cwmoore

8 ms·

181.
by cwmoore 3mo ago
Nobody said they do that though? Weird comment from my perspective. They said they learn from them, not that they are effective references. I’m not buying the “us and them” or to each their own on this one, sight unseen. Do you have an exam
182.
by cwmoore 3mo ago
Enhance!
183.
by cwmoore 3mo ago
180?
184.
by cwmoore 3mo ago
People/politicians argue for more jobs, because arguing for more money generally goes nowhere. First comment was satire or sarcasm. Second one is I think what garnered downvotes, and said sincerely: TAX.THE.BOTS.FOR.UBI.NOW!
185.
by cwmoore 3mo ago
Mixed with a little synesthesia. It’s only natural.
186.
by cwmoore 3mo ago
Wish you’d been more specific, “a Jewish comedian” sounds like the setup for a joke.
187.
by cwmoore 3mo ago
I don’t think you’d get to use the courts anymore.
188.
by cwmoore 3mo ago
Justice is so rarely poetic.
189.
by cwmoore 3mo ago
I’ll say this with certainty, video is terrible reference material. Talk me through something the first time, sure, but if I need to look something up (yes, I know asking an LLM is available) I want a comprehensive subject guide, mostly in
190.
by cwmoore 3mo ago
sed -E “s/good\s//g”
191.
by cwmoore 3mo ago
Lower wages mean more jobs though, right? BTW, why don’t we tax the bots for UBI?
192.
by cwmoore 3mo ago
Thanks? for the obtrusive ads and the downvote? HN can do better.
193.
by cwmoore 3mo ago
temporary
194.
by cwmoore 3mo ago
Watching trees not move much is a low standard for proof—maybe you misunderstood the intent of my comment. If it isn’t upthread, the seminal research on the mechanism (Cohesion Tension Theory) is from 1894: https://www.jstor.org&
195.
by cwmoore 3mo ago
I can see leas than half of it. Imgur?
196.
by cwmoore 3mo ago
I like that yours is 45 rows of asterisks. Makes me think a project-and-rasterize pipeline, sampling a simplified world water boundary map under a variety of projection parameters should give you a range of bitmaps, and then it is up to who
197.
by cwmoore 3mo ago
So no single term, for something so widespread, must be taboo to talk about, or too risky to address, and threaten the social status of someone connected to the uglier side of a profession. Of course I didn’t “single out” anyone, but you go
198.
by cwmoore 3mo ago
I have seen trees before too, anecdotally, my random naysayer.
199.
by cwmoore 3mo ago
They do wave in the wind, and evolution is likely capturing some of that motion for work.
200.
by cwmoore 3mo ago
“The root cause is nailed down (not a theory anymore)…” —Claude
201.
by cwmoore 3mo ago
There’s a name for this right? Marketers that discredit free markets, lawyers that ruin the law, accountants w bank on loopholes, social services that thrive without a social safety net, the lobbyists of democracy, what else? Actual mercena
202.
by cwmoore 3mo ago
Or maybe: like a copywriter, paid by the dopamine hit
203.
by cwmoore 3mo ago
So it pulls exclamation marks. . .angle brackets maybe? “=“ <> “!=“
204.
by cwmoore 3mo ago
Makes sense—what’s their address?
205.
by cwmoore 3mo ago
Not to your critique, but from the quote, I’m alerted to the idea that filled-in-for-compliance is malicious compliance or non-compliance. I can’t imagine the frustration multiplier it must be. So much is frustrating enough on the intended
206.
by cwmoore 3mo ago
wonder what that app was for
207.
by cwmoore 3mo ago
“targeted and functional controls for accessing camera and microphone streams”
208.
by cwmoore 3mo ago
Notice I am not asking for an example. Anecdata of one, and for sure there are many, in isolation is—demonstrably—mostly PR.
209.
by cwmoore 3mo ago
>How is that difference measured? So it is personal attacks? Are you joking? Is there no gatekeeping of pools of money?
210.
by cwmoore 3mo ago
Eh? What else could communication be there for?

More ›