Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
danger
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
9 ms
·
61.
▲
by
danger
17y ago
+1 for this thread
62.
▲
by
danger
17y ago
your idea sounds interesting, but i think it's getting at a different comparison. as presented, the contest is about who can design an algorithm to get the most out of a set (but large) quantity of data. what you're suggesting is where to
63.
▲
by
danger
17y ago
You think you can build a model that is better than the bookies's?
64.
▲
by
danger
17y ago
That sound fun. I think the rule should be a bit more hardcore, though: that the predictions have to come from raw data. i.e., no meta-algorithms that use information about seeding or expert predictions, but if somebody wanted to gather, s
65.
▲
Data for 2009 + 2010 March Madness. Can your algorithm predict the tourney?
(blog.smellthedata.com)
20 points
by
danger
17y ago
|
7 comments
66.
▲
Got machine learning? Prepare your algorithms for data-driven March Madness 2010
(blog.smellthedata.com)
6 points
by
danger
17y ago
|
0 comments
67.
▲
by
danger
17y ago
Great, timely article!
68.
▲
by
danger
17y ago
I've tried that one before and--no joke--the person got very excited, and started going on and on about aliens and life on Mars. I couldn't figure out why until I realized that he had mistaken AI for ET.
69.
▲
Conversation starter: Machine learning in one sentence
(blog.smellthedata.com)
19 points
by
danger
17y ago
|
9 comments
70.
▲
by
danger
17y ago
A few memories of Sam from a Toronto machine learning student: http://blog.smellthedata.com/2010/01/sam.html
71.
▲
Scientific Controversies and Hot-button Issues
(blog.smellthedata.com)
1 points
by
danger
17y ago
|
0 comments
72.
▲
Wine worries? Worry no more
(winetaylor.com)
1 points
by
danger
17y ago
|
0 comments
73.
▲
by
danger
17y ago
Here's a bit more on the subject: http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=846514
74.
▲
Analysis of Nate Silver's Analysis of Oklahoma Student Poll Pollster Fraud
(blog.smellthedata.com)
24 points
by
danger
17y ago
|
1 comments
75.
▲
by
danger
17y ago
SVD doesn't work when you have a sparse matrix as input. You could use some sort of imputation method (like EM) to fill in all of the missing values then run SVD, but this would be extremely inefficient, since only a tiny fraction of the us