da39a3ee

55 ms·

871.
by da39a3ee 5y ago
With VSCode you can develop on mac with your code in a docker volume, so no need for the code syncing that you're referring to.
872.
by da39a3ee 5y ago
The definition of terrorism isn't a "threat to national security". For example, your country could do something evil and wrong, grievously and unjustifiably violating the interests of an entity with a military, and be deserve
873.
by da39a3ee 5y ago
It sounds like you want something easy (PaaS). I’m using render.com. A similar one is heroku.
874.
by da39a3ee 5y ago
Just a little note: if you are using clojure then you’ll need your machine set up with Java. That’s the important consideration here; it’s not relevant whether you’re using javascript or not because that’s all sent to the client’s web brows
875.
by da39a3ee 5y ago
I'm very conscious of the fact that to some people twitter is highly attractive and somewhat addictive whereas to others (including myself) it doesn't seem to appeal at all; or rather, I have a nagging feeling that maybe I should
876.
by da39a3ee 5y ago
I'm sorry, I should have explained the jargon here. A "monophyletic" set of organisms is defined to be a set for which there exists a common ancestor, which ancestor has no descendents outside the set. (Try to ignore sexual r
877.
by da39a3ee 5y ago
Similarly, from the rust stdlib docs for process::Command let hello_1 = echo_hello.output().expect("failed to execute process");
878.
by da39a3ee 5y ago
Why would anyone expect “trees” to be monophyletic?
879.
by da39a3ee 5y ago
Nope. If you actually look at the biological / evolutionary biological literature you’ll find that there is no shortage of people who have thought deeply about biological ontology. To get you on the right track, most biologists agree t
880.
by da39a3ee 5y ago
I'm certainly attracted to getting more experience of FP / a lisp in production (as opposed to a lisp in my text editor). However, > Previously working with TypeScript has made me miss types and appreciate the runtime checks of
881.
by da39a3ee 5y ago
Ohhh right, thanks! I did see that HN discussion so I should have spotted the github1s URL. Lots of fun tricks going on...
882.
by da39a3ee 5y ago
Wow, this is impressive and quite crazy! Ok so how does the VS Code thing work? I browsed the source (in VS Code in your website of course) and found the VS code component but I didn't quite understand -- it seemed to just be an iframe
883.
by da39a3ee 5y ago
Right, so that's relevant to a minor incidental comment I made. But what do you think of the main points, which are (a) If you write the message the way you suggest the printed error message is misleading, and (b) The Rust community do
884.
by da39a3ee 5y ago
> Judging by how most people write code today, I find this idea terrifying. Writing code is not a single activity, it is a modern means of communication and information transmission. Code is written for a vast range of purposes, some bet
885.
by da39a3ee 5y ago
OK, that would be nice but...what you're saying just doesn't work! The user gets an error message saying thread 'main' panicked at 'foo invariant upheld' And everyone, except those who are inured to the
886.
by da39a3ee 5y ago
That reads as "I expect this to be already validated". Is that what you intended it to mean? Similarly, foo.expect("There was a problem and I had to crash") That _reads_ as "I expect there to be a problem and
887.
by da39a3ee 5y ago
I'm afraid I felt that the spaced repetition questions on quantum country were a complete waste of time. There I was struggling (a lot!) with trying to work out how on Earth to think about C^2 (the space of 2-tuples of complex numbers,
888.
by da39a3ee 5y ago
I think that there's still time for Rust to reverse the .expect(...) naming mistake. It should be deprecated, either introducing something with an appropriate name like .unwrap_or_panic(...) or just leave it to be replaced by .unwrap_o
889.
by da39a3ee 5y ago
The work looks awesome. I am really really unconvinced that any teams should be reviewing patches by email like this when we have excellent PR-based workflows and interfaces. I know these people are 1000x better C programmers than me, but I
890.
by da39a3ee 5y ago
This is in need of some context. What is a Dark Pattern and why is it capitalized?
891.
by da39a3ee 5y ago
Ah, thanks for explaining that so clearly and thoroughly. You're right that I was forgetting hooks. (And I learned something else from what you wrote -- that often a library will have it's triggered function merely enqueue a task.
892.
by da39a3ee 5y ago
With respect, I think you're confused. But even if I'm right, that's OK, software is complicated, and it took me a while to get these things straight. Multiple installed emacs packages do not execute their code simultaneously
893.
by da39a3ee 5y ago
TBH the emacs-plus install didn't work for me (the Emacs.app produced failed with `LSOpenURLsWithRole failed`), whereas build-emacs-for-macos did work.
894.
by da39a3ee 5y ago
> but once you activated all the quality-of-life features and added a bunch of third-party packages, there was a noticeable performance impact. I'm not sure I understand what you mean there. Unless those third-party packages are sch
895.
by da39a3ee 5y ago
brew install emacs-plus@28 --with-native-comp might be a more standard "easy" approach on MacOS.
896.
by da39a3ee 5y ago
Given an installed emacs, what's the best way to check whether it was built with this feature and that the feature is active?
897.
by da39a3ee 5y ago
Your question comes across as uncharitable and I suspect you have no relevant experience. Without implying that your question has any validity, if you have an academic career, you need publications. Therefore it's the opposite of what
898.
by da39a3ee 5y ago
> The build failing intermediate commit is no longer valuable. At times what you say will be correct, but it's not at all obvious that what you say is always correct. Suppose that subsequently the authors of the fix in question have
899.
by da39a3ee 5y ago
Suppose (a) You suddenly realize that the production code in the main (not deployed) branch is incorrect (b) There is no test coverage for the bug (c) You have time to commit a test reproducing the bug, but a fix will take days. In this sit
900.
by da39a3ee 5y ago
> You have to do it yourself. You have to research things yourself. You have to hunt for doctors & specialists yourself. This is one of the key things that establishes that Americans who don't see the problem with their healthca

More ›