daenz

78 ms·

691.
by daenz 5y ago
>Based on your statement I would assume your suggestion is "they shouldn't be free to have their own rules and do what they want" because...? That question is better asked of PradeetPatel, the person who wants to figure ou
692.
by daenz 5y ago
They're free to have their own rules and do what they want? That's going to make a lot of people very angry.
693.
by daenz 5y ago
It's small, but imagine an account with 10,000 bots interacting with it every day. It would appear extremely active, and you wouldn't see the same username twice unless you were really paying attention.
694.
by daenz 5y ago
cool, thanks for responding and congrats on your accomplishment! i love innovative tools like this.
695.
by daenz 5y ago
It appears that some accounts are losing lots of followers. Are these people all quitting Twitter? https://socialblade.com/twitter/user/hillaryclinton https://socialblade.com/twitter/user&#
696.
by daenz 5y ago
If those numbers were padded by fake accounts, it does.
697.
by daenz 5y ago
I really hope Elon does something financially irrational with Twitter that would benefit everyone. For example, really turn it into a online town square by nationalizing it somehow, so that speech is guaranteed protected like it is out in t
698.
The way that this script runs forever should scare you(gist.github.com)
1 points by daenz 5y ago|1 comments
699.
by daenz 5y ago
Very cool, and no doubt a difficult to accomplish feat. But it's unclear how useful it is. The author has a comment in this thread that "in some situations a full reload still might be needed", which makes sense, but also sev
700.
by daenz 5y ago
For me to consider using it, the company would need to have millions of users, a large team of highly credentialed security engineers working on ensuring it is not vulnerable, and 6-figure bug bounties. If your unproven company can't b
701.
by daenz 5y ago
Trust in the original authors' code is only half of the attack surface. The other half is trust that no future contributors are malicious. Is the project more capable than Google in ensuring that malicious code can't land in the c
702.
by daenz 5y ago
Not only that, but review every single commit forever. It's just not realistic.
703.
by daenz 5y ago
Congrats on your accomplishment! However, I will never use it because a browser is one of those really important information gateways that I want to be very sure is not compromised.
704.
by daenz 5y ago
I don't think it's very good to saboteurs.
705.
by daenz 5y ago
How do fights and conflicts work out? Surely under the stressful conditions of a sub, people have conflict. And keeping that conflict hot can't be good for everyone. Are the personality types less prone to conflict, or is there some ge
706.
by daenz 5y ago
Sounds like he knew he was about to be part of this person's all-in-good-fun humiliation. Entertainment like that cannot be passed up!
707.
by daenz 5y ago
The level of trust is to be expected from a company like this imo. We're in an information war all around us. Spies, saboteurs, etc, are all part of a war, and we just witnessed a coup of leadership.
708.
by daenz 5y ago
Yep. I imagine Twitter has a employee base with a very strong activist streak. I'm sure some of them wouldn't mind martyring themselves to make a virtuous statement.
709.
by daenz 5y ago
If it feels similar to a fluid simulation, that's because it is how many grid based fluid simulations are computed. They take into account density, pressure, velocity, divergence, etc, of neighboring cells, and compute the state of the
710.
by daenz 5y ago
I've seen people who are angry about Musks actions say that they're going to be the most toxic, anger-inducing, irrational users they can be to test his limits of speech. Some people just want to watch the world burn because they
711.
by daenz 5y ago
Some do. Other companies expect you to derive the algorithm from scratch if you haven't seen that one. If you don't know the algorithm, then question is over. It's unreasonable to expect someone to derive in 10 minutes someth
712.
by daenz 5y ago
It's so amusing how interviewers pose questions that took PhD students years to invent the answers to. Just say you want me to memorize some algorithms and their time+space complexities, and regurgitate them on command.
713.
by daenz 5y ago
>The article says that they faked 500 of the tests The article says that they faked at least 500 of the tests.
714.
by daenz 5y ago
I remember there was a conversation about this from some of the managers. It was basically, "we don't know if things will go south, so we need to operate as normal." It did definitely feel wrong.
715.
by daenz 5y ago
That seems to answer it on face value, unless the prices quoted for blood panels are very inflated due to insurance. EDIT>> Maybe a punch card? Donate N pints, get a free blood panel.
716.
by daenz 5y ago
It looks like it's just tested for different diseases. I'm more referring to my different blood metrics (cholesterol, CBC, CMP, hormones, etc)
717.
by daenz 5y ago
I used to donate blood regularly. I would donate more regularly if I got a full blood panel with each donation. I've been quoted $600-2500. Surely you can comp that for me if I give you a pint.
718.
by daenz 5y ago
If making a mistake benefits your enemies, your enemies can hardly be blamed.
719.
by daenz 5y ago
After conducting an interview, before I had a chance to write my review (which was customary, while it was fresh), I was sat down by someone more senior than me who said, explicitly "we are hiring this person." There was a &qu
720.
by daenz 5y ago
You're genuinely asking about the most extreme and uncharitable interpretation of the GP's post? Your question sounds like "If we should be kind to everyone, what about serial killers?" It is so out-of-place in the pictu

More ›