davorak

7 ms·

61.
by davorak 9mo ago
The part I quoted: > This restriction is specifically about competitive use - you cannot use Claude to build products that compete with Anthropic's offerings. Is more strict than the examples. The examples are what I think may not
62.
by davorak 9mo ago
> This restriction is specifically about competitive use - you cannot use Claude to build products that compete with Anthropic's offerings. I am not a lawyer, regardless of the list of examples below(I have been told examples in c
63.
by davorak 9mo ago
"smart" is sometimes short for "smart aleck"
64.
by davorak 9mo ago
> People would rather blame external factors and not take responsibility. In my opinion the first step to taking responsibility is acknowledging reality. That reality can includes brains and bodies being different, sometimes extremely s
65.
by davorak 9mo ago
I would be interested in knowing what cereal box you saw it on or where you saw it promoted seriously in the last 20 years. In the late 90s I was in high school in a town with less that 80k people in the middle of the congenital USA and the
66.
by davorak 9mo ago
That is what I found on my quick search too. I am pretty sure I saw some alternatives to the bread, ... based pyramid before 2005 as well.
67.
by davorak 9mo ago
I asked it else where but > Where in the world was this old pyramid still being pushed? https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46538456
68.
by davorak 9mo ago
What is on the US schedule that is not on Euro schedule?
69.
by davorak 9mo ago
I post this elsewhere but: I have not seen the pyramid with bread, cereal, rice and pasta at the base pushed for at least ~20 years. Maybe it was 25-30 years ago when I saw it pushed seriously in school and even then I did not see people ta
70.
by davorak 9mo ago
> previous advice that included more grains than fruit and veg combined I have not seen the pyramid with bread, cereal, rice and pasta at the base pushed for at least ~20 years. Maybe it was 25-30 years ago when I saw it pushed seriousl
71.
by davorak 10mo ago
> Well is it the humans responsibility and action, or is it not? You can't have it both ways. Seems to contradict your later: > But an AI wishes you a nice day, suddenly it's all pitchforks and torches. Are you attributing t
72.
by davorak 10mo ago
You are not the only one calling this a thank you email, but no one decided to say thank you to Rob Pike so I can not consider it a "thank you" email. It is spam. Interactions with the AI are posted publicly: > All conversatio
73.
by davorak 10mo ago
> "thank you for all the hard work you've done" Who is decided to say "thank you" to Rob Pike in this case? I am not sure there is anyone, so in my mind there is not real "thank you" here. As far as I c
74.
by davorak 10mo ago
> Why they don't use zero knowledge proof? Some proposed implementation do this. Without the requirement there is no chance of your ID or age being leaked, with zero knowledge proof, there is a chance they leak but can be made small
75.
by davorak 11mo ago
It's hard to explain to a non technical user. Something like "We tried to delete the message, but some of the people who received your message might still have a copy." Does not sound great and is going to be hard for a non
76.
by davorak 11mo ago
>But when Ramanujan says 1 + 2 + 3 + … = -1/12 because god told him we accept that as a reasonable explanation. What community accepts that as reasonable explanation?
77.
by davorak 11mo ago
> A form of protest I assume, Or to avoid the fines and/or to avoid integrating some age verification service. Maybe symbolic since it unlikely the site would be prosecuted, even if they were in violation in some minor form. It is e
78.
by davorak 1y ago
> nor is YouTube bound by the Constitution. nitpick - Youtube is bound by the US Constitution, it is the highest law of the land. 1A[1] is only about binding the government/congresses power though so youtube is not bound by 1A. [1]
79.
by davorak 1y ago
The newest pull request is: https://github.com/typst/typst/pull/7137 from what I can tell. The commits look two days old so work looks on going. I do not understand the current set of preferences laid out in
80.
by davorak 1y ago
> The rest of the Spotify podcast covers Jessica's side, but I think you've missed the subtext. Link's? Timestamps? I skimmed the much of the podcast now and I did not hear anything like this from Jessica. > prioritized
81.
by davorak 1y ago
> YC's Jessica Livingston and the founder of TripleByte I listened to video and I did not see anywhere where Jessica made an observation along those lines. I did not hear quotas talked about explicitly either, though companies wanti
82.
by davorak 1y ago
> Randomized studies show I opened the link and searched for "random" and id not find anything. I thought there was going to be something like a randomized controlled trial or similar from what you said but if random does not s
83.
by davorak 1y ago
> Making the talk proposal process blind seems more like meritocracy than DEI. The people opposing DEI [claim to] want qualifications to matter and race/gender/whatever issues not to. Making a process blind to the person applyi
84.
by davorak 1y ago
> It has no weight; it is inoperative. You are claiming that if the PSF took the grant and the NSF, or the president, decided the PSF was promoting DEI they would not be able to claw back funds?
85.
by davorak 1y ago
> - then you approve the PR. Because your job is not to gatekeep the code I can see this working when the person who wrote the code is responsible for making sure the product works for the client and that their code does not interfere wi
86.
by davorak 1y ago
Sure that is true of any trauma physical or otherwise. It is always some part genetic and some part environment. I assume just like for other areas we have a clear picture of a narrow subset of factors that is clearly genetic and some is
87.
by davorak 1y ago
> now a guy claiming direct correlation with trauma based on what you went through for some seconds/minutes right after you born? feels like some Freud and their charlatans type of shit not "soft science" Dave Asprey made
88.
by davorak 1y ago
> The problem I'm seeing more and more is that these pop culture trauma books are targeted at the widest audience possible. These authors push trauma as the explanation for everything, so people seeking self-help read these books an
89.
by davorak 1y ago
jaybrendansmith is talking specifically about childhood trauma not any trauma that happens in childhood. > But not childhood trauma...that makes you weaker I have only seen "childhood trauma" defined and used as something that
90.
by davorak 1y ago
I think I have always been able to have branching conversations via editing a comment. The interface remembers both the old and new conversation thread and you can switch between them. It seems like the new "Branch in new chat" fe

More ›