daveguy

7 ms·

91.
by daveguy 3mo ago
Both of those things only happen once by the LLM model provider and not every time a prompt is issued.
92.
by daveguy 3mo ago
I think just the possibility of consequences that they can give a damn about. An LLM doesn't have feelings no matter how much human-like text it can simulate. There is literally nothing going on between prompts for any given model.
93.
by daveguy 3mo ago
> Why did you drop the first half of the sentence in your quote? Because this entire discussion is about the release of a new model, and models are fixed. Sure you can try to modify all the scaffolding around it, but the model is the mod
94.
by daveguy 3mo ago
The models do not get better until a new one is released. And we are already at diminishing returns. So sorry. Also sorry you don't know the difference between a model and a context, harness, router, or cache.
95.
by daveguy 3mo ago
None of what you mentioned changes the model. Because it's a fixed model. The weights are constant. It does not learn. It only knows what gets repeatedly fed to it and those fixed relationships represented by the weights. You can prete
96.
by daveguy 3mo ago
Neural plasticity is real, and something LLMs are incapable of. So sorry.
97.
by daveguy 3mo ago
> Often yes. In this case, it's more like they get upset when someone says something factually wrong, and then defensively changes the goalposts. Oh give me a break. Show me one example of 1) any knob twisting that makes the underly
98.
by daveguy 3mo ago
Right. They can do all those things. And none of that will make it smart or able to learn new things. The underlying model is just an llm. But judging from the downvotes, it seems AI folks get upset when someone talks honestly about their p
99.
by daveguy 3mo ago
It was edited. Original talked about the model learning. Glad they managed to clarify. Because the models are quite literally stupid.
100.
by daveguy 3mo ago
The models don't get better, except when a new one is released. Their performance depends solely on the model training before release and how well you curate the context you feed it. That's it. Contrary to popular belief these thi
101.
by daveguy 3mo ago
Can we turn off the whining bitchy little comments like yours along with the political commentary? That would be great. Did you honestly think the mechanazi / porn generator AI wouldn't receive negative comments? Even "har
102.
by daveguy 3mo ago
I doubt you can turn that off. That's how they upgrade it up from a tool to an engagement optimized addiction platform.
103.
by daveguy 3mo ago
Or, phrased another way: there's a reason why we consider basic availability in nines and 2 nines is still considered pretty bad. 99% uptime means being down over 7 hours each month.
104.
by daveguy 3mo ago
Russia is a paper tiger.
105.
by daveguy 3mo ago
That's not how mantle3d works. It's 3d printed metal alternating with CNC machining after several layers for precision: https://mantle3d.com/how-it-works/ This is optionally followed by a pressurized furnace
106.
by daveguy 3mo ago
Yeah, big 'ol asterisks in this "world air speed record". This is for electric-powered flight, and is equivalent to 57% of Mach-1.
107.
by daveguy 3mo ago
Bottom-line win-win! All hail the shareholder value!
108.
by daveguy 3mo ago
Or it's just plagiarism, eg "windows blinked awake": https://web.archive.org/web/20190825132048/https://patriciae... See also "wind moved restlessly", "weather became angry&
109.
by daveguy 3mo ago
It's because the first sentence of the American Society of Civil Engineers code of ethics is: Members of The American Society of Civil Engineers conduct themselves with integrity and professionalism, and above all else protect and adva
110.
by daveguy 3mo ago
FYI, AI isn't fond of a goddamn thing. They have token prediction quirks that don't follow typical English.
111.
by daveguy 3mo ago
I think that depends on what generation you're in. Because that generation is definitely here now and pissed off at the manipulative enshittification.
112.
by daveguy 3mo ago
Oh, thank you. I didn't know that. Sorry about my ignorance. Really thought that it defaulted to a direct machine code without library assistance.
113.
by daveguy 3mo ago
I am referring to the hype causing it to be adopted now instead of a decade ago, not the specific implementation. The hype causing people to adopt AI of all kinds hastily without proper validation.
114.
by daveguy 3mo ago
No, but it is about the, very expected, shitshow caused by the AI hype. When companies think cramming AI in any random place is a magic bullet for replacing workers, shit breaks. Because AI is dumb af. LLMs are just the shittiest of the way
115.
by daveguy 3mo ago
Ruh roh. https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cgrkd41n2v9o
116.
by daveguy 3mo ago
Either you do not understand what assembly is, or you are being pedantic about the very thin abstraction between assembly and opcodes. Just in case you didn't know, assembly is a convenient way to read the binary opcodes that the cou u
117.
by daveguy 3mo ago
That's exactly what I said. Rust compiles to binary opcodes. Assembly is not an rtos, and does not require one. ASM isn't a standard "language". It's literally a fancy display of opcodes and registers that the CPU r
118.
by daveguy 3mo ago
Rust compiles to bare metal (assembly aka machine instruction code), just like C does.
119.
by daveguy 3mo ago
Because there a bunch of social media deluded asshats that want to argue about it in bad faith. See also: "Fauci caused COVID" Unfortunately social media deluded asshats is the prevailing theme of the United States on this 250 yea
120.
by daveguy 3mo ago
Because this was a staged demo, not an experiment. Mythos performed more poorly but they don't want to admit it. The phrase "because of how we had set up the experiment" means "we didn't have experimental controls a

More ›