Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
dagmx
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
9 ms
·
121.
▲
by
dagmx
8mo ago
Or you’re not considering that the Windows laptops have significantly larger battery sizes. The review units for PTL are up to 50% larger battery capacities than the Mac’s they’re being compared to.
122.
▲
by
dagmx
8mo ago
Well there were still the historical arm32 chips in their iOS devices, but until recently the watches were a cursed arm64_32 (or something like that) which is arm64 with 32 bit pointers iirc.
123.
▲
by
dagmx
8mo ago
Again, the Panther Lake devices here are the top end of Panther lake comparing against the base level M5. See the chart here for what the intel SKUs are: https://www.pcworld.com/article/3023938/intels-core-ultra-se
124.
▲
by
dagmx
8mo ago
Which still come out behind other than multi core, while using substantially more power. Those panther lake comparisons are from the top end PTL to the base M series. If they were compared to their comparative SKUs they’d be even further be
125.
▲
by
dagmx
8mo ago
It wouldn’t matter because the whole OS would be evicted from memory and the entire storage encrypted. Signal itself wouldn’t even be detectable as an app
126.
▲
by
dagmx
8mo ago
Whomever scanned it , enabled some kind of OCR correction which left the typos.
127.
▲
by
dagmx
8mo ago
How would you hide that? Unless you’re assuming nobody ever has to try and fix bugs or audit code to find it, and there’s some kind of closed off area of code that nobody thinks is suspicious. Or you maintain a complete second set of the ap
128.
▲
by
dagmx
8mo ago
There’s definitely areas where I agree Swift is more ergonomic. Parameter defaults, and null short circuiting are two of them. I find writing Swift is faster for me, and it’s easier to learn for people than Rust. Also Swift interop with oth
129.
▲
by
dagmx
8mo ago
What hardware are you using? My Mac’s seem to handle large amounts of avif just fine without chugging.
130.
▲
by
dagmx
8mo ago
How do we know those people have both a system with hardware support and a decoder that uses it. Without specifics of hardware it’s hard to know.
131.
▲
by
dagmx
8mo ago
1. How does one say that webm is the de facto standard? It’s common but not so ubiquitous that it can’t be replaced easily. 2. AVIF is a better codec with better compression, bit depth and hardware decode support.
132.
▲
by
dagmx
9mo ago
Why would he need to be pardoned to inspire copycats? Why wouldn’t his death cause him to become a martyr and inspire others? Why would he be pardoned by the governor at all? Why do you believe Hunter Biden being pardoned is on the same lev
133.
▲
by
dagmx
9mo ago
Why should either of them get the death penalty?
134.
▲
by
dagmx
9mo ago
macOS on Apple Silicon officially supports running iOS apps directly. There’s no magic trick to it really from the developer side, Epic just ticked the opt-out to prevent it being available on the App Store.
135.
▲
by
dagmx
9mo ago
1. I said “one of the predominant”, that there are other frameworks ahead of it doesn’t mean it’s not in the top set of UI frameworks. Especially for native apps and automotive / medical use cases. 2. I think you might be living in a b
136.
▲
by
dagmx
9mo ago
It’s not perfect but if that’s your standard, then that cuts a lot of stuff from both languages :-) I’m not sure why annotations are a bad thing to you. They’re not necessarily swift specific and could benefit other bindings too, and their
137.
▲
by
dagmx
9mo ago
There are definitely languages that work well with UIs. I’m not sure how you can make that clear cut a statement? C++ and Python map extremely well to Qt which is one of the predominant UI frameworks. ObjC maps really well to AppKit/UI
138.
▲
by
dagmx
9mo ago
I disagree that rust can be as ergonomic. I’ve been writing rust for longer than Swift , and there’s a lot of niceties in Swift. Default parameters, null shortcircuits, lazy static initializers, computed properties, ease of binding to C++,
139.
▲
by
dagmx
9mo ago
He specifically says he likes Rust, just not for GUI app development. He also puts that on himself rather than blaming the language. Which is not a hot take by any means, even in the rust community. A lot of UI based app paradigms don’t map
140.
▲
by
dagmx
9mo ago
Swift is pretty good. As a language, I really like it. It feels very much like a cousin to Rust with a few tradeoffs to be more ergonomic. The standard library is pretty good but the extended ecosystem is not as strong outside of Apple plat
141.
▲
by
dagmx
9mo ago
I think it’s a reasonable default if Microsoft weren’t able to access your encryption keys. Apple has that figured out. Your keys can be stored in your cloud synced keychain but only you can decrypt that keychain. That’s why they couldn’t h
142.
▲
by
dagmx
9mo ago
Why would you expect Apple to have the keys? They famously fought the FBI on the grounds of not having access to the keys themselves. Good engineering practices say that you shouldn’t even find yourself in the position of having the keys. A
143.
▲
by
dagmx
9mo ago
Your question as stated is exactly why there are so many pointer types. Is it a pointer to raw memory or a pointer to a type? Does it have a known size? Should it be allowed to be changed? These are all questions you have to answer in C but
144.
▲
by
dagmx
9mo ago
> so much because they realize they'll likely keep their existing low-level system+embedded code rather than port it to Swift I disagree. I think it’s more that it reduces the burden to port to swift. Of course there’s some stuff yo
145.
▲
by
dagmx
9mo ago
If you’re talking about embedded inside DNG, then you’re talking roughly a maximum of 14 bits. There’s not really much capture beyond that , whereas this + the other formats I listed provide 16 bits. That’s quite a significant jump
146.
▲
by
dagmx
9mo ago
Is it possible you didn’t comprehend which parts were 3D? Or if you did, perhaps a critique is better rather than just a low effort diss.
147.
▲
by
dagmx
9mo ago
This is pretty cool. There’s a dearth of higher bit depth formats that are also compressed. EXR and TIFF are really the only ones most people use but this opens up a fairly interesting option now for use cases where size is important. Does
148.
▲
by
dagmx
9mo ago
There’s quite a few creative hobbyists and freelancers. In a past life, I’d have fallen quite squarely in the latter and I still fall in the former. Given this also extends to my family, it feels like a no-brainer replacement for creative c
149.
▲
by
dagmx
9mo ago
They specifically said “not a service” and you brought up a service.
150.
▲
by
dagmx
9mo ago
Good thing they remain free and pre installed. As per the article.
More ›