dannersy

7 ms·

61.
by dannersy 6mo ago
Of total users 5% is a substantial number of consumers and some would argue a non-trivial amount of market share to ignore when making a product. This also goes without saying that the more adoption we see, the better these alternatives wil
62.
by dannersy 6mo ago
There is little of value in this code.
63.
by dannersy 7mo ago
Even worse, the AI will supply a mediocre version of the source specific to someone else's case, and not getting anything in return, ultimately choking the open source effort. The article touches on this briefly. All I post anymore is
64.
by dannersy 7mo ago
I see a lot less thinking as a result of using LLMs as they are today and I don't see the providers building tools to promote a better way to use them. They are still way too sycophantic.
65.
by dannersy 7mo ago
I mean, that is fine, but then it seems like people at large are not using them "right". I think you'll find that since these tools are convenient and produce a lot of code in terms of lines, that verifying goes out the windo
66.
by dannersy 7mo ago
Except that this product isn't comparable whatsoever to Youtube. Contrary to your point, there are whole businesses popping up because people are paying for search engines due to users feeling that Google's results are insufficien
67.
by dannersy 7mo ago
Yeah, it is wild seeing with my eyes how bad these tools are in a lot of cases. We do have some vibe coders on our team but they basically are banned from my current project because they completely ruin the design and nuke throughput. HN wo
68.
by dannersy 7mo ago
This is insane.
69.
by dannersy 7mo ago
I feel like a crazy person, especially when I read HN. Half or more of the comments on this thread are saying how the game is over for even writing code. Then at my job, I see people break things at a rate I can't personally keep up wi
70.
by dannersy 7mo ago
> People say OpenAI is burning money and is on the verge of collapse. The same people will say OpenAI building an ads business on ChatGPT is "enshittifcation". These people are quite insufferable, no offense to the many who are
71.
by dannersy 7mo ago
The blog isn't even necessarily anti-AI yet the majority of responses here are defending it like the author kicked their dog. The sentiment that developers shouldn't be writing code anymore means I cannot take you seriously. I see
72.
by dannersy 7mo ago
They don't care about good code, but they do pay people a lot of money to care about good code. If the people you hired didn't care, our software quality would be worse than it is. And since people are caring less in the face of A
73.
by dannersy 7mo ago
This is about to get substantially worse as companies introduce more AI into their workflows.
74.
by dannersy 7mo ago
Because if you don't know the language or problem space, there are footguns in there that you can't find, you won't know what to look for to find them. Only until you try to actually use this in a production environment will
75.
by dannersy 7mo ago
Anecdotal evidence, how scientific of you. When I say it's unfounded, I'm saying it hasn't been proven with actual research and data. So when you ask, "by whom?", that's exactly my point, it is unfounded. That&
76.
by dannersy 7mo ago
Agreed.
77.
by dannersy 7mo ago
I think my point stands. Procedural generation is a tool that usually works best when it is supplementary. What makes New Vegas an amazing game is all the hand built narratives and intricate storylines. So yeah, I agree, Starfield is boring
78.
by dannersy 7mo ago
No Man's Sky got better as they were more intentional with their content. The game has more substance and a lot of that had to be added by hand. It is dropped in procedurally but they had to touch it up, manually, to make it interestin
79.
by dannersy 7mo ago
You're cherry picking. The open world games aren't as compelling anymore since the novelty is wearing off. I can cherry pick, too. For example, Starfield in all its grandeur is pretty boring. And the users may not care about code
80.
by dannersy 8mo ago
Let us not pretend that they won't be used for war eventually. If they cave immediately under pressure, then this is an inevitably.
81.
by dannersy 8mo ago
Well, yes. They know what they are doing. They know when given the option the consumer makes the affordable choice. I just don't have to like or condone their practices. Maybe instead of taking on billions of dollars of debt they shoul
82.
by dannersy 8mo ago
No offense, but this is the most predicable outcome ever. The software industry at large does this over and over again and somehow we're surprised. Provide thing for free or for cheap, and then slowly draw back availability once you ha
83.
by dannersy 8mo ago
I am genuinely interested in hearing why we collectively ditched XMPP. I would love to hear someone who has been in the weeds on the development or even just following closely. Edit: Seems someone beat me to it with a good reply.
84.
by dannersy 8mo ago
Whether you view the question as nonsensical, the most simple example of a riddle, or even an intentional "gotcha" doesn't really matter. The point is that people are asking the LLMs very complex questions where the details a
85.
by dannersy 9mo ago
I don't share his experience entirely, by even on my desktop built for gaming I can notice the right click menu is delayed in comparison to Windows 10. Even more heinous, before you remove it, the AI button would lazy load causing you
86.
by dannersy 9mo ago
Yes, they could roll their own, but you have no issues with this being necessary? I think the attitude of "just deal with it" is far more negative than someone expressing they are upset with the state of the internet, its controll
87.
by dannersy 9mo ago
I hope this is a meme because it is wild to me how you don't see this as being a problem. You are contributing to an internet for bots and not people.
88.
by dannersy 9mo ago
Cared about anything other than their own upward movement, actively worked towards my professional development, made sure I had actual, not hand wavey, feedback, and made sure my compensation reflected my growing responsibility. I am aware
89.
by dannersy 9mo ago
No I am not. Your response proves my point in regards to getting bogged down in semantics. In a nutshell, my point is that if we do not care or do nothing when it comes to malicious use of FOSS, you very well may lose FOSS or at least the a
90.
by dannersy 9mo ago
I think you'll find, especially within the tech community, people struggle with purity and semantics. They see that supporting and promoting FOSS is to be okay with its use for war, oppression, or whatever mental gymnastics they need t

More ›