C++ or Ruby or php. I can if they are dockerised.
111.
by dbdjfjrjvebd 8y ago
You are prepared to make compromises which we know threaten democracy. Things like secret ballets are not a lofty ideal but a fundamental component of an election. Non secret ballets instantly compromise an election's integrity. Please
112.
by dbdjfjrjvebd 8y ago
The OP says app delivery but they actually talk about development builds. Dev builds are another area where Docker/containerisation helps. Dev builds are just as annoying with Golang as Ruby or Python. In fact build awkwardness is orth
113.
by dbdjfjrjvebd 8y ago
The technology to do this in an acceptable manner does not exist.
114.
by dbdjfjrjvebd 8y ago
"We" have no idea how to build a secure electronic voting system to decide who the next government will be. NB in an election of a government there is no central trust store. And everyone (including your grandad and thick cousin)
115.
by dbdjfjrjvebd 8y ago
And this is how to retain users. Although you might struggle to sell support contracts with preferential access to bug fixes...
116.
by dbdjfjrjvebd 8y ago
This is a good way to increase your churn. If your product has known bugs affecting my workflow that I have reported and you have not even responded to (a valid response could include instructions for preparing a patch/PR or even a mes
117.
by dbdjfjrjvebd 8y ago
And people are quite OK to trust these. In these cases there is a central authority from which trust can be established. Voting is the opposite. During voting the central authority is being changed by the man on the street. He therefore nee