Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
davorak
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
46 ms
·
301.
▲
by
davorak
3y ago
> Training a model on a bunch of images by {artist}, and then telling it "Generate me 20 images in the style of {artist}" seems pretty close to this ruling. Maybe, but that is not how dalle and other generative AI work right no
302.
▲
by
davorak
3y ago
> right, anyone can use a lightscreen, put a piece of paper over Goldsmiths photo and then trace it with either pens or paint. Where you run into issues is trying to say that the copy you made is yours and licensing it, the ruling seems
303.
▲
by
davorak
3y ago
> Not really, its trained on the previous object to recreate said object given outside changes... All generative AI packages, that I know of, are not going to use material only from one artist even when generating something in that artis
304.
▲
by
davorak
3y ago
I am interested in examples of similar legal systems working as expected/desired. I live in the USA and the trope that I am exposed to here is that of bureaucracy slowing things down unnecessarily, special interests capturing regulator
305.
▲
by
davorak
3y ago
If I understanding you correctly you are saying that Meta's reputation is on public trial, which I think is accurate.
306.
▲
by
davorak
4y ago
> I am not arguing for or against either side, I am just pointing out a flaw in your logic. I do not see a flaw in their logic: > NPR continuing to publish programming critical of Trump during the Trump presidency, is a pretty strong
307.
▲
by
davorak
4y ago
State funded media is a phrase, it has meaning beyond the literal meaning of the words. Wikipedia's 'State media' page seems to have it covered: > State media or government media are media outlets that are under financial
308.
▲
by
davorak
4y ago
I think it would be hard to directly study the ~1/3, ~320-420ppm increase in background CO2 levels over the last ~60 years: https://www.climate.gov/news-features/understanding-climate/... Maybe raising rats i
309.
▲
by
davorak
4y ago
In my experience claims of knowing the intelligence of another person are often wrong. Enough so that I reserve judgement much more often than not. I think the above is part of the doubt you are running into with your claim. You might be
310.
▲
by
davorak
4y ago
> But I’m curious, hacker news, how many of you are concerned (like Eliezer) that LLMs lead to strong AI and the AI itself (rather than its users) endangering humanity? LLMs do not need to lead to strong AI for Eliezer's worries to
311.
▲
by
davorak
4y ago
The 30 billion times the size of the sun is BBC making a mistake. It is 30 billion solar masses. Direct from durham [1] from the arxiv article [2]. techwiz137 pointed out[3] an existing known black hole, TON618, is 66 billion solar masses[4
312.
▲
by
davorak
4y ago
I did a rough calc in: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35361280 When it was pointed out TON618 has ~66 billion solar masses. But if it is 30 billion times the size of the sun then I think that means it is ~2354000 bill
313.
▲
by
davorak
4y ago
edit the bbc article got it wrong withe 30 billion times the size and it supposed to be 30 billion solar masses see [1] or the arxiv article [2] The bbc article says 30 billion times the size while TON618 is 66 billion times the mass. Wikip
314.
▲
by
davorak
4y ago
> I dont see how posting trivia about the SEC's origin take away from it now being moat protecting, outdated entity. You argued that "courts or congress" should determine whether Ethereum meets the bar for being a security
315.
▲
by
davorak
4y ago
> That will need to be determined in the courts or congress, not by a regulatory bully. The SEC was set up by congress, the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and several others [1]. The Howey test was made by
316.
▲
by
davorak
4y ago
> Which any framework will give you, because being out of sync with your state means that your app is broken; and it is the purpose of any framework in existence to help you prevent your app from breaking. That is common now yes and I th
317.
▲
by
davorak
4y ago
One of my complaints about reading computer science and/or programming books in the early 2000(or late 1990s?) was the contradictory definitions of MVC in books I read at the time. I think one book even indicated that MVVM(I think) wa
318.
▲
by
davorak
4y ago
> Your UI should be a pure function of your state. I have seen this expressed elsewhere and and how schwartzworld is using it seems to be the common usage and makes sense to me. So if my UI, the DOM on a page, should be a pure function o
319.
▲
by
davorak
4y ago
> I thought everyone knew the person that reads the code can only describe it to someone else who writes the new code. Having the same party do it would make it a copy, if the purpose and construction is the same. The same party can do i
320.
▲
by
davorak
4y ago
The weather data that the circumvention provides access to is not copy righted though right? From other comments I gather it comes from public data and is not the companies. If so it would not meet the criteria in the first sentence of your
321.
▲
by
davorak
4y ago
> you'd understand that the line of thinking is "The Metaverse is going to be so awesome!" > It's really not That is an understandable message. My comment is only about how the analogy to A Modest Proposal is not a
322.
▲
by
davorak
4y ago
> So he's actively making fun of them He is making fun of people who want the "good parts"? Super realistic, immersive VR? Or a brain to computer interface? The "bad parts" are not a consequence of the "goo
323.
▲
by
davorak
4y ago
A Modest Proposal was written to sway the readers to a line of thinking about a topic that was prevalent at the time. What prevalent issue and what line of thinking is Palmer's article about? Right now it seems more likely to me that P
324.
▲
by
davorak
4y ago
I enjoyed reading the article. I think it does a good job of explaining the authors thought process. I would also like to see the author would write in a "potential solutions"(or similar) section. It sounds like the author has f
325.
▲
by
davorak
4y ago
It is a common technique, in my experience, to generalize parts of an argument to make it easier to find a shared philosophy or principle. Then Shared understanding can cooperatively be built on the common ground formed by the shared philos
326.
▲
by
davorak
4y ago
It looks like mariusor gave you a statement, with no direct connection to a real group of people, that is almost tautologically true. > Supporting the persecution of a group of people because of their ethnicity (or whichever other criter
327.
▲
by
davorak
4y ago
> No, it's not semantics. It is easy to interrupt you argument as semantics, because you can remove 'objectively' from mariusor's statement and the intended meaning does not seem to change much: 'I am arguing tha
328.
▲
by
davorak
4y ago
> But when it turns into losing the right to have any job whatsoever, then no, that's definitely not okay either. wesleywt seems to be against this too since removing a legal right like that would require government action and they
329.
▲
by
davorak
4y ago
Still works ok for me 'what is an iris site: .edu' First result https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/web/20120921215133/http:/... Short but description of the iris and the function in the eye. For tex
330.
▲
by
davorak
4y ago
> When someone’s values are so different it’s hard to have any sort of meaningful conversation. I recommend having 'deep' conversations. Dig down into definitions, in to differences perceived, find where your perceptions diffe
More ›