cybert00th

13 ms·

1. 121.▲
   by cybert00th 7y ago

   If the BBC isn't like Netflix then surely the way to sort this is to break it up into distinct companies that handle its disparate bits?
2. 122.▲
   by cybert00th 7y ago

   "He raises the question, will Sci-Hub prove the ultimate disruptor and bring down the existing status quo in scholarly communications?" I don't think so as, judging by the way things are going, OpenAccess will see to that. Di
3. 123.▲
   by cybert00th 7y ago

   I have a friend who has worked in US military black ops projects since at least the early '90s. And back in the mid '90s he told me there were aircraft being built and tested which had flight characteristics similar to those descr
4. 124.▲
   by cybert00th 7y ago

   >Elsevier is rent-collecting, not selling an intangible feeling Got it in one! And until that changes, the status quo remains - regardless of sites like schihub
5. 125.▲
   by cybert00th 7y ago

   > UC is determined to operate under an alternative model, in which researchers pay to have their papers published but not for subscriptions. Yep, slowly but surely OpenAccess is beginning to take hold. The UK publisher I work for has had
6. 126.▲
   by cybert00th 7y ago

   > There is some push to move to something like OpenAthens for all authentication/authorization Or shibboleth - we treat shib as a gateway to our auth service at this here journal publishing salt mine. Seems to work well enough - a