cvalka

20 ms·

271.
by cvalka 4y ago
Your website is broken, not Chrome.
272.
by cvalka 4y ago
No, obviously, not with bullshit claims.
273.
by cvalka 4y ago
Truth does not matter to your mission.
274.
by cvalka 4y ago
Why is the DMCA even relevant here? Who's the copyright holder?
275.
by cvalka 4y ago
You must be delusional to cite Steve Ballmer. Steve had cost Microsoft a couple of hundreds billions of dollars.
276.
by cvalka 4y ago
https://openwrt.org/docs/guide-user/installation/openwrt-as-...
277.
by cvalka 4y ago
"3 - Don't enforce any laws. After all, shoplifting is a victimless crime. People need to eat and they need medicine. It's not against the law to be poor." Shoplifting is a victimless crime? Wtf?
278.
by cvalka 4y ago
There's no expectation of privacy in public places.
279.
by cvalka 4y ago
Use whatsapp messages instead!
280.
by cvalka 4y ago
Not really. It's an artifact of contract law. Could you give an example that is not a byproduct of a contractual provision?
281.
by cvalka 4y ago
This law will not survive the 1st amendment challenge. The unanswered question is what the limits are to out of state state power? It's a billion dollar question. What are the limits to a state enforcing its power out of state?
282.
by cvalka 4y ago
No, it's not a hack against the 1st amendment. Any private party action is constrained by the 1ST amendment. It's a well resolved question. The unanswered question is what the limits are to out of state state power? It's a bi
283.
by cvalka 4y ago
You, sir, are completely delusional. Obscenity is NOT pornography. The case law says so. Instead of correcting your falsities, you persist in your delusions. Your "interpretation" of the 14th amendment is radical, not supported by
284.
by cvalka 4y ago
I've never abandoned it. Why pay for that crap if you can pay put.io?
285.
by cvalka 4y ago
Hobbies are overrated. Arguing politics on the Internet is another hobby.
286.
by cvalka 4y ago
You don't believe in freedom of thought or speech. Period.
287.
by cvalka 4y ago
You read something somewhere but it's clear you're clueless when it comes to the US constitutional law. The first paragraph seems to be written by GPT-3. The second paragraph contains one outright false statement and another state
288.
by cvalka 4y ago
1. Your idea compelling the websites to provide the header will survive the 1st amendment scrutiny. I support this. 2. Your idea compelling the client software to respect the header will probably not survive the 1st amendment and is not rea
289.
by cvalka 4y ago
No. The Trump's ban was drafted by morons bypassing the regular rule making process. The non-application to green card holders was almost immediately enacted not because of the "protests" but for the reason of having a 0% cha
290.
by cvalka 4y ago
Why limit to housing? What about shares of a company?
291.
by cvalka 4y ago
Watching porn is a natural part of growing up. It's almost unavoidable.
292.
by cvalka 4y ago
No. But it's unconstitutional to require an id to get a book.
293.
by cvalka 4y ago
100%
294.
by cvalka 4y ago
This is clearly unconstitutional.
295.
by cvalka 4y ago
Most of them allow to select exit nodes.
296.
by cvalka 4y ago
So you don't believe in freedom of speech. Got it. Google should not exist and other great ideas.
297.
by cvalka 4y ago
Where's your github repo and how does your project compare to restic/borg?
298.
by cvalka 4y ago
2FA for payments.
299.
by cvalka 4y ago
2FA
300.
by cvalka 4y ago
BS. Too many people write too many books. See the Brandolini's law.

More ›