Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
dandaka
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
5 ms
·
31.
▲
by
dandaka
3mo ago
> calculating the exact discount you get using a subscription could be difficult Why can't you derive this discount from experiments? Example of such research https://she-llac.com/claude-limits
32.
▲
by
dandaka
3mo ago
Can I connect it to my skills/tools? Example case, I have a knowledge base and event log in my company. I need a brainstorm companion, which will have full access to this knowledge, can converse about it and can invoke skills/tool
33.
▲
by
dandaka
3mo ago
Another important benchmark would be — cost per benchmark task using subscription tokens. Since most of us are using subscriptions and cost per token there is quite different from API costs.
34.
▲
by
dandaka
3mo ago
Naming is worrisome!
35.
▲
by
dandaka
3mo ago
Codex, Claude Code, ZAI — they continue work in headless mode, when you close your laptop, if you have connected to remote machine
36.
▲
by
dandaka
3mo ago
What is your top chart? I am using GUI harnesses from model providers and not happy with any of them.
37.
▲
by
dandaka
4mo ago
Every country is moving in that direction
38.
▲
by
dandaka
4mo ago
Imagine you only know how to cook (use fry pan skill) and know how to cook omelette (recipe). You get the task to cook doner kebab. How many Wikipedia pages do you need to read to get a good understanding? I guess its max 5. I think groundi
39.
▲
by
dandaka
4mo ago
Model can use tools to get that knowledge. In your example, read Wikipedia page about table tennis. Imagine a reasoning engine with a big enough context, that knows nothing. A path built from first principles to understand "table tenni
40.
▲
by
dandaka
4mo ago
Take mathematics as an example. Humanity has found math notation, which allowed to express math rules — distill them to the core. Before math was expressed in prose — a very inefficient way, very similar to current LLMs. In my school, math
41.
▲
by
dandaka
4mo ago
I think this is a well known concept, which we can't deliver yet. LLM/transformer give us reasoning engine as a byproduct of its design, but it is quite ineffective. If we can distill reasoning, if reasoning can be achieved withou
42.
▲
by
dandaka
4mo ago
"Free AI" will not fight existing knowledge or strong opinions. It will spread to empty spaces. Example with blood test — there is no podcaster there and will not be.
43.
▲
by
dandaka
4mo ago
AI will not help by improving extremely smart people. AI will help dumb people and dumb processes with "free" expert-level intelligence. Anyone could still ignore intelligence and make ignorant decisions. But the default mode woul
44.
▲
by
dandaka
4mo ago
How fast is it going to expand to other markets? Asking for a friend obviously
45.
▲
by
dandaka
4mo ago
Going from crypto to fiat and back is an extremely monitored and regulated route. It might be an easy way to settle between counterparties, but a difficult one to launder.
46.
▲
by
dandaka
5mo ago
I imagine the best distribution model like this. We split all tickets in 2 buckets 50/50: 1/ Sorted. Some buyers have priority. They can be sorted by price paid, by amount of minutes listened, depends on the sale. 2/ Random w
47.
▲
by
dandaka
5mo ago
You are cooking them wrong. You absolutely must ask the model to do grounding work — search online, search in your files, cross-check with different agents. They are universal reasoning engines, not a fact recalling tool. Check my 'dee
48.
▲
by
dandaka
5mo ago
It is called 'jagged intelligence'. A lot progress was made in the last 2 years. Most notably reasoning models, tools use, harness progress. It takes time to build the skill to make those models useful, but they do provide a lot o
49.
▲
by
dandaka
5mo ago
In my experience, current agentic workflows are so slow, that for many cases it only makes sense to run them in parallel. So a lot of context switching. If we could have 10-100× faster token generation, we could have task delivery at the sp
50.
▲
by
dandaka
5mo ago
Not sure I follow your point. The fact that humankind grew from 5M to 8.3B, while dramatically improving longevity and quality of life speaks volumes. Multiply life quality × population × life duration, not only "misery and destruction
51.
▲
by
dandaka
5mo ago
Do we have a list of open problems? Would love to see a chart, where AI solves such problems one by one in the upcoming years.
52.
▲
by
dandaka
5mo ago
10000 years ago we had 10-15% deaths from violence (skeletal evidence). As well as infections, child mortality, starvation and injuries. Benefits of civilization eliminated most of that + increased quality of life dramatically.
53.
▲
by
dandaka
5mo ago
We can reach a different situation 1/ No one knows how even small components work, because their inner working mechanism is too hard to understand by human mind 2/ The whole society is run (in intelligence sense) by alien minds
54.
▲
by
dandaka
5mo ago
The goal is not to record activities of others, it is to have full context of operator activity. More like a personal knowledge base, that camera pointing to a cop.
55.
▲
by
dandaka
5mo ago
why not? if context stays on device and operator is in full control, what downsides are there? there is no observer here, only operator and full context of his activity at his fingers
56.
▲
by
dandaka
5mo ago
Next generation of OS should have constant video and audio recognition by on device LLM. This will provide valuable context for a lot of scenarios. So instead of frequent copy-pasting we are used to, we can let agents access context of our
57.
▲
by
dandaka
5mo ago
How many times we have to hear again about Erdös problems? :) It sounds like a great achievement for humanity at first, but after a while they keep coming back!
58.
▲
by
dandaka
5mo ago
why can't we simply raise the bar for posting? I remember semi-open platforms, where you were invited, had to earn the right to post comments and posts. and you could easily lose those rights when downvoted. its seems strange in the AI
59.
▲
by
dandaka
5mo ago
wtf, how do you even get consent before contact?
60.
▲
by
dandaka
5mo ago
I hope they collaborate with open source harness providers (Pi, Opencode) and train models with those. So next generations will have better integration and better overall quality.
More ›