dartos

7 ms·

31.
by dartos 2y ago
How so? The bitter lesson is about the effectiveness of specifically statistical models. I doubt an expert machine’s accuracy would change if you threw more energy at it, for example.
32.
by dartos 2y ago
Loony toons back in action did the same thing too.i don’t remember it being as good at Rodger rabbit, but it was one of my favorite childhood movies.
33.
by dartos 2y ago
Sure, as a biz it makes sense, but as a society, it’s obviously a big failure.
34.
by dartos 2y ago
Well OC was referring to mass layoffs. That article seems to be about contracted copywriters. If your whole job is writing “150-word descriptions” (the article’s words) for $60 an hour and the like, yeah LLMs got you beat. But that’s a far
35.
by dartos 2y ago
You can’t put an API on everything because it’d take a ton of time and money to pull that off. I can’t think of any technological reasons why every digital system can’t have an API (barring security concerns, as those would need to be case
36.
by dartos 2y ago
> The challenge is to think of another model for creating apps and content The original content model was sustainable for centuries. Customer pays per viewing, and experiences entertainment for an hour or so. Then another model emerged a
37.
by dartos 2y ago
The page refreshes when I scroll 80% down….
38.
by dartos 2y ago
I know 0 devs or UX designers with any real world experience that are sweating. For UX specifically, it makes creating personas so much easier that I think we’ll see a UX once this hype cycle ends. I don’t know or talk to any PMs, personall
39.
by dartos 2y ago
> I've read articles about businesses laying off people specifically to replace them with AI Out of curiosity, were these announcements by AI companies or companies with an interest in AI companies? At lot of articles you read are e
40.
by dartos 2y ago
Sure, why not.
41.
by dartos 2y ago
They won’t. Remember the bipartisan bill to end/reform the H1-B program and that died after Musk tweeted about it? Tech giants make too much money off of H1-Bs
42.
by dartos 2y ago
https://spec.modelcontextprotocol.io/specification/2025-03-2... They mention stdio specifically under the transport section of the spec. Most protocols are transport agnostic, but http APIs tend to require HTTP methods
43.
by dartos 2y ago
I’m writing an MCP DSL and server implementation in elixir.
44.
by dartos 2y ago
> it is definitely a labor of love Some people do things because they like doing those things…
45.
by dartos 2y ago
Right, so hole punching alone doesn’t solve the problem of NAT traversal, which is why TURN and things like it are needed. when I wrote my other comment in my head TURN and STUN were practically synonymous, since I’ve never seen one without
46.
by dartos 2y ago
Oh I guess that’s STUN that does the hole punching. I’m so used to seeing both STUN and TURN together.
47.
by dartos 2y ago
Even if it is mainly about NAT, how else would you do NAT traversal?
48.
by dartos 2y ago
> which obviously happen either way. No? If you don’t drill then the carbon emissions from that drilling don’t happen. I think that fact opens a loophole for carbon credits, actually.
49.
by dartos 2y ago
Is it? You can have a variety and a single largest.
50.
by dartos 2y ago
If they’re already tearing up their back yard, wouldn’t it be strictly more environmentally friendly to buy from them rather than tear up our own back yard?
51.
by dartos 2y ago
> Like a model trained on detecting lesions should perform equally well on ANY X-Ray unless lesions show up differently in different demographics. This is not true in practice. For a model to perform well looking at ANY X-ray, it would n
52.
by dartos 2y ago
Also > Higher in what way? Higher as in at a higher level in the network stack (not exactly, I don’t think, but lower on the same level) Higher as in you can implement MCP on top of grpc. You can’t implement grpc in mcp, that doesn’t mak
53.
by dartos 2y ago
“That document” is the MCP spec. What is says _is_ MCP, regardless of your understanding of it. It’s not a “mandate” it’s a specification for how the protocol works. If the connection isn’t stateful, then it isn’t adhering to the specificat
54.
by dartos 2y ago
There can be differences which statistical models pick up which we humans don’t. For example, a couple years ago there was a statistical model made which could fairly accurately predict (iirc >80%) the gender of a person based on a pictu
55.
by dartos 2y ago
> The dataset they used to train the model are chest xrays of known diseases. I'm having trouble understanding how that's relevant here. For example, If you include no (or few enough) black women in the dataset of x-rays, the m
56.
by dartos 2y ago
Sort of. We don’t precisely know the most fundamental workings of a living cell. Our understanding of the fundamental physics of the universe has some hold. But for LLMs and statistical models in general, we do know precisely what the funda
57.
by dartos 2y ago
I think MCP is a layer higher than grpc. MCP can be implemented on gRPC Mcp is definitely not stateless. It’s explicitly stateful… See the 2nd bullet where it says “stateful connections” [1] And I was saying that with OpenAPI, you need a cl
58.
by dartos 2y ago
Recently, sure, but blender has had a huge, active community for around 20 years. I remember first running into blender in 2009
59.
by dartos 2y ago
> I can’t really see anything that is made better by MCP over OpenAPI Well it’s transport agnostic, for one. I think a big part of it is defining a stateful connection and codifying the concepts of prompts and tools. Another issue with O
60.
by dartos 2y ago
China is the world’s largest EV market. The US is a smaller EV market than Europe.

More ›