dataflow

4 ms·

61.
by dataflow 23d ago
That sounds awful. This kind of case doesn't seem like something you should let a single person decide on their own, judge or not. Is she not entitled to a jury trial because it's a misdemeanor or something? If she can find the fu
62.
by dataflow 23d ago
> after 1986
63.
by dataflow 23d ago
Ideally an offline copy that can be made read-only with a physical switch. So that when you're trying to restore, you know nothing is going to mess with it. Not sure what the right solution is for something like that.
64.
by dataflow 24d ago
No, all you're showing in that example is that a pointer is passed as part of the ABI. You're not showing that RVO relates to that in any way whatsoever. If you write the same function in a manner that (N)RVO can't kick in, d
65.
by dataflow 24d ago
The point of (N)RVO is to directly construct the return value in-place at the calling frame. Which requires knowing what object will land there. In RVO there is no problem because you know what object is the one you need to put there. In NR
66.
by dataflow 24d ago
> N/RVO works by (at the machine language level, of course) rewriting the function signature to return void and take an extra pointer parameter This sounds wrong, are you sure? Would you mind demonstrating with an example on godbolt
67.
by dataflow 24d ago
Just wanted to amend this to note that what I wrote also applies to the war against ownership, etc... I'm making no attempt to be exhaustive here, just trying to get a larger point across.
68.
by dataflow 24d ago
I'm pretty sure they could support this if they wanted to, which implies they don't want such transactions. And they obviously aren't going to make it easy to get around something they don't want. So we agree on that.
69.
by dataflow 24d ago
> If you can't use their systems for a donation with a sales tax rate of 0%, then per the policy that means you can route users to alternative payment methods for those transactions. So by your reasoning, if donations to OSC are not
70.
by dataflow 24d ago
So I'm only a layperson and don't know what is strictly legally required , but my understanding (based on reading/third-hand information) is that payment processors do in practice end up with more work to do for this, whatev
71.
by dataflow 24d ago
> So you DO know what's going on! In that case I have no idea why you're arguing in favor of having a gate placed in front of our [personal, owned] phones to regulate what we do with our own devices. Then you're not unders
72.
by dataflow 25d ago
This is the stock OS you paid for. It's beholden to Google and subject to their updates as it always was. You can either flash a different OS entirely, or even break their ability to update it before the change rolls out, if that&#x2
73.
by dataflow 25d ago
I agree wholeheartedly, but you can already unlock and root your phone and install whatever you want. This is not that battle. Mind you, I don't like either of these, but they're very different in nature.
74.
by dataflow 25d ago
> Personally for me, a fake convoluted opt-out is the same as no opt out so we're already there. Convoluted, yes, but fake ? Aren't you just repeating the same lie? That means it looks like it bypasses the verification but doe
75.
by dataflow 25d ago
The mere fact that they have to avoid dealing with sales tax here (unlike their typical transactions) is clearly extra complication for them. So you can understand that sales tax being 0% (thus "not taxable") can make things harde
76.
by dataflow 25d ago
> What would be "really bad" for you? "Block[ing] every Android app whose developer hasn't registered with Google, signed their contract, paid up, and handed over government ID. Every app and every device, worldwide,
77.
by dataflow 25d ago
> Aren't donations untaxed? I don't know every jurisdiction, but that's not the only relevant factor. If they are tax-deductible, they still introduce the need for paperwork etc. for the payment processor to let the payer
78.
by dataflow 25d ago
I didn't say it's a question of sales tax collections. I said a payment processor deals with sales taxes. In this case they clearly have to exempt this transaction from sales tax in order to support it, when other transactions thr
79.
by dataflow 25d ago
> Things are really bad already on Android. Most bootloaders are locked, Google prevents you to use the very few unlocked ones through the (legally questionable) Play Integrity. AOSP is basically dead This feels like complaining about th
80.
by dataflow 25d ago
Their emails are confusing, but they came after the alleged violation in private communication, not what you were going from at the time of the alleged violation. If you ignore them momentarily (surely you understand they probably aren&#x
81.
by dataflow 25d ago
> On what planet do you think anyone other than the most dedicated of dedicated people would choose the shop that requires waiting a whole day to use it when the alternative has no such restriction ? I have no clue what you're refe
82.
by dataflow 25d ago
> And for some reason you seem to think it is reasonable to assume it is going to stop here? I really don't. That is, actually, my entire point: people are going to roll their eyes at this right now. And then you're going to la
83.
by dataflow 25d ago
> I'm guessing you've never shown up to a foreign country without a phone. First thing I do after I get through customs is find the phone store. Indeed I have not. In fact I haven't even heard of people doing this until yo
84.
by dataflow 25d ago
> Google's "escape hatch" is a trap door >> Wait 24 hours >> Pick "allow temporarily" (7 days) or "allow indefinitely Geez. I don't like what they're doing either but this fear-monger
85.
by dataflow 25d ago
> Play billing "must not be used in cases where payments include … tax exempt donations" > Note: 501(c)(6) is a tax-exempt status; donations are not tax-deductible for the donor. Google's communications explicitly state
86.
by dataflow 26d ago
Note that that might just be because he doesn't want to say something that might lose supporters, not because he would actually do nothing. (I'm not saying he would definitely do something, just that what he does or doesn't s
87.
by dataflow 26d ago
I don't understand what's ridiculous about that pip CVE, could you explain? Just because something is by design that doesn't mean it's not a vulnerability or somehow unexploitable.
88.
by dataflow 26d ago
I can't speak for your imagination, but this absolutely does come up if you're writing high-performance code. Also note that being able to access arbitrary objects (as opposed to objects in the same array) requires storing two pie
89.
Pentagon installs military influencers in civilian roles(washingtonpost.com)
42 points by dataflow 26d ago|3 comments
90.
by dataflow 26d ago
Probably because most of the time you list branches you goal isn't to discover what exists, but to find the specific one you're looking for.

More ›