dambi0

10 ms·

151.
by dambi0 3y ago
That answers what proportion of your mail was trash.
152.
by dambi0 3y ago
Perhaps you and the officer had different perspectives on the threat models under which revocation of radio encryption keys might happen? Maybe there are additional controls in place?
153.
by dambi0 3y ago
What about dresses repurposed into non-dresses prior to their dusty demise.
154.
by dambi0 3y ago
What proportion of your trash is made up of mail?
155.
by dambi0 3y ago
Can you elaborate on what you mean by appearance in the first sentence? Also cognition. Is this the same as understanding or is thinking a better synonym? Can you think of any examples from before say 2010 where there would be any reason fo
156.
by dambi0 3y ago
International football being one exception to this.
157.
by dambi0 3y ago
It could just as well be the worst of both world too though. Loss of physicality and constraints because of unlimited virtual paper combined with notes you can’t read because of handwriting. I prefer your optimism though.
158.
by dambi0 3y ago
A safe, a personal cipher, someone you trust to destroy things when you are dead? It depends on what you are concerned about.
159.
by dambi0 3y ago
Do you have a list of profanities that you share with your guests before they enjoy your hospitality?
160.
by dambi0 3y ago
Does your confusion arise because you are generalising a specific definition of agency.
161.
by dambi0 3y ago
Not impossible that I misread the article, but isn’t one of the points that the theory can’t be explicitly encoded in the code? Again, perhaps I ought to reread it, and I don’t disagree with the general thrust of your comment.
162.
by dambi0 3y ago
Might the context not be that armed police in the UK are only used for especially significant incidents and that these may or may not be determined solely on the likelihood of possession of firearms by non-police?
163.
by dambi0 3y ago
How would you encrypt / authenticate the URI? Assuming TLS adding this dependency to configure SSH may not be that desirable in some cases. The original SSH threat model allowed for MITM, so you’d have to also allow for that happen to
164.
by dambi0 3y ago
Suggesting clarification to suit your imaginary inferences seems puzzling. The parent post pointed out that perspectives on authorship have a historical precedent, I didn’t see the value judgement your reading suggested.
165.
by dambi0 3y ago
What specific risks do you foresee with this approach?