daniele_dll

9 ms·

1. 31.▲
   by daniele_dll 4y ago

   (I am the main author of cachegrand) I definitely agree, that's why cachegrand puts the focus on functionalities like an on-disk db, which will also be a timeseries db, active-active replication and support for webassembly. In terms of
2. 32.▲
   by daniele_dll 4y ago

   Thanks! My goal is to make it usable enough from the 0.3.0 where I want to have enough Redis commands supported (hashsets, sets, lists, multiple dbs, hyperloglog, etc.), have more memory control and have an MVP of the on-disk database. Impl
3. 33.▲
   Show HN: Cachegrand – a fast OSS Key-Value store built for modern hardware(github.com)

   121 points by daniele_dll 4y ago|55 comments
4. 34.▲
   by daniele_dll 4y ago

   https://github.com/danielealbano/cachegrand :) I am not going to get into what's better and what's not, especially because I haven't released the v0.1 yet and therefore it's not usable, but I am wor