dathinab

22 ms·

271.
by dathinab 8mo ago
this is mostly not about historic data but about live data Through the way AI companies could "severely/negligent mishandle the data potentially repeatedly destroying innocent people live" is about historic data, tho.
272.
by dathinab 8mo ago
This all loops back to the same thing: you _really_ shouldn't be allowed to train on information without having a copyright license explicitly allowing it "publicly available" isn't the same as "anyone can do whatev
273.
by dathinab 8mo ago
Relevant part: > HMCTS acted to protect sensitive data after CourtsDesk sent information to a third-party AI company. (statement from the UK Ministry of Justice on Twitter, CourtsDesk had ran the database) but it's unclear how much
274.
by dathinab 8mo ago
if you don't track users you don't need GDPR consent dialogs I think in the past you still needed some info box in the corner with a link to the data policy. But I think that isn't needed anymore (to be clear not a consent di
275.
by dathinab 8mo ago
ahhhh, every time the same discussion 1. GDPR consent dialogs are not cookie popups, most things you see are GDPR consent dialogs 2. GDPR consent dialogs are only required if you share data, i.e. spy on the user 3. GDPR had from the get to
276.
by dathinab 8mo ago
> 4. Ceph [...] MinIO was more for the "mini" use case (or more like "anything not large scale", with a very broad definition of large scale). Here "works out of the box" is paramount. And Ceph is more for t
277.
by dathinab 8mo ago
not sure, from the not very representative context of people I know/where I live (not US): Ring customers are often old overly worried people which "don't really care anymore" about ideal (often due to an over exposure t
278.
by dathinab 8mo ago
as interesting side note: geographic "from <> to <>" slogans are very commonly used in such contexts. Basically you take a are geographically split into multiple regions, make a "from->to" slogan which tre
279.
by dathinab 8mo ago
> to use it for propaganda AFIK no But once you do take it over and have no morals, why not also use it for such?
280.
by dathinab 8mo ago
sadly where I live (not the US) most people using ring are the kind of older people which through non stop propaganda about how "dangerous it is" don't have any mind left to consider iff maybe that camera is as dangerous just
281.
by dathinab 8mo ago
> young people are definitely not getting on Facebook but Reddit is mostly relevant "in the west" where most countries have an inverted age pyramid and most old people are not on Reddit, but on Facebook and reddit relevance ou
282.
by dathinab 8mo ago
at most most in the US and also because many modern platforms are app focused and don't care about web traffic and Reddit is a huge target for scrapping int the US so traffic numbers of recent few years have become a meaningless metric
283.
by dathinab 8mo ago
> This experience fits a pattern I keep running into with European business-facing APIs and services honestly, it's a pattern I have been running into with many start ups, fintech, banks and some other places _no matter where_. It a
284.
by dathinab 8mo ago
> Google might be too strict in its filtering they are, but not in this case Message-Id being basically required for _automated_ mails (very similar mail send to a lot of people) requiring Message-Id is a de-facto industry standard. Sure
285.
by dathinab 8mo ago
somewhat, but the question is to broad it differs by country (EU gives countries some similar overlapping laws, but they still are distinct countries with a lot of different practices and different laws in many many ways.) and it differs by
286.
by dathinab 8mo ago
message-id is (or at least was ~5-10 years ago) only required for automated mails, i.e. if you send a mail which looks mostly the same to a lot of users so if you (ab-)use protocols for mail clients to send automated mails they might very w
287.
by dathinab 8mo ago
it isn't a google bug Message-Id being required for automated mails is a de-facto industry standard while the consequences differ between mail provider, it missing will also make it much more likely for mail to be reject or put into th
288.
by dathinab 8mo ago
no, please read the article they forgot to include a message-id something the RFC standard recommend but doesn't require but it being required is a de-facto industry standard for sending automated mails and is clearly documented by sup
289.
by dathinab 8mo ago
yeah, but that RFC isn't the only relevant document Mail RFCs do not cover at all spam detection and malicious mail rejection, but it's a thing every large mail provider has and you really have to care about when producing automat
290.
by dathinab 8mo ago
It is de-facto required and has been for many years. Should in most RFCs also mean "do it as long as you don't have a very good technical reason not to do it". Like it's most times a "weak must". And in that ca
291.
by dathinab 8mo ago
1. SHOULD means, do it if you can/you have to have a really good reason if you don't do it. The only reason it's SHOULD and not MUST is backward compatibility. Mostly in context of "personal send mails", i.e. not au
292.
by dathinab 8mo ago
> but then the obvious question is, for areas where it almost never gets above freezing, why doesn't the snow get infinitely thick? this is how glaciers are created snow getting stuck up, not melting, compressing by weight into muc
293.
by dathinab 8mo ago
ironically sometimes warmer winters are worse like if a typical winter is slightly but consistently below 0C then a warmer winter would have - more black ice - more ice rain - more snow melting and refreezing (so ice on roofs, ground or tre
294.
by dathinab 8mo ago
only to a limit enough snow, especially if compacted, especially if it involves melting + refreezing cycles turning part of it too ice and even robust concrete building can have some surprising issues but it's true that for what most p
295.
by dathinab 8mo ago
This isn't fully true. Snow can be bad enough to a point where even modern cement build building can have trouble. EDIT: I didn't realize A-frame refers to a _very_ steep angle instead of "just" a slightly steeply tilted
296.
by dathinab 8mo ago
It's pretty much a "countries with bad infrastructure" problem. But it can happen anywhere, so you should be prepared anyway. Like I'm living in a city and had a surprise 5 day power outage this winter. And it's not
297.
by dathinab 8mo ago
Part of this isn't just relevant for "heavy snow" places but also for rear emergency situations you anyway should be prepared for. This winter we had a power hick up _and then_ a multi day power outage. > You have a lot of
298.
by dathinab 8mo ago
The think is you 1. add turmeric not color extracted from turmeric 2. you don't add the turmeric just to get the color What this is about is if a company things their rice + turmeric isn't "popping" enough in color they
299.
by dathinab 8mo ago
doesn't need commercial air space lock down, at most private/small low altitude/drone plain lock down
300.
by dathinab 8mo ago
But they didn't block the desert, only air zone and also only directly above the city not beyond it.

More ›