dartos

13 ms·

121.
by dartos 2y ago
Me too. That resonates really strongly with my feelings. I’m hoping that most people aren’t full steam in AI. I haven’t had any coworkers who just rely on AI… I have had some bosses who do tho…
122.
by dartos 2y ago
You can entirely remove the word “forensics” and my statement would be the same…
123.
by dartos 2y ago
I think forensic analysis of photographs would reveal pretty quickly if they’re AI anyway. AI images of real life still don’t pass intense scrutiny.
124.
by dartos 2y ago
Oh man, don’t look up “vibe coding”
125.
by dartos 2y ago
Most browsers let you extend a page’s css (at least via extensions) I don’t think this would be immune to that.
126.
by dartos 2y ago
> A more risky job should be compensated more? Yea, duh. The more your decisions affect the company, the more you’re compensated. It’s why C-suite commands the biggest salaries. It’s another reason why orgs are so low trust.
127.
by dartos 2y ago
Amen. People’s unawareness of their own personification bias with LLMs is wild.
128.
by dartos 2y ago
Implying for-profit labels care about anything other than profit.
129.
by dartos 2y ago
Yes, they make things faster and easier. My question was what do cars let us do now that we couldn’t before. We moved heavy objects and traveled long distances long before cars.
130.
by dartos 2y ago
Yea
131.
by dartos 2y ago
Shit, you right.
132.
by dartos 2y ago
People traveled almost the entire world and built pyramids before cars were invented. They make it easier and faster, but don’t add new capabilities
133.
by dartos 2y ago
Sure, but I have money on him not living to the end of his term. I don’t think most republicans like trump, he just has a cult following. I also don’t think that any other republican can garner that kind of following. Trump has aura in a wa
134.
by dartos 2y ago
Besides going fast, what does a car allow people to do that they couldn’t before?
135.
by dartos 2y ago
The idea of untangling AI generated typescript spaghetti fills me with dread. It’s as bad as untangling the last guy’s typescript spaghetti. He quit, so I can’t ask him about it either.
136.
by dartos 2y ago
> you really need an army of developers to build a web app or put text onto screen? No, a small team can easily handle that much faster and at higher quality without all the framework bullshit … devs don’t hire the teams… management does
137.
by dartos 2y ago
> 50+ years before another regime change occurs. A little pessimistic, no? People thought the blue wave would never end after Obama was elected. No way to tell what the future holds.
138.
by dartos 2y ago
It doesn’t sound like the type of iteration matters at all. If your leadership is good and competent, they can drive the company any way they feel and have it work. The most productive I’ve been in my career was when my PO put all tasks tha
139.
by dartos 2y ago
I’m not saying just leave everyone to their own devices, but some individuals should be able to have ownership and make decisions without layers and layers of process. Ofc decisions can have consequences, but that’s what the high pay should
140.
by dartos 2y ago
> I wasn't intending to raise concerns over emergent consciousness or similar Oh jeez, then we may have just been talking past each other. I thought that’s what you were arguing for. > That just isn't important here at all.
141.
by dartos 2y ago
It’s honestly probably not that evil.(generally. There are definitely evil orgs out there) It’s just the easiest way to make the stock price go up. Layoffs caused twitter to bump in price. Same with Microsoft when they laid off all those ga
142.
by dartos 2y ago
Got news for you. It’s not the devs who are bloating development costs. It’s the layers of management making hour long meetings to discuss button placement. It’s the hours of retros, design meetings, and skip-levels designed to remove any p
143.
by dartos 2y ago
> What's the mechanistic model of "intention" that you're using to claim that there is no intention in the model's operation? You can’t prove intention, but I can show examples of LLMs lacking intent (as when rep
144.
by dartos 2y ago
I believe exponential (as opposed to logarithmic) advancement would be needed for that to happen. If the improvement curve is linear, it would be prohibitively expensive as and if logarithmic, it’d be impossible.
145.
by dartos 2y ago
> We can't interpret what actually happens when the LLM is actually going through the process of generating a response. There are 2 things we’re talking about here. There’s the physical, mechanical operations going on during inferen
146.
by dartos 2y ago
I’m sorry, but I didn’t understand what you meant on and after the word “juice” I’m not sure any of that was relevant to what I was saying. And you still didn’t answer my question.
147.
by dartos 2y ago
You’re missing the bit where humans can be held responsible and improve over time with specific feedback. AI models only improve through training and good luck convincing any given LLM provider to improve their models for your specific use
148.
by dartos 2y ago
> it's actually been doing exactly what it said it would do to satisfy its base Yes and no. Lots of quick sweeping local changes were promised to specific states during trump’s rallies in those states only for him to go silent on th
149.
by dartos 2y ago
Electron isn’t a google product… Also why bring up disliking something as though you were ahead of the curve only to stop short of actually being in favor of taking action?
150.
by dartos 2y ago
Not OP, but my take: Goodheart’s law states: “ When a measure becomes a target, it ceases to be a good measure” If your accounting is too fine grained, there becomes an inescapable draw to point at a metric and declare that a goal. Once tha

More ›