dathinab

30 ms·

391.
by dathinab 11mo ago
because it looks like the US is falling to fascism swastika(1) which are symbols of genocide due to hate are no longer "hate symbols" what fucked up times do we live in when we can't even agree anymore that literal nazis are
392.
by dathinab 11mo ago
another problem is - measuring how well a patent office works by how many patents they grant (their purpose is to reject bad patents, it's 100% the opposite of the metrics often used) - a standard where patents are often written with t
393.
by dathinab 11mo ago
> If it's lossy enough that it needs RAG to fix the results is that okay? but then the only way RAG can "fix" the result is if the RAG system stored the song text in it's vector data base in which case the law case an
394.
by dathinab 1y ago
they probably will handle it like with the Steam Deck - no loss - but small profit margin anyway, to max reduce the price, to max increase adoption/reach for Valve people using Steam on non Windows platforms is more important then maki
395.
by dathinab 1y ago
I'm really wondering about the CPU+GPU. Like in some contexts it sounds like a single APU with both. But then it has normal and graphics RAM? So is it 2 SoC? Or one connected to two kinds of RAM? Does the GPU have direct access to the
396.
by dathinab 1y ago
my guess is it will be mostly the same as for the SteamDeck but with - Game Mode becoming getting a not Steam Deck specific desktop version, which I would love to see, e.g. last time I installed Bazzite+Steam Game mode, the Game Mode will d
397.
by dathinab 1y ago
The VR headset isn't and it's cable of both running games standalone and displaying games through the dongle from whatever PC you run.
398.
by dathinab 1y ago
It _really_ isn't absurd. The law doesn't care what technical trickery you use to encode/compress copyrighted material. If you take data and then create a equation which contains it based on it it which can reproduce the data
399.
by dathinab 1y ago
they clearly didn't do that properly, or we wouldn't have the current law suite the lawsuit was also not about weather it is or isn't copy right infringement. It was about who is responsible (OpenAI or the user who tries to b
400.
by dathinab 1y ago
> But creating a derivative work based on the song? 1. it wouldn't matter as derivative work still needs the original license 2. expect if it's not derivative but just inspired, and the court case was about it being pretty much
401.
by dathinab 1y ago
> That's not how laws and regulations work in European or even EU countries yes, even if just looking at other court cases in Germany the role of precedent is "in general" not quite as powerful (as Courts are supposed to f
402.
by dathinab 1y ago
first due to how the EU unified marked works they would have to cut it from all of the EU not just Germany second it probably would be good for the EU and even US as it would de-monopolize the market a bit before that becomes fully impossib
403.
by dathinab 1y ago
binfmt_misc helped me out a lot some years ago I had a build system which was able to cross compile. And a test system which wasn't able to handle cross compiled/emulated/remote code but needed to run test on cross compiled c
404.
by dathinab 1y ago
> provides a nifty way (once the attacker has gained root rights on the machine) to create a little backdoor to regain root access when the original access no longer works so it does imply it needs root rights but it's an example of
405.
by dathinab 1y ago
they mean "mandatory access controls (MAC)" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mandatory_access_control through what exactly people mean with it is often vague Like e.g. both seLinux and AppAmore are technically M
406.
by dathinab 1y ago
oh yes, kinda the norm for musk ideas
407.
by dathinab 1y ago
yes but Musk has claimed he could trivially re-implement the system with more or less only using AI putting aside weather that is true or not and just assume it to be true for the later argument then it is the perfect chance to replace a pu
408.
by dathinab 1y ago
> Are there any reports actually showing degradation because of LLMs rather than post hoc ergo propter hoc? AFIK no nearly all AI features only do any compute if you explicitly ask them to do stuff the only exception is that when you cre
409.
by dathinab 1y ago
sure the smart tab group features are kind useless (but tab groups are grate) but I don't understand why people make such a deal about it it looks a loot like "I don't like this so it mustn't even exist even if some peop
410.
by dathinab 1y ago
except we are speaking about lying under oath, not espionage, you don't get a trail for espionage because you lie under oath and leading management also technically doesn't need to know that is happens for it to be doable. Or in o
411.
by dathinab 1y ago
the data center which runs software written and controlled by the US companies and likely has a 24/7 software related support team which is distributed across the world.... in a modern cloud dater center you don't need someone phy
412.
by dathinab 1y ago
Until this happened MS was still going around trying to convince lawyers to use their Cloud and telling them that there is no issue. Including certain contractual "standard"(1) agreements which would make some of their higher mana
413.
by dathinab 1y ago
> corporate cash flow rather than speculative debt. except that this doesn't quite add up IMHO 1. we have the current _speculation_ on an explosive need of both more data centers and energy if AI has a break through. This investment
414.
by dathinab 1y ago
> but they actually have earnings’ which doesn't mean it's not a bubble a bubble is a over valuation of a industry sector it isn't a "it has no use at all" it's a "the use as big as assumed", &quot
415.
by dathinab 1y ago
mainly people have issues with clear, precise and concise language about intend of action instead of idk. a request of discussion now this is separate from being open for discussion if someone has some good arguments (which aren't &qu
416.
by dathinab 1y ago
non of the listed architectures have official Debian support anymore i.e. they are only still around because they haven't caused any major issues and someone bothered to fix them up from time to time on their own free time so yes, you
417.
by dathinab 1y ago
yes and no yes, from a pure code generation aspect no, as all conditional-compiled platform specific code is missing. So using it with #[no_core] should work (assuming the WIP part of the backend isn't a problem). But beyond that you h
418.
by dathinab 1y ago
sure but most frequent/core contributors for Linux (kernel) and most big Distros are payed by some company with commercial interest which mostly doesn't involve spending time on maintaining any of this old architectures sure some
419.
by dathinab 1y ago
more relevant they are all "unofficial" supported architectures and non in a "might get official support" context, so they all have been of very limited interest of Debian as a whole for quite a while
420.
by dathinab 1y ago
they might run Debian but not upstream Debian/stable you mainly find that with systems needing certification this are the kind of situations where having a C language spec isn't enough but you instead need a compiler version speci

More ›