Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
cwalv
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
23 ms
·
271.
▲
by
cwalv
5y ago
Okay, but when I hear "homeless" I think "unsheltered". That's what it means in colloquial use.
272.
▲
by
cwalv
5y ago
The lack of feature parity on the sms side (poor quality videos, stupid text responses when ppl like something) is annoying .. but if you're ostracized because of the green bubble, that may turn out better for you anyway. My kids don&
273.
▲
by
cwalv
5y ago
> I also don’t see how signaling, in the UI, which messages are subject to different rules would be a anti-competitive I think the anti-competitive part is refusing to make iMessage available anywhere other than on apple products, even t
274.
▲
by
cwalv
5y ago
I had iphones from the 3G on up to about 2 years ago, when I thought I'd try android. I was surprised when group txt messages stopped working for me, even after I did whatever apple told me to do to disable iMessage after the fact. The
275.
▲
by
cwalv
5y ago
> But I guess as long as the buyers don't realize yet that their immutable ledger entry can become a dangling pointer in a puff of smoke, it doesn't matter. I was surprised too, but only for a moment. In the end it's basic
276.
▲
by
cwalv
5y ago
> but a competitor to Twitter cannot access the entire set of user data that Twitter has access to. True, but they could make it very easy for users to transfer all their data, which makes it possible if they could convince everyone to d
277.
▲
by
cwalv
5y ago
> Like the parent post, it's shocking to me the 180 that HN has done in this regard. Is it all of HN that's changed, or just this thread? There are probably a lot of ppl commenting on this article that don't bother to comm
278.
▲
by
cwalv
5y ago
> "Come to us, we represent a new free and open society unencumbered by stodgy authorities!". I don't pay a lot of attention to the complaints, so I could be wrong, but it seems like when ppl complain about Twitter they&#x
279.
▲
by
cwalv
5y ago
> Don't get me wrong, I see the appeal and fell for CF early on but not a fan anymore since they've grown into such a behemoth. > Absolutely power corrupts absolutely. This seems to capture the gist of the argument clearly.
280.
▲
by
cwalv
5y ago
> Then something changed for me, I went to a party and actually tried to talk to people. I approached it like the challenge of learning a new skill or technology. This is pretty inspiring/challenging. > Why go home and read a boo
281.
▲
by
cwalv
5y ago
This blows my mind. I thought excel had "save as -> html". Whether it does or not, nice work finding this niche
282.
▲
by
cwalv
5y ago
This kindof reminds me of the ipython display protocol https://carreau.github.io/posts/29-JupyterCon-DisplayProtoco...
283.
▲
by
cwalv
5y ago
I think there are Christian artists who could make it in the mainstream, but who focus on Christian themes out of devotion/passion, in spite of the smaller audience.
284.
▲
by
cwalv
5y ago
I agree. I think part of the reason for this is that Typescript's type system was created with a goal of expressing the APIs of many existing js APIs, and many of those APIs are designed without any real constraint imposed by the type
285.
▲
by
cwalv
5y ago
I would guess they mean it's full duplex
286.
▲
by
cwalv
5y ago
How does it compare to natural immunity from a "breakthrough infection"? If risk of hospitalization is low and following immunity is stronger, that seems relevant to whether we some should get booster shots, esp when so many haven
287.
▲
by
cwalv
5y ago
Why do they want to avoid thinking about it? It seems like the parent is saying they wish they could think about it more, but it's ambiguous to the point of meaninglessness.
288.
▲
by
cwalv
5y ago
I think they're saying that it's hard to see why it matters or is interesting intrinsically (i.e., if you didn't get any advantage by claiming some heritage, why else do you care?). Personally, I still find it interesting, bu
289.
▲
by
cwalv
5y ago
I sympathize with both points of view. I think of autotools as an extreme example of how less general tools tend to grow in complexity to the point that the effort to learn them outweighs the benefit you get from knowing them well. But ther
290.
▲
by
cwalv
5y ago
> Performing an interview is a different skill from writing code. I think this is true for the day-long leetcode interviews, but to succeed as an engineer, even at the entry level, I think you need to be able to talk through how you woul
291.
▲
by
cwalv
5y ago
Sometimes it's easier to use tools you know will be available than to ensure your tool of choice will be available everywhere you need it to be. JavaScript, esp. pre v6, is another example that makes almost no sense when you ignore its
292.
▲
by
cwalv
5y ago
Graalvm native image has the ability to target llvm with a goal of making it easier "to target a new architecture without having to implement a complete new backend for Native Image." https://www.graalvm.org/refere
293.
▲
by
cwalv
6y ago
I'd like to learn more about the architectures and techniques developed over the last decade for this; can you recommend a few links or keywords to search?
294.
▲
by
cwalv
6y ago
Maybe something simpler like a stun/turn server would be enough. Or something with no infrastructure (or recurring fees) at all, only working in my local network (like my printer).
295.
▲
by
cwalv
6y ago
Kind of, yes. You don't have to learn very much about law to realize that trying to codify/define everything to the extreme is a fool's errand, so we just punt and leave it up to "a jury of your peers".
296.
▲
by
cwalv
6y ago
I guess that depends on how you define "understand." There are many things I understand that I would have a hard time explaining to someone else, much less defining them. Most people who have spent enough time to master something
297.
▲
by
cwalv
6y ago
Maybe a better distinction is how some things are "hard to define" but "easy to understand".
298.
▲
by
cwalv
6y ago
> Science is where almost nothing is proven. Most findings are mutable, preliminary and incomplete. This may be debatable, but seems to accurately describe what most academics call "science". The more common understanding is wh
299.
▲
by
cwalv
6y ago
> True, but the problem is that religion can not be questioned, changed or reasoned with in any meaningful way. Religious teachings can be questioned and reasoned about. Prevalent understanding and interpretations of scripture also chang
300.
▲
by
cwalv
6y ago
Maybe the feeling of inferiority is really just an appreciation for the contributions of the other "tribes", which I'd argue makes you able to "cross tribal lines"
More ›