dang

24 ms·

601.
by dang 4mo ago
Could you please not post in the flamewar style to HN? We're trying to avoid that here, and we've had to ask you this many times over the years. If you wouldn't mind reviewing https://news.ycombinator.com/news
602.
by dang 4mo ago
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48496396
603.
by dang 4mo ago
We've banned this account for attacking other users and ignoring our request to stop, as well as frequently breaking the site guidelines in other ways. Not cool, and not allowed here. If you don't want to be banned, you're we
604.
by dang 4mo ago
You've been breaking the site guidelines repeatedly. If you keep this up, we will ban you. We already asked you to stop this: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46534572 . There are, unfortunately, many examples of yo
605.
by dang 4mo ago
Please don't do this here. We detached this comment from https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48751006 .
606.
by dang 4mo ago
Can you please make your substantive points without breaking the site guidelines? You broke quite a few of them with this post. You're welcome to express your views thoughtfully, but not aggressively. If you wouldn't mind reviewin
607.
by dang 4mo ago
You're referring to https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48751752 , which was the third submission of this. The original submission was in fact to https://zcode.z.ai/en , so I took that one and re-upped
608.
by dang 4mo ago
Comments moved to https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48753715 , which is by the original submitter of https://zcode.z.ai/en . (I made a fresh copy of their post since the earlier one was too old to re-up.)
609.
by dang 4mo ago
It was quite personal (e.g. "your time you waste on sloppery slops instead of actually reading") and quite aggressive. Moreover, you've been posting like this in other threads as well: https://news.ycombinator.com&
610.
by dang 4mo ago
Sure, and HN hosts many threads where people debate these points. We're not against that and often as not agree with them. But this is a startup launch thread about something unrelated, and hounding someone about an ex-employer is a t
611.
by dang 4mo ago
To sarcastically reword someone's statements using fake quotation marks* to depict them as exploitative is at minimum an accusation of insincerity, and the snark adds an additional layer of aggressiveness. You also used "cognitive
612.
by dang 4mo ago
We detached this subthread from https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48747990 . Please follow the rules at the top of the thread. (I understand that such comments can sometimes be helpful but they can also sometimes be misle
613.
by dang 4mo ago
Please follow the rules at the top of the thread. We detached this subthread from https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48749072 .
614.
by dang 4mo ago
We've moved this one too. Thanks for watching out for fellow users!
615.
by dang 4mo ago
We've moved it. Thanks for watching out for a fellow user!
616.
by dang 4mo ago
We've banned this account. If you want to use a different (non-trollish) username, and commit to following the site guidelines (which you broke with this comment), we'd be happy to unban it. https://news.ycombinator.com
617.
by dang 4mo ago
Can you please stop fulminating and posting flamebait and/or unsubstantive comments to HN threads? All of that is against the guidelines and you have unfortunately been doing them repeatedly. If you'd please review https:/&#
618.
by dang 4mo ago
Thanks! we've made that the main link and put the submitted link in the toptext.
619.
by dang 4mo ago
Related ongoing thread: Fable 5 Is Back - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48752030 - July 2026 (133 comments)
620.
by dang 4mo ago
Related ongoing thread: Claude Fable 5 Promotional Access - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48751978 - July 2026 (63 comments) Recent and related: Department of Commerce has lifted export controls on Claude Fable 5
621.
by dang 4mo ago
I brought up the "generic tangent" guideline because this was a case of how small/specific topics tend to get sucked into the gravity field of big/generic ones, leading to less interesting discussion ( https://
622.
by dang 4mo ago
That's the status quo ante, which didn't work, plus a UI element which most people wouldn't understand. My guess is this would lead to even more offtopicness.
623.
by dang 4mo ago
Appreciated!
624.
by dang 4mo ago
Could you please stop posting unsubstantive comments and flamebait? You've unfortunately been doing it repeatedly, and we already asked you a couple days ago. If you wouldn't mind reviewing https://news.ycombinator.com&
625.
by dang 4mo ago
It's fixed now. Our software follows redirs and somehow we got a 302 to our own IP. Perhaps it is someone's idea of a bot detector?
626.
by dang 4mo ago
Thanks! We'll make that the main URL and put the submitted link in the toptext.
627.
by dang 4mo ago
A launch post is not a place to attack other users personally. Neither is any other HN thread for that matter, so please don't do it here. https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
628.
by dang 4mo ago
A launch post is not a place to attack other users personally. Neither is any other HN thread for that matter, so please don't do it here. https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
629.
by dang 4mo ago
Added above :)
630.
by dang 4mo ago
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48742447

More ›