Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
daveguy
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
16 ms
·
301.
▲
by
daveguy
7mo ago
Yes, we reserve additional scrutiny, roundup, and detention for people who are vaguely Latino.
302.
▲
by
daveguy
7mo ago
When he forgets to tell us how smart he is, and how many very difficult dementia tests he's passed. That's when he'll be fully scrambled.
303.
▲
by
daveguy
7mo ago
He can make the executive branch call it The Dumpty Bowl if he wants. That doesn't mean he has renamed it. He has zero power outside the executive branch. Fortunately the United States isn't yet ruled by decree.
304.
▲
by
daveguy
7mo ago
The point is, the name of the DoD is still the Department of Defense. Just like his dumb ass calling the Gulf of Mexico the Gulf of America didn't change the fact that it's still the Gulf of Mexico. All it meant is him wasting mon
305.
▲
by
daveguy
7mo ago
Exactly representative of the single anecdotal examples designed to equate all immigrants to criminally illegal villains. You may have a point if this was the typical example of the kind of people Dumpty is rounding up. But they are pulling
306.
▲
by
daveguy
7mo ago
The collapse happened when we elected a power drunk fool with a Project 2025 playbook to completely strip the separation of powers in favor of the Executive branch. Now the war fool is trying to start as many conflicts as possible inside an
307.
▲
by
daveguy
7mo ago
Current LLMs are nowhere near qualified to be autonomous without a human in the loop. They just aren't rigorous enough. Especially the "scientist throwing a swarm to deal with common ML exploratory tasks." The judgement of mo
308.
▲
by
daveguy
7mo ago
Most places that ask for a phone number refuse to accept Google Voice or Twilio phone numbers. It's specifically to guarantee you have a cell-phone assigned number. Can anyone confirm whether Anthropic allows Google Voice or Twilio num
309.
▲
by
daveguy
8mo ago
Past being the key point. Because, right now it's all Dumpty all the time, until we boot his weak tools and fools November. I'm confident we are stronger than that two bit corrupt fraud, and will get back to where science funding
310.
▲
by
daveguy
8mo ago
I mean, they're both authoritarian right now. But at least one of them doesn't think science is woke. So....
311.
▲
by
daveguy
8mo ago
Weird. I have seen a bunch of people repeating that quote, but not a single source for the full court transcript. Court transcript are public record, available for request by anyone. So it's real strange no one seems to have a source r
312.
▲
by
daveguy
8mo ago
Of course the second amendment isn't allowed in his courtroom. It's literally not allowed in any courtroom in the country. It's a courtroom . The only people permitted to have guns in a courtroom in the US are the bailiffs a
313.
▲
by
daveguy
8mo ago
> The only thing where I don’t trust it yet is when code must be copy pasted. I can’t trace if it actually cuts and pastes code, or if the LLM brain is in between. In the latter case there may be tiny errors that I’d never find, so I’m n
314.
▲
by
daveguy
8mo ago
Nah, just an observation. Or my hypothesis is accurate and they were just taking it at face value like you apparently did (assuming you are posting in good faith). The click bait appeal couldn't have hurt (although I agree with your ex
315.
▲
by
daveguy
8mo ago
I'm saying it doesn't take much for someone to say, "yeah, I would have voted for the guy already in power". I'm surprised it wasn't much higher than that. So no, you definitely misrepresented my theory. It doe
316.
▲
by
daveguy
8mo ago
A 2025 study... Asking people if they "would have" voted for the winner of the election, a corrupt vindictive racist asshat already in power ? Well, I guess that's one way to conduct a study. Fortunately the shift in senti
317.
▲
by
daveguy
8mo ago
Less than you might think. He didn't win a majority of the vote, just a plurality. And less than 2 of 3 eligible voters actually voted. So he got about 30% of the eligible population to vote for "yay grievance hate politics!"
318.
▲
by
daveguy
8mo ago
The most basic adaptive cruise control is "awesome" in bumper to bumper traffic.
319.
▲
by
daveguy
8mo ago
1000% agree recommendation algorithms should not be allowed. Sorting and user criteria, great. But nothing should be pushed without clear acknowledgement of the user. Anything software recommends should be specified by the user.
320.
▲
by
daveguy
8mo ago
It would have been more straightforward to say, "Please help me build a database of what prompt injections look like. Be creative!"
321.
▲
by
daveguy
8mo ago
It looks like the point is Home Assistant integration. I seriously doubt they need an led to be blinked on and off based on a mock sensor. That's either "for the integration test" or "as a placeholder for something more&
322.
▲
by
daveguy
8mo ago
Hah. Even LLMs know Meta and Palantir are evil af.
323.
▲
by
daveguy
8mo ago
The failure mode is getting lumped into AI because AI is a lot more likely to fail. We've done this with Neural Networks v1, Expert Systems, Neural Networks v2, SVM, etc, etc. only a matter of time before we figured it out with deep ne
324.
▲
by
daveguy
8mo ago
There should definitely be an independent board like the fed (different decisions per area, maybe different boards per state) that determines need for the next 5 years. This is the way they do hospital beds (state level), but not doctors to
325.
▲
by
daveguy
8mo ago
It's not broken from Google's perspective. The results are just optimized for their ad revenue rather than your viewing preference. Even the engagement hooks don't care what your viewing preferences are - just what they'
326.
▲
by
daveguy
8mo ago
Just because tech oligarchs are coopting "alignment" for regulatory capture doesn't mean it's not a real research area and important topic in AI. When we are using natural language with AI, ambiguity is implied. When you
327.
▲
by
daveguy
8mo ago
If your needs are that sensitive, I doubt you'll find anything anytime soon that doesn't require a human in the loop. Even SOTA models only average 95% accuracy on messy inputs. If that's a per character accuracy (which OCR i
328.
▲
by
daveguy
8mo ago
How dare you bring logic and pragmatic thinking to a discussion about the singularity. This is the singularity we are talking about. No reality allowed.
329.
▲
by
daveguy
8mo ago
What I want to know is how bitcoin going full tulip and Open AI going bankrupt will affect the projection. Can they extrapolate that? Extrapolation of those two event dates would be sufficient, regardless of effect on a potential singularit
330.
▲
by
daveguy
8mo ago
The point isn't whether the subsidy is for the destitute. It's whether it matters for incomes below the living wage or poverty wage. You can't buy milk and bread with a school voucher and the meager child tax credit is a pitt
More ›