Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
dahcryn
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
7 ms
·
61.
▲
by
dahcryn
1y ago
another episode of Microsoft just buying time
62.
▲
by
dahcryn
1y ago
in some ways, are they not able to run their own apps on the iOS ecosystem to support extra features? My sony headphones claim they do all kinds of magic stuff through the app, but I guess that's not a realtime feature, more like a reg
63.
▲
by
dahcryn
1y ago
yeah indeed, regression testing for chatbots that use RAGs would involve making sure the correct response comes from the RAG. Today we have a extremely hacky workaround by ensuring that at least the desired chunk from the RAG is selected, b
64.
▲
by
dahcryn
1y ago
It would be great if this evolved slowly during the progression of the game lol
65.
▲
by
dahcryn
1y ago
if they use AzureSearch, I fully understand it. Those things are hella expensive
66.
▲
by
dahcryn
1y ago
I just... dont understand why you dont hear them coming? Do people with varia use headphones or something? I don't have issues being aware about upcoming traffic, in either city traffic or rural environments. The only exception would
67.
▲
by
dahcryn
1y ago
Indeed. I feel so weird reading this discussion section. My home server is on a 5600G. I turned it on, installed home assistant and jellyfin etc... , and since it has not been off. It's been chugging along completely unattended, no wor
68.
▲
by
dahcryn
1y ago
arxiv should really have a big red banner "NOT REVIEWED - DON'T USE AS A SOURCE" or something
69.
▲
by
dahcryn
1y ago
even AI does not have a concrete definition. Doesn't mean there aren't practical definitions depending on the context. In essence, teaching an AI using recources meant for humans, and nothing more, would be considered AGI. That co
70.
▲
by
dahcryn
1y ago
LLM is far from the highest AI related cost, so we basically don't care about optimizing LLMs. Obviously we don't use the super expensive ones like GPT4.5 or so. But we don't really bother with mini models, because GPT4.1 etc
71.
▲
by
dahcryn
1y ago
well, as someone working in a department that also has Fraud detection responsibilities, the amount of users that lose tons of money because of scam apps, spoofed apps, identity stealing apps, is big. Like insanely big. I am all for it that
72.
▲
by
dahcryn
1y ago
your compensation is speed, you get to go home faster. Is that not enough?
73.
▲
by
dahcryn
1y ago
you'd be surprised how many people steal small valuable items and hide it by doing normal shopping and having a normal shopping cart for their other items. That expensive 30 dollar bottle of shampoo for example, in the handbag, and jus
74.
▲
by
dahcryn
1y ago
but it's been proven time and time again, that any form of fraud of theft, leads to at least 3x more in the future. If they get away with it, they never stop, and just keep stealing more and more. Most never hit any repercussions. Yet
75.
▲
by
dahcryn
1y ago
you kill off all open source pieces, in turn compliance is happy, and a CTO is happy because he has a maintenance contract and can blame other people if stuff goes wrong. It's a way to get those pesky Python people to shut up Oh, and a
76.
▲
by
dahcryn
1y ago
because it's recommended by nearly all consultants and Microsoft. Simple as that, it's consulting Heaven. Much like SAS and SAP. Everybody happy. Now to be far to databricks, if used properly and ignore the cost, it does actually
77.
▲
by
dahcryn
1y ago
yeah where IT blocks half of the config, and you disable half of the features that could make it great, just to make sure they definitely don't give control to..GASP... A DATA ENGINEER
78.
▲
by
dahcryn
1y ago
I don't think there is anything out there that really bundles everything exactly like databricks does. There are better storage solutions, better compute and better AI/ML platforms, but once you start with databricks, you dig your
79.
▲
by
dahcryn
1y ago
it really is the most expensive I've ever came across. It would be a flatout no-go if it weren't for Microsoft pushing everyone onto this platform, supported by their network of really absolutely neutral Gartner friends and Deloit
80.
▲
by
dahcryn
1y ago
it's by design, Ryanair never buys from the factory AFAIK. They buy secondhand, they are basically scalpers of the second hand market, always on the lookout for a good deal. That mitigates the risk of buying untested tech with first-it
81.
▲
by
dahcryn
1y ago
most low cost airlines are on 737 actually. I guess the strategy for Vuelling is definitely to go more after ryanair and other holiday carriers. Some MBA types might also see the opportunity to lay off experienced expensive Airbus pilots an
82.
▲
by
dahcryn
1y ago
It's a great idea, but it's been killed off by the small print that was lobbied into the requirements Basically, banks force apps or users to require you fully revalidate user consent every 90 days. And it's quite an annoying
83.
▲
by
dahcryn
1y ago
you are missing the most obvious one, no? Sum both lists and take the difference, that's the missing number, since the items are guaranteed unique
84.
▲
by
dahcryn
1y ago
this scares me. The last thing we need is cheap consulting messing with open source projects. I don't want TCS and Accenture developing libreoffice or stuff like that and turn it into shit
85.
▲
by
dahcryn
1y ago
sending files over email is just extremely common, staying lower than 15mb is almost a requirement to facilitate easy communication in many businesses Also, I tend to have OneDrive sync my active projects, including the steerco and update s
86.
▲
by
dahcryn
1y ago
To me the interesting idea is the followup question: Can you do complex reasoning without intelligence? LLM's seem to have proven themselves to be more than a one-trick-pony. There is actually some resemblance of reasoning and structur
87.
▲
by
dahcryn
1y ago
that's not how that works. Money doesn't mean "I built whatever I want and Postgres will evolve into whatever I want by pushing my code". They still need to align and plan. Sure, they'll build the things and contrib
88.
▲
by
dahcryn
1y ago
it also doesn't help that many of these companies tend to either limit the context of the chat to the 10 most recent messages (5 back and forths), or rewrite the history summarized in a few sentences. Both ways lose a ton of informatio
89.
▲
by
dahcryn
1y ago
built in a time where cost was not really an issue. Human labor was cheap, scale and complexity lower (from an engineering point of view, just add more stones until it looks good), and inflation wasn't really a thing so bulk was possib
90.
▲
by
dahcryn
1y ago
yes it does. If software is implicitly built on wrong understanding, or undefined behaviour, I consider it rotting when it starts to fall apart as those undefined behaviours get defined. We do not need to sacrifice a stable future because o
More ›