dathinab

60 ms·

631.
by dathinab 1y ago
if you need transaction across a queue into a normal SQL DB or similar I believe you are doing something very wrong. Sure you need transaction about processing things in a queue (mark as "taken out", but not yet remove then remove
632.
by dathinab 1y ago
Honestly whatever kind of DB you are speaking about always be wary of "niche/side features" which don't fit it's core design goals, they tend to have unexpected limitations. listen/notify isn't necessary a
633.
by dathinab 1y ago
> It doesn't seem like the extra traffic is the issue. it really can be, Anubis AI crawler detection was create mainly because of "way to many AI bot requests" to quote > This program is designed to help protect the sma
634.
by dathinab 1y ago
which again comes back to this is a problem which needs regulatory action, not one which should be solved by a quasi monopoly forcing it onto anyone but another quasi monopoly which can use their monopoly power to avoid it require - respect
635.
by dathinab 1y ago
but how could he not have leaned into it - if his analysis of data is correct this _one specific kind of wetter event in this one specific region_ seem to not have happened majorly more or less in recent years - but similar events did happe
636.
by dathinab 1y ago
Yeah, but like another post said it killed a lot of other income streams. And Spotify is a bad example as it ran into another psudo monopoly with very unreasonable/unhealthy power (the few large music labels holding rights to the major
637.
by dathinab 1y ago
they where already big when they systematically broke this laws breaking this laws is what lifted them from big, to supper marked dominant to a point where they have monopoly like power that is _never_ good for everyone, or even good for th
638.
by dathinab 1y ago
definitely not under any circumstances! I mean if you just need someone to listen to and nod, okay, whatever. But even if we ignore how LLMs sometimes can go very unhinged and how LLMs pretending to be actual human personal have already kil
639.
by dathinab 1y ago
stealing with the intent to gain a unfair marked advantage so that you can effectively kill any ethically legally correctly acting company in a way which is very likely going to hurt many authors through the products you create is far worse
640.
by dathinab 1y ago
but it's not some small things but systematic wide spread big things and often many of them, giving US giant a unfair combative advantage and don't think if you are a EU company you can do the same in the US, nop nop but naturally
641.
by dathinab 1y ago
not just Spotify pretty much any (most?) current tech giant was build by - riding a wave of change - not caring too much about legal constraints (or like they would say now "distrupting" the market, which very very often means doi
642.
by dathinab 1y ago
as far as I understand while training on books is clearly not fair use (as the result will likely hurt the lively hood of authors, especially not "best of the best" authors). as long as you buy the book it still should be legal, t
643.
by dathinab 1y ago
no it doesn't has to it just has to be "general" as in it can learn by itself to solve any kind of generic task it can practically interface it (at lest which isn't way to complicated). to some degree LLMs can do so theo
644.
by dathinab 1y ago
I think they are trying to do something like this(1) by long term providing a "business suite", i.e. something comparable to g suite or microsoft 360. For a lot of the things which work well with current AI technology it's su
645.
by dathinab 1y ago
I _hope_ AGI is not right around the corner, for social political reasons we are absolutely not ready for it and it might push the future of humanity into a dystopia abyss. but also just taking what we have now with some major power usage r
646.
by dathinab 1y ago
no it's not don't make up bs in general European law enforcers go to prison if they do so
647.
by dathinab 1y ago
it's as much one standard as OIDC is ;) (as in it isn't one standard but a group of standards, like asn.1 without any encoding is split in ~4 standards by itself. Through to be fair all or CER, BER and DER are in the same standard
648.
by dathinab 1y ago
yes, but that is a different kind of unreadable code then in the blog the blog focuses mainly on putting expresions into unusual positions and how some things have an implicite () type and some an implicite ! type etc. either way if you see
649.
by dathinab 1y ago
yes but to be fair the blog is focused on unusual aspects of everything being an expression you still can create some more confusing things by idk. overloading some operators (but luckily not `=` and similar crazy C++ things) adding recursi
650.
by dathinab 1y ago
assuming you mean returning () (the empty tuple/void type) because it doesn't compose well with generics, macros, proc-macros etc. e.g. if you have this dump way to wrap clone: `fn foo<T: Clone>(v: T) -> (T, T) { let new
651.
by dathinab 1y ago
yes, but less risky (and less power full) because you often very fast can conclude that "whatever it does it's safe, sound and doesn't affect unrelated code"
652.
by dathinab 1y ago
it doesn't need to make sense on a higher abstraction level of logic/semantics I mean you don't see any of the nonsense in the blog post in any realistic PR (so they don't matter), but you would run into subtle edge case
653.
by dathinab 1y ago
> Or shoot him, the law won, and he is dead. if a iron fist rule you shoot them, but sooner or later you will end up with situations where their brother will shoot you, or there is a uprising and they lynch the police chef etc. no one wi
654.
by dathinab 1y ago
what I would like to say: yes, specifically some modern form of feudalism I guess where the new nobles (as in large companies because in US companies are people) can mostly do whatever they want and the rest of the population is struggling
655.
by dathinab 1y ago
there is a huge difference between having strict laws and enforcing them and "ruling with the iron fist" the later inherently implies using violence to suppress people
656.
by dathinab 1y ago
now think about in kernal anti cheat doing that ....
657.
by dathinab 1y ago
I think what they mean is: sequencing a genome [of a new species] is a significant thing
658.
by dathinab 1y ago
no it's a long term incoming failure partially due to legacy of science historically being rooted in "it matters more who you (or your parents) are" societies (due to them having had the money in somewhat modern history) (or
659.
by dathinab 1y ago
ah right, de-found the main source of at lest semi independent scientific advancement just because it has a lot of issues instead of fixing this issues .. always a grate idea I would have though that the common catastrophic failure stories
660.
by dathinab 1y ago
> works only as a [generative] information retrieval but even if we for simplicity of the argument assume that is true without question, LLM still are here to stay Like think about how do junior devs which (in programming) average or les

More ›