davorak

38 ms·

421.
by davorak 11y ago
From memory of quantum class the amplitude is a complex number and are not directly probabilities: Most convenient reference: > In quantum mechanics, a probability amplitude is a complex number ... https://en.wikipedia.org&#x
422.
by davorak 11y ago
Just above the commit count: > Future Node.js releases will be from this repo. https://iojs.org It is part of github's repo description.
423.
by davorak 11y ago
You can use github's api to identify out who pushed a commit: Currently the event in question is on page 3 so you can use: https://api.github.com/repos/amoffat/masquerade/events?page=... It i will roll t
424.
by davorak 11y ago
> But it doesn't absolve the attacker of any responsibility for damages caused, either. stephen_g was questioning the assumption that he caused any damage at all. > Surely it was NASA's bad security practices that cost them
425.
by davorak 12y ago
> It would be interesting to see studies that isolated the effects of genes and environment. The colorado adoption project can be good source of that type of information, in my limit understanding, example: http://www.ncbi.nlm
426.
by davorak 12y ago
That could be made to work. The altered files are being served from ips within China even if the attack comes from those external to China downloading the altered files.
427.
by davorak 12y ago
> when collapsing superposition of two states you might need to (or rather almost always) need the ratio of worlds with outcome A to worlds with outcome B to be irrational. So unless you create a continuum of new worlds each time it won&
428.
by davorak 12y ago
> the general common law rule is that doing a thing is de facto permitted unless a law says otherwise. Sure but if the law is vague than the enforcement can be broad or narrow depending on case law and the interpretation of judges. It is
429.
by davorak 12y ago
The main concern seemed to be weather or not it was on the burden of the state to prove illegal content before blocking or if it was on the user to prove their content is legal to prevent blocking.
430.
by davorak 12y ago
If memory serves me it was tried, many times soon after blood transfusions become known to the public. Many rich in europe claimed the blood transfusions from the young rejuvenated them in many respects. I do not remember where I read this
431.
by davorak 12y ago
Unless you use more esoteric feature of vim than I do the evil package does a good job of replicating the vim experience for me. I am still in the process of converting myself.
432.
by davorak 12y ago
> that part of my comment was said in humor. I think more will read it seriously than not.
433.
by davorak 12y ago
My assertion is that ~page of text has no introduction to a difference or connection between the wave/particle duality and the uncertainty principle. So there are no sources to track down.
434.
by davorak 12y ago
Indeed! I miss groklaw tremendously.
435.
by davorak 12y ago
That ~1 page of text does not discuss a connection or difference between the wave/particle duality and the uncertainty principle. It does mention at least one standard interpretation and have several quotes from famous people however.
436.
by davorak 12y ago
> This article gets the paper totally wrong. Learning that the uncertainty principle gives rise to phenomena that popular science calls "wave-particle" duality was taught to me in quantum 101. This is how it was taught to peers
437.
by davorak 12y ago
> yet once someone has it deep it no longer matters to them. Unfortunately, I think it is more accurate to say they are not longer the same person.
438.
by davorak 12y ago
>Singapore has this provision because the market is too small for lots of drugs to come in. Interesting how do doctors end up bearing "full responsibility"? It seems like something has to work differently in civil court or curr
439.
by davorak 12y ago
> really smart but simply too analytically inclined to comprehend normal prose? I can not connect this type of comprehension problem to the analytical trait/skill/etc. I have definitely see similar comprehension mistakes in no
440.
by davorak 12y ago
> The author opens by suggesting that Russians have discovered and use a different set of chemical elements than the ones we use in the United States I did not read the author suggesting this. Your example was part of a hypothetical anal
441.
by davorak 12y ago
I agree with TeMPOraL, the first sentence sets up the example: > Imagine if a chemist told you offhandedly that the Russians had different chemical elements than we did. Make it clear that different elements being used in Russia is a hyp
442.
by davorak 12y ago
You could use it to do that, though my non-expert understanding is that FEM will beat out FDTD for antenna design on many occasions.
443.
by davorak 12y ago
> As I understand it, it's an entirely closed system. You got the gist correct. The microwaves are supposed to be completely contained.
444.
by davorak 12y ago
From the Chinese graduate students and professors that I have talked to the problems seems to be that it is really is to commit fraud and get a way with it. In particular in some fields you can get rich writing grants, getting a considerabl
445.
by davorak 12y ago
In the majority of physical experiments doing a blind test is not that helpful, since it will not change the physical data. It can happen that blind testing is helpful, but most of the time it is a sign that the protocol or equipment needs
446.
by davorak 12y ago
The terms of service for coredemia is currently set so contributors retain nearly all rights to the content they post. If you look at the bottom of stackoverflow.com you can read that all contributions to SO are licended under the http:&#x
447.
by davorak 12y ago
Are there plans to license the posted content similar to stackoverflow so it can be used for the public good? Having a queryable database of comments on journal articles would certainly be nice. The SO equivalent would be: http:/&#x2
448.
by davorak 12y ago
> I would again say that you can think whatever you want, but don't accuse and label me as something that I am not because I disagree with you. I was not contesting anything along these lines. In addition nilved was relatively caref
449.
by davorak 12y ago
> sex differences shouldn't be grounds to accuse people of sexism. I have often seen people hold the assumption that you have a strong opinion on exactly what the mental difference are between male, female, etc with out good researc
450.
by davorak 12y ago
Your first comment: > Guys are less subtle -- we're wired to be more attracted to the binary good/bad aspect of things. The male power dynamic is powerful/weak. Girls sweat the details. You clarify latter you are "off

More ›