Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
dahart
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
56 ms
·
961.
▲
by
dahart
2y ago
Ah yes, this is the functional definition of the min/mean/max continuum, thanks! So does this have applications in statistics, and is it ever used to produce a distribution of random variables?
962.
▲
by
dahart
2y ago
Where can I find Red Delicious varieties from back when they were considered good? I remembered them being fine/decent/whatever when I was a kid, and recently just out of curiosity bought some Red Delicious from a local grocery st
963.
▲
by
dahart
2y ago
Meh, he’s a comedian, not a food writer. Some of the taglines are maybe over the line, but a lot of them are funny, and all of them are in jest.
964.
▲
by
dahart
2y ago
Ah, fascinating, I’ve never used Order Statistics. It doesn’t look exactly like what I was thinking, but there is also a continuum from min to median to max, similar to min to mean/sum to max. I’m not sure but I might guess that for th
965.
▲
by
dahart
2y ago
Parent is suggesting that sleeping must be good on the macro level. That does imply that it must also be good for the animal, right? In order to statistically benefit the population, the benefits to any given animal must statistically outwe
966.
▲
by
dahart
2y ago
Either I haven’t seen this before, or forgot it, but it’s surprising because I use the sum of independent uniform variables every once in a while — the sum of two vars is a tent function, the sum of three is a smooth piecewise quadratic lum
967.
▲
by
dahart
2y ago
So I’m still left curious which debuggers are much better than VS? What do you mean about so slow there are semantic implications? How does execution speed change meaning? Can you give an example? And are you talking about VS specifically,
968.
▲
by
dahart
2y ago
I don’t like working in Visual Studio much, and I am a big fan of gdb too (and of Chrome’s debugger when working in JavaScript), but for C++ debugging, the Visual Studio debugger is excellent, and has been near the top of the class for a lo
969.
▲
by
dahart
2y ago
It’s an interesting question & thought experiment! To the degree that it even matters compared to all the other bigger forces, I would put money on riders naturally adjusting for CoM changes by riding slightly higher during the turns; I
970.
▲
by
dahart
2y ago
I maybe erred on the side of supportive as well, for the same reason, some perceived lack of support as kids. My parents weren’t entirely unsupportive, but I’d wanted a little more support at times and all the parents around me at the time
971.
▲
by
dahart
2y ago
Why is that interesting to you? Do you have a contrasting point of view to share? Do you have experience with startups and/or venture capital? I have no involvement with YC, but with a little startup and VC pitching experience, I can t
972.
▲
by
dahart
2y ago
> it’s just hard to impossible to scale that The phrase “hire people smarter than yourself” is a platitude that is intended to foster an attitude, just a useful way of framing & thinking about people, mainly aimed at the manager, but
973.
▲
by
dahart
2y ago
> That you can write a "compute shader" once, and it will run "anywhere." Can you post a link to that quote? What exactly are you quoting?
974.
▲
by
dahart
2y ago
Why are you bringing up Godot again? Are you worried Godot will be left behind or unable to compete with Unity? Are you working on Godot? Why are you focused exclusively on games? What are the ‘false promises’ of WebGPU, and why do you thin
975.
▲
by
dahart
2y ago
It seems like you’ve jumped to and are stuck on a conclusion that isn’t really supported, somewhat ignoring people from multiple companies in this thread who are actively using WebGPU, and it’s not clear what you want to have happen or why.
976.
▲
by
dahart
2y ago
I’m still not sure what the point is. WebGPU is an API, is that that you mean by middleware? What’s the issue? Apple will do their own thing, and they might not allow WebGPU on Safari. What bearing does that have on what people using Linux,
977.
▲
by
dahart
2y ago
For that matter, why would you expose your CPU to a website? Or your monitor? It could show you anything ! ;) Maybe you are not be aware of the number of good web apps that use some WebGL under the hood? You might be using office applicati
978.
▲
by
dahart
2y ago
Responding to your pre-edited comment. > whom is WebGPU for? […] it’s a huge rigamarole. Where is this comment coming from? WebGPU enables compute shaders, and there are applications in anything that uses a GPU, from ML to physics to aud
979.
▲
by
dahart
2y ago
Oh there are lots more axes than just the 3 aliasing, sharpness, and locality ones. Those are the main tradeoffs for a pixel sampling or convolution filter choice, when downscaling an image, say between nearest neighbor vs bilinear vs Mitch
980.
▲
by
dahart
2y ago
I don’t quite understand where this is going nor why. This little sub-thread stemmed from a good tool that does already exist, and from unsubstantiated claims that C devs are students and that the simple build steps are too hard for most pe
981.
▲
by
dahart
2y ago
There’s probably a way to get a stable conservative error bound for a parallel sum reduction that’s non-deterministic. Here’s the PBR book’s chapter on error analysis. It’s way easier to implement error bound tracking than it is to come up
982.
▲
by
dahart
2y ago
> That's autodiff! :D The error (change) in a function's output given an error (change) in its input is the definition of its derivative Ah but the error of your autodiff math isn’t the same thing as the error of the function y
983.
▲
by
dahart
2y ago
“Our collection include sincere art in which something has gone wrong in a way that results in a compelling, interesting image.”
984.
▲
by
dahart
2y ago
The Higham book does work toward error analysis of matrix multiplies, it would be useful to see how that’s done. In the case of autodiff, you do presumably know the exact computations that are done, there just might be so many of them that
985.
▲
by
dahart
2y ago
Just to pick some nits with those claims… CPUs do have hardware support for functions in the form of a stack and CALL/RET instructions. Functions are a useful abstraction since more or less all software uses them. Functions and functio
986.
▲
by
dahart
2y ago
> More generally, relative error works only if your computation scales “multiplicatively” from zero; if there’s any additive component, it’s suspect. IEEE floating point inherently scales from zero, the absolute error in any computatio
987.
▲
by
dahart
2y ago
You’re not alone with this story, other people have shared similar stories. There are even a few very famous cases, like when the Homebrew maintainer complained about being rejected by Google https://news.ycombinator.com/ite
988.
▲
by
dahart
2y ago
> sometimes (usually) we just picked a magic tolerance out of thin air that seems to work. Probably worth mentioning that in general the tolerance should be relative error, not absolute, for floating point math. Absolute error tolerance
989.
▲
by
dahart
2y ago
You can get the stack effect in your story, if that’s what you want, without imposing it on your sentences. There is a strong and not always correct belief that saving surprises to the end is both fun and clear to the reader, that everythin
990.
▲
by
dahart
2y ago
Come and visit makes it sound like they traveled to be there, where just visit might be the neighbor stopping by. It’s subtle and ambiguous, but I do see valid use for come and visit.
More ›