dbbk

27 ms·

1. 151.▲
   by dbbk 3mo ago

   I was a bit confused what this adds other than just standard CDN-Cache-Control page caching that we do now. Some quirks I've found; - You still get billed per request, whether the request hits cache or not (but don't get billed fo
2. 152.▲
   by dbbk 3mo ago

   The copy paste approach is just a plain bad idea, I am not sure why this doesn't get more criticism
3. 153.▲
   by dbbk 3mo ago

   It's so staccato throughout, a human wouldn't write like this.
4. 154.▲
   by dbbk 3mo ago

   You probably shouldn't unless you're doing hardcore cybersecurity
5. 155.▲
   by dbbk 3mo ago

   Oh come on Opus is perfectly good enough for any coding task. You will barely notice when it drops down from Fable.
6. 156.▲
   by dbbk 4mo ago

   This isn't immediate though, it's from August
7. 157.▲
   by dbbk 4mo ago

   Yeah even Claude Cowork would do this, doesn't need "computer use"
8. 158.▲
   by dbbk 4mo ago

   > And yet having an agent able yo use a computer on your behalf is really useful. I honestly cannot think of a single use case
9. 159.▲
   by dbbk 4mo ago

   I would say their Codex product is probably better, I just don't use it because I prefer Opus
10. 160.▲
    by dbbk 4mo ago

    Dispatch... Remote Control... it's baffling
11. 161.▲
    by dbbk 4mo ago

    No, their products are just janky and unreliable. Have you tried using their cloud environments for Claude Code? They're unusable, and I'm not choosing that word lightly. There are even blatant UX issues in the consumer Claude app
12. 162.▲
    by dbbk 4mo ago

    > This is going to be amazing for things like PR previews and code review. Being able to deploy a preview to a working URL for free is a huge reduction in friction. Uh that's already true?
13. 163.▲
    by dbbk 4mo ago

    Vercel achieved it perfectly fine
14. 164.▲
    by dbbk 4mo ago

    "Traditional E2E tests are slow to set up and expensive to maintain." I don't really understand this. If I'm already using Opus to write the code, surely it would know best what E2E tests to write to be able to verify it
15. 165.▲
    by dbbk 4mo ago

    It's a very different way of implementing ad blocking yes but it still works for 99% of the old use cases. Chrome "closing the door on ad blockers" is just blatantly not the case and over-exaggerating.
16. 166.▲
    by dbbk 4mo ago

    I think you are overthinking it. If Chrome actually wanted to ban ad blockers they could just do it.
17. 167.▲
    by dbbk 4mo ago

    Ad blockers work fine when upgraded to the new extension spec
18. 168.▲
    by dbbk 4mo ago

    Ad blockers work fine when they are upgraded to extension manifest v3
19. 169.▲
    by dbbk 4mo ago

    Interestingly I had a pleasant experience with Vercel's AI support recently. I challenged a charge I shouldn't have had, it self-diagnosed to confirm that the invoice had been generated incorrectly, and actioned a refund! No human
20. 170.▲
    by dbbk 4mo ago

    If I have a fully maxed out MacBook Pro, would it make sense to just switch from Opus 4.8 to this? I've never tried running local models for coding...
21. 171.▲
    by dbbk 4mo ago

    I don't really understand these deals in the "AI is scary and can build anything" world. OpenAI certainly could have just built this themselves? It's not like they're buying the customer base.
22. 172.▲
    by dbbk 4mo ago

    What? No
23. 173.▲
    by dbbk 4mo ago

    This is what tests are for.
24. 174.▲
    by dbbk 4mo ago

    What is evil about this?
25. 175.▲
    by dbbk 4mo ago

    Except, it does tell you.
26. 176.▲
    by dbbk 4mo ago

    I can't help you
27. 177.▲
    by dbbk 4mo ago

    Read it again
28. 178.▲
    by dbbk 4mo ago

    Yes
29. 179.▲
    by dbbk 4mo ago

    Private Cloud Compute is audited by independent third parties to verify it.
30. 180.▲
    by dbbk 4mo ago

    Apple wrote a whole press release explaining it: https://www.apple.com/newsroom/2026/06/due-to-dma-siri-ai-de...