dbbk

22 ms·

451.
by dbbk 1y ago
They even explicitly admit to this. In the recent Decoder podcast the CEO said they will always choose engagement and gamification over teaching you the 'best' way. Which is not a terrible strategy. Most people learning languages
452.
by dbbk 1y ago
Ironically, Twitter's mechanism of auto-verifying anyone over 1M followers kind of achieves this.
453.
by dbbk 1y ago
Right, LLMs don't understand TS, because they're not integrated with it. When they come across something they don't know, they just start hallucinating, and don't even verify if it's actually valid (because they can
454.
by dbbk 1y ago
LLMs don’t even understand fucking TypeScript, which you would expect a computer program to be able to understand. I can’t get it to write valid Drizzle code to save my life, it will confidently hallucinate method imports that don’t even ex
455.
by dbbk 1y ago
Of course it was user-hostile. I can't tell you how many times I would get linked to an AMP version of a page on desktop, with text spanning the entire width of the screen, and no way to get back to the 'normal' version.
456.
by dbbk 1y ago
That was the replacement mechanism after AMP, yes
457.
by dbbk 1y ago
AMP is dead
458.
by dbbk 1y ago
Thinking perhaps, but why not reasoning?
459.
by dbbk 2y ago
Google has the best model right now and, crucially, a profitable business to float it. I don't see how OpenAI possibly outlasts them at this.
460.
by dbbk 2y ago
Periodically I keep trying these coding models in Copilot and I have yet to have an experience where it produced working code with a pretty straightforward TypeScript codebase. Specifically, it cannot for the life of it produce working Driz
461.
by dbbk 2y ago
Definitely not. Why would they let web devs render outside of the browser window? That's a recipe for disaster.
462.
by dbbk 2y ago
But the article states they negotiated.
463.
by dbbk 2y ago
They actually appear to be working on "Interceptors" which is what you're describing; https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/70961
464.
by dbbk 2y ago
I would not describe working at HP as upwards personally, I'd rather just go back to consulting
465.
by dbbk 2y ago
They do lazy load by default now, at least.
466.
by dbbk 2y ago
Braindead take.
467.
by dbbk 2y ago
How come your website doesn't even explain what it is?
468.
by dbbk 2y ago
They're already being abused. They're being made to sleep at work.
469.
by dbbk 2y ago
I keep coming back to try these models. o1, Sonnet, o3-mini. None of them can produce correct Drizzle code to save their lives. It is just straight up not possible. It seems they don't even consider TypeScript errors... it is always ca
470.
by dbbk 2y ago
They still offer support by email though
471.
by dbbk 2y ago
You're seriously advocating for inline styles in the year 2025, it does not surprise me you are confused.
472.
by dbbk 2y ago
Just copy and paste them out?
473.
by dbbk 2y ago
Truthfully, this was never necessary. It was sold to the industry by the merchants of complexity. You can just have a HTML file with an SPA that calls API. This is fine.
474.
by dbbk 2y ago
Like really, I use Styled Components, just call it a Wrapper or InnerWrapper or Row or whatever and move on
475.
by dbbk 2y ago
> I don’t miss the days of emotion and styled components where I would have to think of a name for every styled div in the project I see people mention this issue fairly frequently, and it puzzles me a little. I have never once spent pro
476.
by dbbk 2y ago
May be a hack but it just works.
477.
by dbbk 2y ago
I think the reason they did it is because she speaks so slowly so it's more understandable for beginners
478.
by dbbk 2y ago
The Traitors is for my grandma. Beast games is for teenagers who are used to TikTok.
479.
by dbbk 2y ago
If I understand right my API will be versioned alongside my app, so there will be multiple versions running. How much granularity control do we have over this? Does every single app release have its own API "version"?
480.
by dbbk 2y ago
With respect, literally the exact opposite is true. I think you're mistaking it with something else.

More ›