dathinab

9 ms·

61.
by dathinab 2mo ago
> Pros: none > Cons: New ways for sociopaths for corruption, embezzlement and censorship. bot points are just plain wrong, to a point where I'm wondering if you intentionally pretend to be ignorant because it's beyond unders
62.
by dathinab 2mo ago
requiring deep fakes to be labeled as deep fakes has nothing to do with censorship there is also nothing selectively about it, it applies to all deep fake equally if you had read the article you would know that this is mainly about deep fak
63.
by dathinab 2mo ago
In general, in EU - law doesn't play "wording nitpicking", "Simon said" or similar nonsense. And this applies here, too. - law doesn't care about what you or any "specific" person thinks something mea
64.
by dathinab 3mo ago
Technically they deceived an officer to delete (potential) evidence for them a duress PIN in a context where they implied it was a normal PIN. But also I don't think a duress pin _usage_ should be legal, _during a lawful search_ (not
65.
by dathinab 3mo ago
just want to point out that I'm happy you comment has been reinstated. my original comment was really just about the irony and the vage formulation wrt. legality was mainly there because I wasn't sure if there might be subtle diff
66.
by dathinab 3mo ago
possible but not necessary evidence, as evidence would imply a crime. But when it comes to police harassing activists, or outright mislabeling them as terrorists, there are many fully legal things you still might prefer the police not to ha
67.
by dathinab 3mo ago
the funny part is he didn't enter the pin he gave it to them and they entered it..., not sure if it makes any difference but there is a certain irony to it that it was the non warrant based search actions (which might be legal at the b
68.
by dathinab 3mo ago
For stacked commit workflows which merge into main with squashing I tend to: - create an empty commit with the branch name, type, ticket number etc. (with a small git script, `git issue 321 fix some things` -> `git switch -c 321-fix-some
69.
by dathinab 3mo ago
if we are nit picking definition then to quote wikipedia: > Capitalism is an economic system based on the private ownership of the means of production and its use for the purpose of obtaining profit this neither implies free markets nor
70.
by dathinab 3mo ago
it sometimes feels (some part of) US citizens are so used to companies systematically abusing them that they think it's normal and some other part seem to have "I have suffered so you must suffer too" mentality and in general
71.
by dathinab 3mo ago
Google knowingly and _intentionally_ breached the law. A fundamental rule for capitalism to work well long term is that oligopoly and similar should not exist and must be rained in or outright split up if they exist. If that rule isn't
72.
by dathinab 3mo ago
I assumed the OP/comment means "software vs. hardware accelerated rendering" when they say "it uses the CPU. And iGPU is still hardware accelerated rendering. But some modern video codecs are designed to work quite okay
73.
by dathinab 3mo ago
Interesting. through, from a pure power POV you probably would want to exclusively use the integrated graphics most CPUs have (1) with the external GPU powered down for most "daily/office-style" usage (browser, news, email, c
74.
by dathinab 3mo ago
putting aside the possibility of very badly implemented token limiting doing requiring our accidentally just doing a reset for whatever reason we (industry) have reached the point where questions about productivity gain, use-cost analysis a
75.
by dathinab 3mo ago
it's a pretty big _international_ problem basically - company cheap mass produces clothes/shoes - new session (1/4 year) comes in (at beast)// it's fast fashion and there is a new trend (at worst) - the "o
76.
by dathinab 3mo ago
> This situation has.. no precedent as far as I can tell.. depending on how you look at it it has quite a bit of precedence as this falls under a long list of MS shipping "intended behavior most security researcher would assign a CV
77.
by dathinab 3mo ago
yes digital piracy was never stealing, but a mixture of contractual breach, copyright infringement and (illegally) causing financial damages through (illegally) causing lost sales. Hence why you don't get tried for theft when you comm
78.
by dathinab 3mo ago
yes, but it was (is?) in many places legal to copy Filmes and Musik albums as backup, and iff the original is lost you can very much sell the backup alongside with the license you did buy (kinda, it gets messy practically). It only mattered
79.
by dathinab 3mo ago
They will argue that, but this is unlikely to hold up in front of court even in the US. The problem isn't it being illegal. But they instead bank on most people not having the means (money/time) or will to sue them over this. Espe
80.
by dathinab 3mo ago
this is a misconception yes, most company settings don't run untrusted code, and OpenBSD is mostly used for servers not employee devices but that doesn't mean LPEs aren't quite relevant, because they matter for pretty much ev
81.
by dathinab 3mo ago
makes me wonder if there is potential for a more "main stream"/by default friendly version of this, where the key during suspend is encrypted using the TPM even if the TPM isn't a possible unlock from cold boot (i.e. no
82.
by dathinab 3mo ago
I mean gov id app really doesn't matter (for now) you can just use you id card which is credit card sized. (For now has things might change wrt. age verification.) But banking apps are a problem. It's not even about the main onlin
83.
by dathinab 3mo ago
EU AI Act got hijacked by huge corpo with last minute changed with moved it from "could probably work" to "catastrophe". Even at 2 December 2027 it might be intentionally not enforced at all due to that for a while, thro
84.
by dathinab 3mo ago
also not fully sure, but AFIK there are limits to how far you can wave this right, in context of things like TOS, simple opt-in fields on forms etc. Like YT would have loved to make you opt out of it (and probably has it in their TOS) but t
85.
by dathinab 3mo ago
this isn't quite how GDPR Article 22 works The is a difference between - having a right you can't wave - which is very similar to something being forbidden - but different to having a right you fully or partially can wave Further
86.
by dathinab 3mo ago
And this + the tendency for AI to "prefer" AI produced code + some other AI biased is why *this is most likely highly illegal to use in the EU due to violating anti discrimination laws in multiple ways. To be clear: - randomly fil
87.
by dathinab 4mo ago
and this should include musics and similar in games (excluding stuff like sessional content) if you sell a game you should have to have bought a license to use the music (and similar) in the game permanently (for given game sold, new sold r
88.
by dathinab 4mo ago
> user house it wouldn't look like that. except it very well might look quite like that. I happen to know such a case and I don't know that many people IRL. Video Gaming became widely available roughly in the 90th in many of th
89.
by dathinab 4mo ago
and you might also end up with 100 people with punk hair stiles, or firefighters or whatever Games are so wide spread through all parts of society and Steam is the largest platform for them, sampling 100 people is fully non representive. Wh
90.
by dathinab 4mo ago
to some degree that is the whole point IMHO there isn't a realistic "typical gamer stereotype" anymore sure you can pick any of the past stereotypes and will find people like that, even many, but it's not "most&quot

More ›