daenney

67 ms·

661.
by daenney 10y ago
That matters a lot. Inconsistent history is a problem and leads to all kinds of communication issues and misunderstandings. You said you agreed on A No I edited it later to say that I meant I was in favour of B Oh, I never saw that edit...
662.
by daenney 10y ago
> like edition of messages (with a flag marking it as edited) This works on Slack but only with their client. Use one of the bridges and you have no clue what's going on and they have a centralised system for this. Syncing that some
663.
by daenney 10y ago
What's the advantages by doing it through the IETF? > IRC (current version) works fine for me. The trick is to front it with ZNC or similar software. But ZNC actually uses a bunch of IRCv3 features.
664.
by daenney 10y ago
> The IRCv3 Working Group is a collection of IRC client and server software authors working to enhance, maintain and standardize the IRC protocol using backwards-compatible extensions. It's not a new protocol.
665.
by daenney 10y ago
To be honest, I kinda like the image. It might not be great to you but it has a nice spooky fantasy air to it to me. As to wether it should be considered a good picture, I have no idea.
666.
by daenney 10y ago
Certainly? How so? I'm also very curious about the monopoly. iOS has an estimated 13% market share.
667.
by daenney 10y ago
But nothing requires you to link directly to the font on their CDN. The sources, the whole build pipeline, everything is available and you can host it all by yourself. The font they created has nothing to do with tracking you, it just so ha
668.
by daenney 10y ago
> Heck just don't use it. That really is not a viable option when you want to access content which happens to (now) be behind Cloudflare.
669.
by daenney 10y ago
You appear to assume that companies don't change in 15 years. Considering the past 15 years where Apple was almost dead and Microsoft couldn't ever be a company contributing to and open sourcing many things I'm not sure that
670.
by daenney 10y ago
> It is completely possible to do what they are doing by keeping everyone's individual privacy intact. And if I go by Google's ToS, that's exactly what they are doing. Could you give examples of how that can be achieved a
671.
by daenney 10y ago
And how does that relate to the fact that banks would like to have a weaker version of TLS 1.3? If a nefarious entity is stealing your data they're (probably) MITMing your connection with the bank, in which case TLS 1.3 is likely an im
672.
by daenney 10y ago
Ha, interesting, I wouldn't have guessed that. Could you elaborate a bit on how you tested and measured it? Would be useful to know for the next time I try to name a thing.
673.
by daenney 10y ago
Though it's great to see these kind of efforts why did you pick a name that seems bound to cause discoverability and visibility issues?
674.
by daenney 10y ago
I'm a bit worried by the reliance on email to validate aliveness. If something were to ...happen... (ominous music playing in the background) it's possible that such an entity could gain access to my inbox, allowing them to sidest
675.
by daenney 10y ago
That people are dumb, for whatever definition of dumb we feel like adhering to today, does little against the fact that someone promoting their extension as a security mechanism goes above and beyond to try and get you to install some malwa
676.
by daenney 10y ago
In that same spirit there's also BitTorrent (BT) Sync: https://www.getsync.com . Seems it's branded as Resilio nowadays.
677.
by daenney 10y ago
That little overlay on the site that tells you how many minutes of reading you still have left I find infuriating. It disappears the second I stop moving and gets right in the way when I start scrolling. Especially when you increase the fon
678.
by daenney 10y ago
You don't need to be a great athlete in order to be fit, which is what this is about.
679.
by daenney 10y ago
For every repo I fork I usually add a remote named upstream pointing to the original. So then, whenever I need to get my copy up to date with upstream it's: update = !git fetch upstream && git merge upstream/master&#
680.
Spotify's component-driven UI framework for iOS(github.com)
1 points by daenney 10y ago|0 comments
681.
New Galaxy Note 7 reportedly explodes in China, burns customer’s fingers(arstechnica.com)
2 points by daenney 10y ago|0 comments
682.
by daenney 10y ago
I think this could be pretty neat, it'll be interesting to see how it evolves. However, looking at the comments people have left here I would suggest putting up a table/comparison with InnoDB side by side, detailing which features
683.
by daenney 10y ago
Sure it's nice to boycott them but doing it this way has the (slim?) potential of getting that change reverted, restoring full functionality/compatibility to current customers. That said, I really do want to see someone compile th
684.
by daenney 10y ago
That's all great and dandy for you and the few people inside your circle of influence but there's a bajillion people on the internet, using all kinds of devices, for whom this is impractical to impossible. Even getting this kind o
685.
by daenney 10y ago
You forget things like certificate pinning which can make sites inaccessible for long durations of time if the user doesn't visit said website during this transition period. I'm not super convinced about the user security argument
686.
by daenney 10y ago
They're not "killing" anyone. They have reasonable doubt that the CA has misrepresented the truth and engaged in practices that violate the rules set forth by the CAB and those for inclusion in the Mozilla trust store. There
687.
by daenney 10y ago
> - How much less secure is it to not use a passphrase on a key? This is a question of layers. If you don't have a passphrase on your key, what stops someone from gaining access to it? Just your account password? If they steal your
688.
by daenney 10y ago
Why not? Granted the passphrase are in one place but as long as your password store doesn't get compromised managing to brute force a key's password then only gives you access to the machine(s) that one key is accepted on. Also, t
689.
by daenney 10y ago
This isn't about load testing though. This is about getting some more useful information out of doing a request from a CLI, which can be a very handy way to see if there's an indication of a problem with an endpoint or a specific
690.
by daenney 10y ago
Agreed. I've had access to a few of their courses, they're pretty awesome. I know it sucks for people with disabilities and Berkeley should invest into making it accessible to everyone, but it would be a loss for everyone if the c

More ›