d1sxeyes

8 ms·

61.
by d1sxeyes 5mo ago
I think you’re mostly right that people don’t think in those terms exactly, but “oh if they build more housing traffic will be a nightmare” or “it’s already hard enough to get into the good schools” or “I can’t even get a doctor’s appoint
62.
by d1sxeyes 5mo ago
Good point. Building more housing is indeed part of a possible solution, although it’s hard to convince folks whose mortgages are baselined on inflated prices not to oppose building more.
63.
by d1sxeyes 5mo ago
Absolutely yes, but there's a bit more nuance than it seems. For example, 40 years ago, most families had one car, no computer, no mobile phones, no Netflix, DoorDash, etc. Houses are bigger, foreign holidays, expensive white goods, et
64.
by d1sxeyes 5mo ago
I don't think 'the law' does clearly state that, although I'd be happy to be proved wrong, and honestly it's a point of pedantry, the enforcement indicates that you're right about the actual expectation, and de
65.
by d1sxeyes 5mo ago
Imagine a similar sticker saying 'service of papers is not permitted at this address'. Should USPS be required to respect that owners wishes here? Sensible decision I think.
66.
by d1sxeyes 5mo ago
- When I was a kid mums worked part time or not at all. This is a big factor. Although the gender side of things is kind of loaded, it used to be broadly the case that a two-parent household would often have one primary breadwinner and one
67.
by d1sxeyes 5mo ago
That's not a defence, that's a remedy.
68.
by d1sxeyes 5mo ago
It doesn’t help that Google has gone to shit though, and what used to be a simple Google search is now an enshittified embedded experience with an AI anyway.
69.
by d1sxeyes 5mo ago
Exactly. Even more true when contributions are not open: https://sqlite.org/copyright.html#:~:text=Open%2DSource%2C%2...
70.
by d1sxeyes 5mo ago
I did read between the lines here: > After that you essentially have to chuck it as you don’t get any updates from Apple and slowly you descend into incompatibility unless you world exists in browser. But I don't think the lines wer
71.
by d1sxeyes 5mo ago
It is yours for as long as you want it, and it (mostly) runs all the software it was compatible with when you first bought it (there are some quirks around software you had access to but didn't install, like Garageband, where you may n
72.
by d1sxeyes 6mo ago
Looks like you're talking about the new powers they got in 2018 https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A0%D0%BE%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%BE... But proper curial oversight stopped with the Lugovoi law in 2013, after which RKN cou
73.
by d1sxeyes 6mo ago
I remember writing about Roskomnadzor well before 2019, it’s existed at least since 2013, and don’t think it was particularly new then.
74.
by d1sxeyes 6mo ago
Tip: you can add a 'Phonetic' name to a contact, and Siri will try to use it. So you can do stuff like: Mieczysława -> Mee-etchiss-wahva Krzysztof -> Kzhyshtof Świętopełk -> Shvee-entoh-pehwk It's still a bit hit and
75.
by d1sxeyes 6mo ago
> if you can’t respect a boundary of not revealing source without projecting an imagined bad onto that, that’s just you, my dude, and I’m not responsible how you react at all I’m responding to the change , as something worth scrutiny. Y
76.
by d1sxeyes 6mo ago
I don’t think anything, and I’m not accusing you of anything, I’m just saying, a lot of folks started with pure motives and got poisoned along the way. For what it’s worth, it’s not very reassuring that you have a bunch of open source proje
77.
by d1sxeyes 6mo ago
No-one knows who you are, and you’re clearly not against using something like GH Actions in a way other than its intended purpose. What’s to say you won’t pivot to running a tiny VM on my machine and making it available to others?
78.
by d1sxeyes 6mo ago
While they don't sting, a 45cm long dragonfly would have some pretty gnarly mandibles, and could bite if it decided you were a threat. Probably wouldn't be much fun.
79.
by d1sxeyes 6mo ago
I didn't, but not sure what the point is. Maybe I missed something else?
80.
by d1sxeyes 6mo ago
Anna Karenina is public domain, assuming you’re talking about the original? If you translate it then maybe you could release it under GPL, but bit odd?
81.
by d1sxeyes 6mo ago
> for the most part I can think of like a small handful of places where i just symmetrically encrypt at rest Current best practices for symmetric encryption are considered PQ-safe (provided your key length is long enough). The real quest
82.
by d1sxeyes 6mo ago
So low not so slow
83.
by d1sxeyes 6mo ago
Basically the idea is use hybrid. AES-GCM-256 or ChaCha20-Poly1305 for symmetric encryption (which is already PQ-safe), and ML-KEM looks set to become the standard for key encapsulation. ML-KEM-768 is fast as an algorithm, faster than X2551
84.
by d1sxeyes 6mo ago
I don’t think the argument as a whole is a fallacy, it’s true that the exact cost to the NHS is more than covered by tax, but most estimates of wider cost to the economy (e.g. lost productivity, disability benefits, etc) is higher. https:
85.
by d1sxeyes 6mo ago
AEB is enabled even when FSD is off, which sounds like the L2 ADAS behaviour you're describing. Just because FSD disengages, it doesn't mean that no other Collision Avoidance Assist features are operating. > because FSD deactiv
86.
by d1sxeyes 6mo ago
Those are not Oxford commas, they’re parenthetical (and I like them too!)
87.
by d1sxeyes 6mo ago
To be fair, that report says > the self-driving feature had “aborted vehicle control less than one second prior to the first impact” It seems right to me that the self-driving feature aborts vehicle control as soon as it is in a situatio
88.
by d1sxeyes 6mo ago
While that’s true, translations often vary in terms of how faithful they are to the source vs how idiomatic they are in the target language. Take for example the French phrase “j’ai fait une nuit blanche”, which literally means “I did a whi
89.
by d1sxeyes 6mo ago
Can you point me to the part of the GDPR that gives you ownership of data that relates to you? I’m fairly confident that you are assigned rights over personal information as it relates to you, but it doesn’t assign ownership.
90.
by d1sxeyes 6mo ago
The data Flock holds is not owned by OP. If I as a photographer take a photograph of someone, the photo does not belong to that person—the photographer retains the IP and ownership rights. You have rights too, such as privacy/likenes

More ›