daveguy

29 ms·

661.
by daveguy 1y ago
I agree it's not very clear. They would do well to mention it somewhere besides the main site footer because it would probably help adoption / community / testing too. That said, any company with a lawyer wouldn't let th
662.
by daveguy 1y ago
It is an official Mozilla Foundation subsidiary. Their website is here: https://www.mozilla.ai/
663.
by daveguy 1y ago
It seems the wood-structure cubesat format would be better for this. [0] The stated goal is to "solve the space trash problem" with space planes that burn up easier in the atmosphere. It seems like it doesn't need aerodynamic
664.
by daveguy 1y ago
The AI did not and cannot escape guardrails. It is an inference engine where the engine happens to sometimes trigger outside action. These things aren't intelligent or self-directed or self-motivated to "try" anything at all.
665.
by daveguy 1y ago
... and which ones are the ones that can't be reversed?
666.
by daveguy 1y ago
Sorry, but you are incorrect. Most payment systems today can be tracked and reversed. Crypto will too, after it becomes well regulated, and then it will lose its appeal and crash. No one wants to mess with some convoluted cryptography based
667.
by daveguy 1y ago
And then you can have untrackable and irreversible scams, money laundering and ransomware without the crypto? Yay?
668.
by daveguy 1y ago
Honestly we have no idea what the human split is between "context" and "weights" aside from a superficial understanding that there are long term and short term memories. The long term memory/experience seems a lot c
669.
by daveguy 1y ago
> The Story Breakdown - Everything in 15-30 minute chunks. Why? Because that's roughly how long before Claude starts forgetting what we discussed ten minutes ago. Like a goldfish with a PhD. This is interesting. Does Claude have a m
670.
by daveguy 1y ago
If they just put a checkbox by the search bar that keeps state, I wonder what percent would uncheck it.
671.
by daveguy 1y ago
Because LLMs are notoriously unreliable especially over long context. Telling it something like "check the time before every turn" is going to fail after enough interactions. MCP call is more reliable for programmatic and specific
672.
by daveguy 1y ago
Not everything is about productivity per dollar. It's also the source of a pipeline of well trained research scientists who go into cutting edge fields with good pay.
673.
by daveguy 1y ago
I found it way more coherent, succinct, insightful, and well organized than the vast majority of slop that comes out of an LLM.
674.
by daveguy 1y ago
Time will tell.
675.
by daveguy 1y ago
How about service proxy vs web proxy rather than reverse proxy and proxy? Makes more clear that one is a proxy on the service side and the other is a proxy on the client side. Service proxy and Client proxy might be even better.
676.
by daveguy 1y ago
Yup. Exactly this. As soon as enough people get screwed by the ~80% accuracy rate, the whole facade will crumble. Unless AI companies manage to bring the accuracy up 20% in the next year, by either limiting scope or finding new methods, it
677.
by daveguy 1y ago
Double spend any bitcoins in their possession? Or just announce and prove that they are doing it, thereby causing a run on bitcoin and all the other bozobucks.
678.
by daveguy 1y ago
Yup, good point. Another flaw along with software and compute that no one seems to pay attention to. When the Bitcoin bubble pops everyone trying to squeeze through a few transactions is going to identify the actual worth of Bitcoin.
679.
by daveguy 1y ago
So there are two different places that a coup against bitcoin could occur? Processing and Software. With something like 45% of processing controlled by entities in Iran, China, and Russia, it seems like an absolute fools game to put any sig
680.
by daveguy 1y ago
I agree with this. I really do not know why in the hell one person or entity owning 500 houses wouldn't pay more in taxes for the 500th house than the 1st house. You pay more income tax on the 500,000th dollar than the first dollar.
681.
by daveguy 1y ago
It is quasi-deterministic (sans a heat parameter) and it only ever responds to a query. It is not at all autonomous. If you let it do chain-of-thought for too long or any sort of continuous feedback loop it always goes off the rails. It is
682.
by daveguy 1y ago
My back button isn't hijacked unless I scroll to the end on Firefox Mobile.
683.
by daveguy 1y ago
But it is one of the only places you can pay to have your message delivered next to messages from Hitler bots and coup plotters. So... there's that.
684.
by daveguy 1y ago
It is not a judge of whether we got to AGI. And literally no one except straw-manning critics are trying to claim it is . The point is, an AGI should easily be able to pass it. But it can obviously be passed without getting to AGI (as .
685.
by daveguy 1y ago
Yes. Welcome to 1981. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sinclair_Research
686.
by daveguy 1y ago
An AI slop generator is not even closely related to progress.
687.
by daveguy 1y ago
> There is a popular derivative heuristic that the economy is "good" when ADP > BLS. Surely that doesn't apply when both metrics are bad? I don't know. I'm not familiar with job reporting statistics. So info &
688.
by daveguy 1y ago
Seems more like you are deep into a twitter propaganda feed. We all saw Musk's Nazi salutes, and incompetent fuckups in government. Also, he has been lying about the proximity of actual FSD for at least a decade. At least he stopped ev
689.
by daveguy 1y ago
Did any of your research include owning any other brand of EV?
690.
by daveguy 1y ago
Yes, but if you're a nation state with dictatorial control over a nation's resources, +5% might be all you need.

More ›