dakolli

12 ms·

331.
by dakolli 6mo ago
Its technically limited to 200 emails per domain. But yes, this is the way.
332.
by dakolli 6mo ago
I've been using cloudflares remote browser api to bypass their own WAFs for my scrapers for a while, their products and services have been wildly contradictory for a while.
333.
by dakolli 6mo ago
Trivial for the spammers that need this service to build this, surely they already have.. this agentic hype cycle is way more annoying than NFTs/Crypto, which I thought was impossible.
334.
by dakolli 6mo ago
fomo/hype, not revenue. Google's AI business is a profitable business model and training to inference is vertically integrated. Their AI biz did not add 1T to their market cap, despite their much more advantageous position. A 1T v
335.
by dakolli 6mo ago
Genuinely curious, what are you "fine tuning" these smaller models to do reliably? I hear this talked about a lot but very few people actually cough up examples, and I'd love to actually hear of one.
336.
by dakolli 6mo ago
yet, still mostly useless.
337.
by dakolli 6mo ago
They aren't even close to a 1T company, they're valued at <400bb and that's at like a 20x-30x multiple. They can probably raise money at a higher valuation but its literally just value based on hype, not revenue.
338.
by dakolli 6mo ago
Why would this be useful in a zero sum environment like markets, why would you want to use the same tool that everyone else has access too? Top performers will always be the people that hand craft their solutions, just like why the top perf
339.
by dakolli 6mo ago
pro LLM people are the kings of ad hoc fallacy. Why did you type this? You can consistently test steel and get a good idea of when and where it will break in a system without knowing its molecular structure. LLMs are literally stochastic by
340.
by dakolli 6mo ago
Good, pro AI people produce poor quality in everything they do. They are the least creative and worst problem solvers. I don't want them near me or my work.
341.
by dakolli 6mo ago
LLMs really can't do as much as you people think they can.
342.
by dakolli 6mo ago
> there are lots of people in the world who live their whole life by vibing. It's a viable way to live and sometimes it's the only way to live. But they have a very loose relationship with truth and reason This response 1000%
343.
by dakolli 6mo ago
of course the idea of self is emergent You sound really sure of yourself, thousands of ML researchers would disagree with you that self awareness is emergent or at all apparent in large language models. You're literally psychotic i
344.
by dakolli 6mo ago
It is a stateless text / pixel auto-complete it has no references of self, stop spreading this bs.
345.
by dakolli 6mo ago
Ahh I see. I guess when I turned off privacy settings and allowed training on my code, then generated 10 million .md files with random fantasy books, the poisoning worked. Keep using AI and you'll become a goblin too.
346.
by dakolli 6mo ago
NO AI !
347.
by dakolli 6mo ago
This is a great blog, I love the I Built a WebAssembly Runtime in 5 Days Because I Was Tired of Paying for Cloud Run [1], . You do a great job at showcasing your creativity for solving problems. I can tell that you genuinely got a lot of
348.
by dakolli 6mo ago
they legitimately suck at everything they don't have concrete examples to copy from.
349.
by dakolli 6mo ago
another llm user exhibiting the behavior of a gambling addict "That table is cold this week" "that machine is't hot, you wont win on it" Every month llm users are coming up with reasons why they think the model is u
350.
by dakolli 6mo ago
This indicates they want this behavior, they know the person asking the question probably doesn't understand the problem entirely (or why would they be asking), so they'd prefer a confident response, regardless of outcomes, becaus
351.
by dakolli 6mo ago
You know they are 1000% training these models to draw pelicans, this hasn't been a valid benchmark for 6 months +
352.
by dakolli 6mo ago
ToKeN PrIcEs ArE gOiNg tO PluMmEt, InTelLigEnCe WiLl Be AfForDaBlE FoR EvErYOnE
353.
by dakolli 6mo ago
When did I say to stop using computers? You don't prefer to think for yourself? You're cooked.
354.
by dakolli 6mo ago
It a terrifying path we're taking, everyone's competency is going to be 1:1 correlated to the quality and quantity of tokens they can afford (or be loaned).. I prefer to build by hand, I also don't think its that much slower
355.
by dakolli 6mo ago
I get what you mean but they're all over twitter, its not random levels of enthusiasm, follow a few heavy llm users who tweet a lot and you'll see what I mean.
356.
by dakolli 6mo ago
Its because llm companies are literally building quasi slot machines, their UI interfaces support this notion, for instance you can run a multiplier on your output x3,x4,5, Like a slot machine. Brain fried llm users are behaving like gamble
357.
by dakolli 6mo ago
They don't want competition, they are going to become bounty hunters themselves. They probably plan on turning this into a part of their business. Its kinda trivial to jailbreak these things if you spend a day doing so.
358.
by dakolli 6mo ago
Its funny watching llm users act like gamblers. Every other week swearing by one model and cursing another, like a gambler who thinks a certain slot machine, or table is cold this week. These llm companies are literally building slot machin
359.
by dakolli 6mo ago
Its the same as cyrpto/nft hype cyles, except this time one of the joke projects is going to crash the economy.
360.
by dakolli 6mo ago
HTMX > Live View

More ›