cyrusshepard

7 ms·

31.
by cyrusshepard 10y ago
Logical fallacy. Social status ≠ genetics. Social status is unfortunately often determined by income, race, religion, and a host of other nonlogical designations. In this experiment, social status was determined by "newness" to th
32.
by cyrusshepard 10y ago
All these navigation elements are secondary, and further down the page. You have a point that if the user wants to, they are free to click any link they want. The fact remains that the top-most, primary navigation element on an AMP page is
33.
by cyrusshepard 10y ago
Yes, accept our platform, design choices, and navigation framing or we won't put you in a competitive position with other search results. While AMP isn't a ranking factor (Google has stated this) AMP results are displayed more pro
34.
by cyrusshepard 10y ago
This is a good response and I appreciate Malte's effort to engage publishers, but it doesn't calm my nerves about the biggest publisher complaint about AMP: Google owns the chrome (top navigation) on all AMP pages. This makes it
35.
by cyrusshepard 12y ago
1. Excercise. The more variety, the better. Excercise supports nuerogenisis. 2. Proper diet. Can't believe how much smarter I became in my 40's when I actually started eating vegetables, seeds, nuts, leafy greens, fish, etc. 3. Sl
36.
by cyrusshepard 12y ago
I wholeheartedly see your point, but I believe the well-intentioned objective is to gain perspective from like-minded individuals who can empathize. Much like a support group. Depressed alcoholics share a common bond not only around depress
37.
by cyrusshepard 13y ago
A quick 2-minute check shows that yes, indeed the site violates Google guidelines. If you check the backlinks using any number of checkers (Open Site Explorer, Ahrefs, Majestic SEO) you can find a number of over-optimized 'unnatural&#x
38.
by cyrusshepard 13y ago
Perhaps not worthless, but his obvious conflict of interest should preferably been disclosed at the beginning of the article, and not in a footnote. In my mind, this severely damages the author's credibility.
39.
Mega-SERP: A Visual Guide to Google(moz.com)
1 points by cyrusshepard 13y ago|0 comments
40.
by cyrusshepard 13y ago
+1s and Google+ posts are two separate things. A Google+ post passes SEO benefits (through linking) independent of the number of +1s it has. So although Google doesn't use +1s directly, it does use the link signals found naturally in t
41.
by cyrusshepard 13y ago
Cyrus here (the author) Thanks Matt, I think we both agree that Google doesn't use +1's directly in your algorithm. But are you implying there are no SEO benefits to posting popular content on Google+? Google does use PageRank and
42.
What Company Culture IS and IS Not (moz.com)
15 points by cyrusshepard 14y ago|0 comments
43.
by cyrusshepard 15y ago
He killed it for sport, the rest is an excuse. If he were concerned about the community food supply he could have donated food. Anyone who hires "booth babes" for spokespeople and is a fan of 24 (a show I used to work for) hunts because he