dalmo3

32 ms·

451.
by dalmo3 4y ago
Okay, there's a victory screen now, which didn't show the first time I played.
452.
by dalmo3 4y ago
I don't get it. The numbers add up to 128. Then what?
453.
by dalmo3 4y ago
Terrible idea. Even the most relaxing bgm you can find becomes super annoying if playing the video at higher speeds.
454.
by dalmo3 4y ago
I don't know anyone who would do that for free, but there are tons of paid services that do just that. E.g https://logicaldollar.com/test-websites-for-money/
455.
by dalmo3 4y ago
Learning to tie my shoelaces at the exact length where you can easily slip the feet in and out but the shoes won't fall off. Buy shoes, tie once, 1000x return.
456.
by dalmo3 4y ago
You're all wrong. The plural of octopus is hexadecipus.
457.
by dalmo3 4y ago
There are 3rd party sites for just that. E.g https://kennytilton.github.io/whoishiring/
458.
by dalmo3 4y ago
Issues. As a frontend dev if I'm stuck at something I'm 10x more likely to find relevant info in gh issues than on SO.
459.
by dalmo3 4y ago
Is photosynthesis a requirement for life?
460.
by dalmo3 4y ago
> If you throw construction materials up 1 quadrillion times, how many times can they randomly fall in the form of a house? It depends on what you call a house. It will probably never fall in any given expected shape. It may very well fa
461.
by dalmo3 4y ago
Surely that's factored in in "per woman"?
462.
by dalmo3 4y ago
> Our results are consistent with younger people being generalist repeat consumers who do not often look for very novel music compared to what they know, but the music that they do know is relatively broad. Older listeners are specialist
463.
by dalmo3 4y ago
I think "sort by recent" or filtering are considered "non-algorithmic" in this space.
464.
by dalmo3 4y ago
As for a book, Priceless by William Poundstone is an excellent read.
465.
by dalmo3 4y ago
If the preprocessors can remove the ambiguities, so could the browsers. If the concern is speed, then just stick with the status quo (my preference, but sadly not an option in the poll).
466.
by dalmo3 4y ago
The simulation clearly lacks a garbage collector.
467.
by dalmo3 4y ago
> If somehow humans or human ancestors You probably meant descendants, but that just made your comment delightfully coherent.
468.
by dalmo3 4y ago
Plot twist: it was WebAgency's plan all along.
469.
by dalmo3 4y ago
I don't think a German user writing "pile of cookies", in English, would be disappointed with "English" results. Is that any different than what you get on, say, Google? Try prompting craiyon for "Ein Stapel
470.
by dalmo3 4y ago
That's actually a great example. Just think of the aggregated human-hours wasted to bring those people together, create that setting, photograph, edit, publish... All for a meaningless flyer or landing page.
471.
by dalmo3 4y ago
So you're saying they can't just do it?
472.
by dalmo3 4y ago
That's not redundancy, that's multiplexing!
473.
by dalmo3 4y ago
> Immediate feedback through a failure state https://www.devolverdigital.com/games/disc-room
474.
by dalmo3 4y ago
About 15 times longest than the tallest one. Best five minutes I've ever spent scrolling (on mobile).
475.
by dalmo3 4y ago
Nah, I actually won the game (Democracy 3) by building a libertarian utopia with zero taxes, no public services, ignoring the clamor for new laws etc, and had all KPIs on green. Then was killed by a nun who disagreed with my no-state-religi
476.
by dalmo3 4y ago
Cook, Serve, Delicious 1 and 3 will give you hundreds of hours of ~fun~.
477.
by dalmo3 4y ago
> This is sad, because the question evaporates into the aether Whatever happened to spectrum.chat? I know, GitHub killed it. But the real question is why no one else seems to be able to build an indexable chat platform?
478.
by dalmo3 4y ago
There's a fundamental flaw with the solution proposed in the documentation (getLayout as a function), which could be fixed by using a pure JSX approach: https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/36029
479.
by dalmo3 4y ago
> inform users that the image has been enhanced and improved They could just add a statement to their ToS that all photos on the platform have been algorithmically enhanced and/or compressed.
480.
by dalmo3 4y ago
It's 2022 and people are still doing "imagine you had $100" studies? And people still consider anything that comes out of this sort of study as evidence ?

More ›