Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
danijelb
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
11 ms
·
61.
▲
by
danijelb
8y ago
> What a pain in the ass it would be if you had 4 different twitter equivalents that you were trying to use.. or try to remember "oh friend A is on twitter1, Friend B is on twitter3" etc. It can be solved with interoperability.
62.
▲
by
danijelb
8y ago
I would like for a more decentralized scenario to win, but it seems to me that people tend to gravitate towards centralization. It happened so many times already that it would be surprising if it doesn't happen again.
63.
▲
by
danijelb
8y ago
I'm pretty sure that eventually, one "winner" app will appear and grab almost all market share, similar to how Facebook has it for social media.
64.
▲
by
danijelb
8y ago
Before CSS layouts, HTML tables were (ab)used for layout and were functionally very similar to what CSS grid is now, except responsive of course. In hindsight, maybe tables for layout weren't wrong.
65.
▲
by
danijelb
8y ago
The only difference between turning off the audio and ad blocking is at which point the data gets blocked. Turning off the audio means that it gets filtered by your phone's audio processing system. Ad blocking means it gets blocked on
66.
▲
by
danijelb
8y ago
I'm one of those that are complaining, but at the same time I pay for Spotify, Netflix and HBO GO, and I didn't pirate almost anything for years. It's not about the cost, it's about their obsession with control. If they
67.
▲
by
danijelb
8y ago
Absolutely, they have right not to serve any customer they don't want to serve. But do they have a right of tracking your actions? How would you react if there was an employee of any broadcast TV station peeking through your window to
68.
▲
by
danijelb
8y ago
Not necessarily. There are free TV channels and free newspapers as well. Spotify is trying to prevent people from choosing which data packets will their devices process or not. Which is exactly the same as a publisher trying to prevent you
69.
▲
by
danijelb
8y ago
Should TV networks try to block you if you don't look at the TV while ads are running? Or if you turn it off/switch channel/mute it? Same goes for newspapers and magazines - do you have a right to skip pages filled with ads a
70.
▲
by
danijelb
8y ago
I wonder what this will mean for Whatsapp's privacy
71.
▲
by
danijelb
8y ago
I agree
72.
▲
by
danijelb
8y ago
Would you react the same if the set came only with pale skin and you had to do the customization for darker skin?
73.
▲
by
danijelb
8y ago
In a weird way, this might be EU's strategy to finally deal significant damage to Google and Facebook, as this law will encourage development of alternatives on decentralized peer-to-peer technologies. However, I'm not sure if EU
74.
▲
by
danijelb
8y ago
So at this point it seems we are going back to how software was developed before web. Clients interact directly with database through a query language. In this case GraphQL is an equivalent of SQL and "custom GraphQL resolvers" ar
75.
▲
A company refuses to hire any smokers
(lime-technologies.com)
3 points
by
danijelb
8y ago
|
0 comments
76.
▲
A Brief Totally Accurate History of Programming Languages
(medium.com)
1 points
by
danijelb
8y ago
|
0 comments
77.
▲
by
danijelb
8y ago
>For me the line is clear - illegal content must be removed, legal content must be left undisturbed, and if Facebook considers law of some country to run counter to their conscience, do not operate in that market. The only problem is, si
78.
▲
by
danijelb
8y ago
You are absolutely right. Hungary is a sovereign country. If they don't like their citizens having access to a particular private platform/medium, they can block access to it. It's very simple. The same way it's done wit
79.
▲
by
danijelb
8y ago
But Facebook is not a worldwide communication channel. It's a social network/community owned by a single company and its shareholders. Internet is the worldwide communication channel. You can "filter" it and make sure it
80.
▲
by
danijelb
8y ago
Why would Facebook have any content moderation obligations towards any government? It is their private platform, their rules. A community they built = their community standards. They can decide what content they allow on the platform. Gover
81.
▲
This is the new Gmail design
(theverge.com)
23 points
by
danijelb
8y ago
|
10 comments
82.
▲
Burger King made a surprisingly good ad about net neutrality
(theverge.com)
6 points
by
danijelb
9y ago
|
0 comments
83.
▲
Finnish bank forbids employees from investing in cryptocurrencies
(yle.fi)
39 points
by
danijelb
9y ago
|
53 comments
84.
▲
Show HN: Capculator–Simple calculator of potential market caps of any cryptocoin
(capculator.co)
1 points
by
danijelb
9y ago
|
0 comments
85.
▲
Instagram now lets you follow hashtags
(theverge.com)
4 points
by
danijelb
9y ago
|
0 comments
86.
▲
Introducing the Uber Visa Card
(uber.com)
2 points
by
danijelb
9y ago
|
0 comments
87.
▲
How I would explain a decade of web development to a time traveler from 2007
(medium.freecodecamp.org)
2 points
by
danijelb
9y ago
|
0 comments
88.
▲
UK Home Secretary ignorantly: “I don’t need to understand how encryption works”
(thenextweb.com)
2 points
by
danijelb
9y ago
|
0 comments
89.
▲
by
danijelb
9y ago
I've been using HN Special Chrome extension since it was released. Can't go back to the standard look. http://gabrielecirulli.github.io/hn-special/
90.
▲
Nest Hello is a smart doorbell with HD video monitoring
(theverge.com)
5 points
by
danijelb
9y ago
|
0 comments
More ›