Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
dataflow
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
19 ms
·
361.
▲
by
dataflow
5mo ago
Every Windows up to 7 let you pick the classic UI if you preferred that, though, right?
362.
▲
by
dataflow
5mo ago
> The article says that "news are vital". So is open source, films, images, art, and the authors do not get paid by the thieves. "Vital" does not merely mean "important".
363.
▲
by
dataflow
5mo ago
Note, "cheating on assignment or exam during your time at the institution" is a ridiculously broad net to cast. It includes everything from "merely asking one friend on one random night if they got the same numerical answer
364.
▲
by
dataflow
5mo ago
> Everyone is a cheater if they think they can get away with it. I don't mean 50% I mean more like 95-100%. Not convinced of this. I would imagine the majority of people are more likely to cheat if they see the a lot of people getti
365.
▲
Extortion Using Smart Glasses Is a Thing Now
(gizmodo.com)
3 points
by
dataflow
5mo ago
|
0 comments
366.
▲
by
dataflow
5mo ago
Number one economy if you ignore the comical debt. The US is borrowing from the future. Those chickens are going to come home to roost.
367.
▲
by
dataflow
5mo ago
> This is Rust we're talking about. It doesn't even need to work; as long as it compiles, it's correct. No, it doesn't even need to compile. The mere fact that it's in Rust means it's correct.
368.
▲
by
dataflow
5mo ago
I don't see how a library like Enchantum could handle everything reflection does. (How) does it figure out duplicate enum values, for example? And (how) does it discover arbitrarily large, discontiguous ranges? And (how) does it do the
369.
▲
by
dataflow
5mo ago
I'm not really 100% certain this is the correct or only meaning, for what it's worth, so don't take me as authority. It's just the common thread I've been able to gather from context over time. If you're gonna
370.
▲
by
dataflow
5mo ago
I think they mixed up sanctions (and any similar laws w.r.t. legal recipients) with AML laws. The legality of paying sanctioned entities doesn't depend on whether the money was laundered, but they were interested in how people get arou
371.
▲
by
dataflow
5mo ago
I believe the phrase is used to mean something like "the fact that you found something that is obviously an exception proves that the rule normally applies." For example, imagine if your skydiving instructor said "if your par
372.
▲
by
dataflow
5mo ago
>> If you're a prescriptivist, then open-source should be hyphenated for the same reason full-time, user-friendly, long-term, etc. are. That's how English works. > Honestly all of these exist in both hyphenated and unhyph
373.
▲
by
dataflow
5mo ago
What a weird hill to choose to die on. I wasn't even aware of the trend, but I love it now that I'm aware of it; it makes total sense. If you're a prescriptivist, then open-source should be hyphenated for the same reason full
374.
▲
by
dataflow
5mo ago
> I think it depends... if everyone else was treating the counterfeits same as genuine coins, so you're continually getting a mix in change, and no-one is rejecting them when you pass them on, then I think most people would just do
375.
▲
by
dataflow
5mo ago
> very likely to be the most secure mobile OS > IANAL, but anti-competition lawyers/bodies should have a field day with this, but nobody seems to care I'm gonna take a wild guess that proving the above statement in court (an
376.
▲
by
dataflow
5mo ago
> if the supermarket or pub would accept it, then it's effectively money, right? Only long as you both accept the same shared understanding of what it is. If one of you believes it's counterfeit and the other doesn't (whet
377.
▲
by
dataflow
5mo ago
> The database is temporarily down. The server catches the exception and records the key status as FAILED. This is the bug regardless of idempotency, right? It should be recording something like RESOURCE_UNAVAILABLE.
378.
▲
by
dataflow
5mo ago
What made you believe this is the case? any examples/links/etc.?
379.
▲
by
dataflow
5mo ago
The assumption was obviously that they have a compelling need to develop the software. For the sake of illustration: you imagine exposing them to whatever the highest level of risk is that still makes them wiling to develop software.
380.
▲
by
dataflow
5mo ago
NOTE: This is a design document and the feature is not available for users yet. https://clang.llvm.org/docs/BoundsSafety.html
381.
▲
by
dataflow
5mo ago
Sounds dubious, do you have a citation? The disassembly looks very straightforward for a lot of Windows code.
382.
▲
by
dataflow
5mo ago
> Everyone seems to think they are doing the right thing I like to think people would agree more on the appropriate method if they saw the risk as large enough. If you could convince everyone that a nuclear bomb would get dropped on thei
383.
▲
by
dataflow
5mo ago
> Mythos didn’t write 271 PoC for vulnerabilities I think the word you're looking for is exploit?
384.
▲
by
dataflow
5mo ago
If that's what it is, then -- regardless of whether it should be punished or not -- this is manifestly not statistical murder. Your story is describing a situation where one person's decision so strongly and clearly affects numero
385.
▲
by
dataflow
5mo ago
How do you prevent this from being trivially defeated by getting multiple copies of the list and intersecting them?
386.
▲
by
dataflow
5mo ago
> Why does Chromium version lag matter? > users are exposed to known, already-patched security vulnerabilities Then why only focus on major versions? Don't minor versions/revisions have security fixes?
387.
▲
by
dataflow
5mo ago
I could see AI massively changing the calculus here. Its ability to hack and reverse-engineer (even obfuscated) artifacts may leave obscurity (read: not sharing code or binaries at all) as the primary security mechanism in the industry.
388.
▲
by
dataflow
5mo ago
I think it's for all intents and purposes impossible to program like this in this century. Like imagine just writing x + y in C++. Are you seriously going to enumerate every declaration of operator+ in the translation unit in your head
389.
▲
by
dataflow
5mo ago
Okay but... so what? Authentication is a means, not an end. They seem to be missing that what matters at the end of the day is how much money/time/resources actually get lost, and who's on the hook for it. If that's negl
390.
▲
by
dataflow
5mo ago
Yeah. The whole Linux security model seems like it was designed centuries ago. Your permissions are supposed to derive from the authority granted to you at the time of your invocation, and from those with the existing authority to grant&#
More ›