darby_nine

10 ms·

91.
by darby_nine 2y ago
> It’s still a bug Only if it's actually possible to remove this behavior. I don't think there's any evidence of that at this point.
92.
by darby_nine 2y ago
Cannot agree enough. Hallucination is a terrible name for this behavior.
93.
by darby_nine 2y ago
> I interpret supernatural to mean religious in this context. TBH I have no clue what the word "religious" means outside of abrahamic faiths. Might as well be a meaningless word. Anyway, the supernatural certainly encompasses m
94.
by darby_nine 2y ago
JUST when you thought the chatbot was dead
95.
by darby_nine 2y ago
Idk about this specific thing, but this is much simpler than it sounds if it operates like other anthropology. Ritualistic means intentional, and supernatural means symbolically meaningful. In other words, this is less of a specific claim a
96.
by darby_nine 2y ago
i don't write understand how that would lead to anything but a slightly different response. How can token prediction have this capability without explicitly enabling some heretofore unenabled mechanism? People have been asking this for
97.
by darby_nine 2y ago
Do either CCL or SBCL have any kind of partial evaluation or tracing compilation?
98.
by darby_nine 2y ago
I feel like crowdstrike is perfectly capable of mounting its own defense
99.
by darby_nine 2y ago
I don't get the distinction. Are you not just searching through chunks?
100.
by darby_nine 2y ago
> the odds are very strong that there's a good reason for that The easiest way to show this would be to give the responsibility of managing the bug bounty to a third party who isn't involved in the business.
101.
by darby_nine 2y ago
"chain of thought" is just search, right? Wouldn't it make sense to tailor the search with heuristics relevant to the problem at hand?
102.
by darby_nine 2y ago
Sure, but companies and shareholders are the most destructive forces on earth. I have a hard time seeing investor tears as anything but a glimmer of hope.
103.
by darby_nine 2y ago
Dockerfiles compose and aren't restricted to running on linux. Those two reasons alone basically mean I never need to care about systemd again
104.
by darby_nine 2y ago
Cool, i don't care about either of these things. Jobs are a poor index of economic health for americans and we should really be guaranteed one as a fundamental human right if we also refuse to implement modern welfare.
105.
by darby_nine 2y ago
Good, let's learn to get along with people without trying to dominate them for the first time in living memory
106.
by darby_nine 2y ago
Seems like a terribly irrational and inefficient way to run an economy but I'm sure russia will invade any day now. Or is it china these days?
107.
by darby_nine 2y ago
Ah, my bad.
108.
by darby_nine 2y ago
Ah yes you're correct, I misread the above comment.
109.
by darby_nine 2y ago
Is this not the legally obligated line of thinking for american companies? You have some leeway to argue with only providing value to shareholders in some specific manner, but not much.
110.
by darby_nine 2y ago
> The auto companies are strategically significant. Not really, they're more politically significant than economically critical. I've certainly never owned an american car and never plan to. We'll be fine continuing to rel
111.
by darby_nine 2y ago
It seems like all their other IP is derived from the game IPs, so I'm a little confused how this leaves Annapurna in a better position.
112.
by darby_nine 2y ago
This is hilarious and rather sad. How did Annapurna fumble such famous talent so bad?
113.
by darby_nine 2y ago
We all know boeing won't be "wrecked"; they're too critical for state interests to be allowed to fail. If they're smart they'll either nationalize the company to remove the profit inefficiency or force the comp
114.
by darby_nine 2y ago
> Are you saying chatbots don't offer anything useful over search engines? That's clearly not the case or we wouldn't be having this conversation. No, but that is the value that's clear as of today—RAGs. Everything el
115.
by darby_nine 2y ago
> The formula for success in any field is simply to make a product that other people want to consume Well, the formula for success in selling products is this. Most people don't define success in terms of business acumen. Except,
116.
by darby_nine 2y ago
You could just as easily argue that model creators don't own the model either—it's like charging admission to someone else's library.
117.
by darby_nine 2y ago
Is intel even in a position to be competitive on the fab level? I was under the impression intel's fabs haven't been "cutting edge" for a long time now.
118.
by darby_nine 2y ago
> Is it the role of a for-profit public company to "support" another for-profit public company? It is (or it can be) if you want to avoid antitrust lawsuits. Same reason Microsoft bailed out Apple in the 90s.
119.
by darby_nine 2y ago
Very fast collapse typically comes with positive evidence of this as people leave their lives out in the open, expecting to return later. Eg see the Roanoke colony in Virginia.
120.
by darby_nine 2y ago
Then it shouldn't be used for secure input.

More ›