dathinab

18 ms·

211.
by dathinab 7mo ago
people already have been doing that with fake "rgb only" RAM sticks
212.
by dathinab 7mo ago
"not know" was oversimplified from me, technically such things exist in many countries, most likely also Italy. But this comes back to how thinks always tend to be more complicate then "clean cut direct tax avoidance". E
213.
by dathinab 7mo ago
> The parent controls on devices is terrible. Which is IMHO my take on what should be done. 1. require functioning parent controls (here its also worth considering the abuse of parent controls). A problem here is the absence of a proper
214.
by dathinab 7mo ago
If you are found personally responsible for tax evasion >1e6€ then the minimal penalty is prison sentence without parole option. This is true for many EU countries including Italy. Idk. about the max. prison length in Italy for this but
215.
by dathinab 7mo ago
except you can nudge LLMs to use different stiles more similar to your writing they aren't good at it but viable and more important this is about LLMs fixing grammar, spelling and pointing out bad formulations with change recommendatio
216.
by dathinab 7mo ago
there is tools out there which can use in ways where it normally won't change the content. And it's not that you are blindly posting the output of it. It's also about fixing grammar, spelling, formulation issues. It's no
217.
by dathinab 7mo ago
through it isn't AI generated content if the content still comes from you
218.
by dathinab 7mo ago
What is meant with AI-edited?? AI can do a grate job for grammar, spell and formulation checking/fixing without changing any content. I.e. just adding as a fancy version of extended spell checking. While I do currently not use it like
219.
by dathinab 7mo ago
not low-signal, but no sign at all This isn't a defense of this people at all. It is just also not an argument against their intellect either. Just look at what they nonsense they say all the time, and how they arguments and reasoning
220.
by dathinab 7mo ago
this isn't wrong but spelling and grammar still isn't a good indicator for expertise, intelligence or anything like that even in an academic context Mainly: 1. Dyslexia doesn't make you dump, just likely to misspell and a les
221.
by dathinab 7mo ago
can we just ban them? like if EU countries themself decide to undermine their own rights thats their thing but if external powers try to undermine EU constitutions isn't that a attack on those countries and shouldn't that be a cri
222.
by dathinab 7mo ago
that is why I said (display) text inputs maybe I should have called it "natural language text input" text inputs for (non NLP) machines are a special case and for some rare niche edge cases it's not like you can't "
223.
by dathinab 7mo ago
to be fair dogs watching TV isn't really new, people putting up some YT play list or similar is not that uncommon kinda like Netflix and YT have "fireplace" streams or how LG TVs can be setup as "digital picture frames&q
224.
by dathinab 7mo ago
> EM-Dash === AI thing which never should have been a thing, because it was obviously wrong yes AIs is more likely to use em-dash, but that is just one, by itself very insufficient, indicator. it's like hip size. In average over th
225.
by dathinab 7mo ago
never understood why -- => em-dash auto completion is only a think in some subset of application instead of being a standard behavior for (display) text inputs
226.
by dathinab 7mo ago
> this is the point of the "clean room" dance which is the actual relevant part: they didn't do that dance AFIK AI is a tool, they set it up to make a non-verbatim copy of a program. Then they feed it the original software
227.
by dathinab 7mo ago
it's more complicated, the ruling was that AI can't be an author and the thing in question is (de-facto) public domain because it has no author in context of the "dev" claim it was fully build by AI but AI assisted code
228.
by dathinab 7mo ago
> flipping it over. i.e. mirroring it > use it to achieve a very different goal." "very different goal" isn't the same as "fundamentally destroying copyright" the very different goal include to protect
229.
by dathinab 7mo ago
> we'll see that it was an attempt to fight copyrights with copyrights it's not that simple yes, GPLs origins have the idea of "everyone should be able to use" but it also is about attribution the original author and
230.
by dathinab 7mo ago
> Blanchard is, of course, familiar with the source code, he's been its maintainer for years. I would argue it's irrelevant if they looked or didn't look at the code. As well as weather he was or wasn't familiar with
231.
by dathinab 7mo ago
and sending a notification without any (reasonable) form of "has been read/noted confirmation" email is notorious for arbitrarily not being delivered due to "spam/scam" filters misclassifying things
232.
by dathinab 7mo ago
If "usage imply consent" then couldn't you just write unpleasant TOS updates so that they end up in the spam filter and then argue the user complied. sending email + user using does not in any sane way guarantee that the user
233.
by dathinab 7mo ago
he doesn't want news from social media he wants somewhat reliable news and isn't getting them anymore from US news outlets but found them (surprisingly) in the fediverse ---- putting that aside finding news on social media isn&#x2
234.
by dathinab 7mo ago
you are aware that he doesn't actually believe that he "[...] could have convinced [..]" it's a manner of speech a instrument of telling a story a way to express how completely absurd "US getting involved into Green
235.
by dathinab 8mo ago
it's an example for how environmental damages killed a lot of people not so long ago and people just "forget and ignore". I'm not saying it's the same kind of damage. It still is damage, and can kill.
236.
by dathinab 8mo ago
> do it basically "out to sea", far enough away from humans that whatever negative effects are able to diffuse throughout the entire oceans this is not how it works, like at all pretty much all oceans are already at risk of eco
237.
by dathinab 8mo ago
Nuclear power is a pain to build and maintain and un-build once it gets to old to reliable run it (the later part is commonly overlooked in cost calculations). It is also a ~50 year investment. This makes it not very attractive for companie
238.
by dathinab 8mo ago
it actually is a bad idea if you look into the details trees aren't just carbon, they are bio mass/nutrition and if you constantly remove bio mass you sooner or later run into issues (Which we already do in some places, e.g. when
239.
by dathinab 8mo ago
the only crazy thing here is your comment completely ignoring all existing technologies related to that topic to spout obvious nonsense about "cutting down trees and burying them" (which would bind active bio mass which isn't
240.
by dathinab 8mo ago
The current US government is systematically attacking anything which tries to "reduce the effects of climate change" and claims it's mostly all a scam. So no. But what probably also isn't included but should is environme

More ›