Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
cyrksoft
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
21 ms
·
211.
▲
by
cyrksoft
7y ago
Does it violate the terms of use of the phone? iPhone, for example. If the terms make it clear you can't fix it outside their approved shops then there is no "right to repair". It's part of the contract you get into when
212.
▲
by
cyrksoft
7y ago
That will only push prices even higher. The cost will be pushed to the consumer, like every tax.
213.
▲
by
cyrksoft
7y ago
We know how the mortgage crisis went. Government isn’t a magical solution.
214.
▲
by
cyrksoft
7y ago
Can they use Airbnb and the likes to bypass this?
215.
▲
by
cyrksoft
7y ago
< less capitalist parts of Europe. If you want socialist paradise see Cuba, Venezuela and the rest of Latin America. Come live here and you’ll see how well it works. Government doesn’t have a special power with future vision, nobody does
216.
▲
by
cyrksoft
7y ago
The problem is they shouldn't be building stadiums either. You expect a lottery? So random luck will be the way to go.
217.
▲
by
cyrksoft
7y ago
So you'll force tax payers to pay for it? Government doesn't have free money. Why should people be forced to pay for the construction of such housing?
218.
▲
by
cyrksoft
7y ago
> Every city needs people who do lower paying jobs. Someone has to clean those office buildings, someone has to take care of sick people at hospitals, someone has to drive taxis, buses, ... By not supplying those people with affordable h
219.
▲
by
cyrksoft
7y ago
> Government should provide it for its citizens And how do you expect government to pay for that? How do you decide who lives in these houses? It's not that easy. Government isn't a magic entity.
220.
▲
by
cyrksoft
7y ago
Care to elaborate a bit more? Where’s the exploitation? Edit: typo
221.
▲
by
cyrksoft
7y ago
Big Media is dying and they are desperate to shut down competition. This is a political article and nothing more.
222.
▲
by
cyrksoft
7y ago
>And that's just the thing. Many, many people don't have time to shop around gathering a variety of high-quality news sources. Many will just run Fox, or CNN, or whatever as their primary news source. And that implicitly shapes
223.
▲
by
cyrksoft
7y ago
Then it's not a viable business. I subscribe to the papers I want. Tax payers shouldn't absorb their faulty business.
224.
▲
by
cyrksoft
7y ago
>My observation is that if you get information from only one source (or only sources of one ideology), and they repeat it over, and over, and over, you'll end up believing it - no matter how intelligent you are. Blind repetition is
225.
▲
by
cyrksoft
7y ago
What's the problem with that? Every news org receives money from companies or individuals with specific interests. You should be able to know what to read and how to read it. I don't think anybody takes Fox seriously (or at least
226.
▲
by
cyrksoft
7y ago
They should change their business plan. It's clearly not working anymore. Most newspapers in my country are basically dead and kept alive by government's money, ie, tax money. It would be ridiculous to expect a law to help them. T
227.
▲
by
cyrksoft
7y ago
What do you know what's right? To know what is right you need to see the future and I highly doubt anyone can. Let people decide by themselves. If they get in debt to study some "useless" degree it's their fault. The res
228.
▲
by
cyrksoft
7y ago
Free? Who pays?
229.
▲
by
cyrksoft
7y ago
Market share is different from monopoly. Apple is not the only phone manufacturer. There are many companies out there making phones. The fact that everybody likes or chooses them doesn’t mean they are a monopoly.
230.
▲
by
cyrksoft
7y ago
How do you define enough money? The fact that you don’t like it doesn’t mean you can get the government involved. Protest all you want, but that doesn’t give you the right to call for help from the government to enforce something because yo
231.
▲
by
cyrksoft
7y ago
Where do you see a monopoly? The fact that people choose it doesn’t make it a monopoly. Specially with that price tag. You can choose many other options. There is no real economic argument to call it a monopoly.
232.
▲
by
cyrksoft
7y ago
But YOU chose to buy the device. Nobody forced you to buy an Apple device.
233.
▲
by
cyrksoft
7y ago
There is no problem about jsnell posting that. I just want to know what all the complaints about Apple (Amazon, Google, etc) is about. Why would it be wrong for Apple to do everything jsnell predicts?
234.
▲
by
cyrksoft
7y ago
What's the problem about Apple doing that? It's their platform. You can go use whatever else you like, nobody forces you to use their system.