danielam

76 ms·

421.
The Covid-driven centralization of economic power and information control(greenwald.substack.com)
2 points by danielam 6y ago|0 comments
422.
There is just one fundamental thing that exists(wolfson.cam.ac.uk)
3 points by danielam 6y ago|1 comments
423.
Is this the earliest depiction of a dodo in art? (2020)(pursuit.unimelb.edu.au)
1 points by danielam 6y ago|0 comments
424.
The remarkable journey of Leonardo’s inscrutable masterpiece (2019)(pursuit.unimelb.edu.au)
1 points by danielam 6y ago|0 comments
425.
by danielam 6y ago
The Clementine Vulgate is a great example here. You can buy a copy with the Douay-Rheims translation alongside the Latin from Baronius Press, or read it online[0]. [0] http://catholicbible.online/side_by_side/NT/Jn
426.
What Is Religion?(edwardfeser.blogspot.com)
1 points by danielam 6y ago|2 comments
427.
by danielam 6y ago
N.b. in “An Essay in aid of a Grammar of Assent”[0], John Henry Newman makes a distinction between real and notional apprehension that would, I think, be useful here. [0] http://www.newmanreader.org/works/grammar/c
428.
by danielam 6y ago
In my experience, quite well, though I have not had to reach for Java libraries that often, either because Clojure equivalents exist, or because someone else had already put a wrapper around the Java library.
429.
by danielam 6y ago
Clojure fills this gap rather nicely, and you can always fall back on Java libraries, if necessary. If you haven't given it a try, I recommend it. Rich Hickey has put a good deal of thought into its design. Furthermore, you will have a
430.
Biderman’s Chart of Coercion (1994) [pdf](strath.ac.uk)
1 points by danielam 6y ago|0 comments
431.
Just How Dark Were the Dark Ages?(discovermagazine.com)
2 points by danielam 6y ago|1 comments
432.
by danielam 6y ago
Requiescat in pace.
433.
Guillain–Barré Syndrome(en.wikipedia.org)
2 points by danielam 6y ago|0 comments
434.
Free Neo-Scholastic Readings(maritain.nd.edu)
2 points by danielam 6y ago|0 comments
435.
Line Islands(en.wikipedia.org)
1 points by danielam 6y ago|0 comments
436.
by danielam 6y ago
> Your hypothesis on knowing presumes that we have knowledge at all and that rationality leads to truth. So your plan is to rely on some extra-rational means of developing this epistemology? That's quite a feat. Though I shudder to
437.
by danielam 6y ago
If you mean Hume's skepticism toward causation, then all I can say is that, as with all things Hume, he is highly overrated. The presuppositions that his arguments rest on aren't even accepted by most people who, to steal from Str
438.
by danielam 6y ago
> This is an unhelpful nebulous statement, at its worst a circular definition and victim to the Münchhausen trilemma. It is most certainly not circular. We are knowing agents first and know things spontaneously. Only on reflection do we
439.
by danielam 6y ago
That's an excellent question. My road to philosophy was a long one. It took me a while to realize that the kinds of questions I was asking or preoccupied with—often having to do with basic presuppositions and what reality must be like
440.
by danielam 6y ago
> It's best to start with epistemology, epistemology is the foundation for all works in philosophy, which an understanding of is necessary for not only a good rigor but to know what is possible to know, so you don't your waste
441.
Entropy and Diversity: The Axiomatic Approach(arxiv.org)
1 points by danielam 6y ago|0 comments
442.
Lord of the World(en.wikipedia.org)
1 points by danielam 6y ago|0 comments
443.
The Logos (1910)(newadvent.org)
1 points by danielam 6y ago|0 comments
444.
Dupré on the Ideologizing of Science(edwardfeser.blogspot.com)
3 points by danielam 6y ago|1 comments
445.
Declassified Files Reveal a Possible Spy in Poland–Named James Bond(wsj.com)
1 points by danielam 6y ago|1 comments
446.
by danielam 6y ago
> Firstly, this is contestable, and secondly it creates a tautology. I didn't say it was incontestable. I only said that it seems to be the case and that the evidence seems to favor that opinion. It would be more interesting to hear
447.
by danielam 6y ago
> It seems like there is no convincing argument to the contrary either. That jobs are created seems to me to be more convincing, but I leave that as a matter of opinion substantiated only to the degree that I have in my OP. > There is
448.
by danielam 6y ago
Has anyone actually convincingly argued that automation reduces the net number of jobs over time? My impression is that this belief entails a kind of parochialism about job loss, i.e., that it merely tracks the specific kinds or manifestati
449.
Tcl's new paper-like display can also play videos(engadget.com)
3 points by danielam 6y ago|0 comments
450.
Wind Map(windy.com)
1 points by danielam 6y ago|0 comments

More ›