data_maan

9 ms·

61.
by data_maan 2y ago
> Not the same but when you pick something like "Russia must respect the internationally recognized borders" and you don't apply the same for Israel then you are a hypocrite Ahem... You're suggesting that Ukraine kill
62.
by data_maan 2y ago
But the people that now supposedly defend free speech all ARE billionaires. Musk is a free speech absolutist (his words), yet biases his own companies algo to shove more of his stuff down my digital throat. I guess everyone is free to say
63.
by data_maan 2y ago
Does getting other results on Yandex make you trust them more? Is "different" for you "more true"?
64.
by data_maan 2y ago
People will vote for Hitler if you dress him nicely and make him seem to care for your personal problems (Trump die that really well). The thing is - in a fair election media scrutiny applies to all candidates. This guy flew under the radar
65.
by data_maan 2y ago
There are levels to influence. Macron and Trump were widely recognized as candidate before the election. This guy in Romania was at 5%, no one knew who he was, then suddenly he's at 20+%. That's next level. You think that having b
66.
by data_maan 2y ago
How about overturning the result when the elite accepts it, but then discovers that he (or whoever helped him) actually manipulated people via TikTok? It's not really a true people's vote in that case any more, so it seems rather
67.
by data_maan 2y ago
> That's a chronically online take, but it's completely wrong. Immigration demand to the United States is extremely high, even for jobs that don't pay high salaries. I would complement that it's completely wrong as lo
68.
by data_maan 2y ago
> The US, UK, EU and realistically most developed countries I would say have fairly similar quality of life within margin of error. Ahem... Have you seen the standards in the UK get diluted year after year post-Brexit? There's more
69.
by data_maan 2y ago
They didn't demonstrate anything. They haven't even released their dataset, nor mentioned how big it is. It's just hot air, just like the AlphaProof announcement, where very little is know about their system.
70.
by data_maan 2y ago
I agree. But my point is: Neither are UK or the US really clean democracies. In the US there is an entire system of courts that operate in a completely opaque way (eg FISA court). See my other post below for further examples. It seems here
71.
by data_maan 2y ago
I don't buy your arguments. > Parliament was sidelined by giving them a voting list with only one candidate on it (her). This implies that the parliament has to pick on who is on the ballot, which it doesn't: https:/&#x2F
72.
by data_maan 2y ago
How is that true, if the body that nominates the European Commission _is_ elected?? By the same argument you could say UK or US or any other solidly democratic is not democratic, because some commission or organisation is not directly, by t
73.
by data_maan 2y ago
This!
74.
by data_maan 2y ago
Newsflash: the Pentagon has literally _millions_ of bureaucrats. None elected. Unelected people are tasked with defending the free world. how about that?
75.
by data_maan 2y ago
Is that a good thing?
76.
by data_maan 2y ago
Sounds like America suffers from a collective psychosis.
77.
by data_maan 2y ago
So... dumb as rock it is then?
78.
by data_maan 2y ago
> The truth is that we all know that she would say anything to win While Trump wouldn't do any of that, right? He would say things because they're true :D > It was a rather sleepy standard Republican presidency, whose few de
79.
by data_maan 2y ago
[flagged]
80.
by data_maan 2y ago
America now stands in line with various developing nations and sports a convicted felon as head of state. Bravo!
81.
by data_maan 2y ago
Except Trump calls people all kinds of bad things and it doesn't seem to hurt him. Conclusion: You cannot arrogantly call someone a drooling fucktard. But you can call someone garbage non-arrogantly while also being a convicted felon.
82.
by data_maan 2y ago
Voters everywhere are stupid but in the country of exceptionalism, they lately seem to have become exceptionally stu... tolerant!
83.
by data_maan 2y ago
> I don't think the policy positions even matter that much, if you can make a strong case and gain the confidence of the electorate. If this were true it would mean Americans are dumb as rock and don't really care about "b
84.
by data_maan 2y ago
But why would they respond with that information? PE already has a pretty bad press, so they know that customers are calling only because PE is a red flag. They could just serve some meaningless half-truth and try to confuse you.
85.
by data_maan 2y ago
Can you send a paper regarding that LLMs can build "reliable agents"?
86.
by data_maan 2y ago
To all the people complaining here that this company will steal your face and voice: Does that mean you're comfortable when you digitally open a bank account (or even Airbnb account, which became harder lately) where you also have to s
87.
by data_maan 2y ago
If Russians punch way above their weight demographically and are so good at math - how come then that the French have even more Fields medals per capita? Maybe this article was written by a Russian troll farm, as it is essentially claiming
88.
by data_maan 2y ago
With the advent of ChatGPT, universities are becoming more like networking clubs, since for all domains where you don't need a lab, ChatGPT already is often much better than a random lecturer in a class of 300 students that you will ne
89.
by data_maan 2y ago
Have you actually read the paper/know how a ML paper should be written? Here are some of the issues: - section 1.4.3: Can you explain how societal consequences of LLM hallucinations are in any way relevant for a paper that claims in th
90.
by data_maan 2y ago
Just from the way this paper is written (badly, all kinds of LaTeX errors), my belief that something meaningful was proved here, that some nice mathematical theory has been developed, is low. Example: The first 10 pages are meaningless bla

More ›