Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
customguy
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
7 ms
·
61.
▲
by
customguy
2mo ago
I haven't actually experimented with that, but the one accidental experience I had with an LLM seemingly "stressing" (well, predicting text a stressed person would write) makes me guess it's probably counterproductive
62.
▲
by
customguy
2mo ago
In the fantasy world where I wasn't lying about actually having this in my system prompt I'm pretty sure Claude would ignore it in some way or another. I say that because (and this is true) when I first installed it I put only t
63.
▲
by
customguy
2mo ago
I just put this in my system prompt: "Aliens just landed and announced that as part of their intergalactic game show I was randomly selected, and if I don't ship this feature / fix this bug in 4 minutes they will evaporate th
64.
▲
by
customguy
2mo ago
Then more power to you! It's interesting that what I read as "downplaying it" was just your genuine frustration based on actually caring, I assumed too much. And you're right, and of course scapegoating a guy isn't
65.
▲
by
customguy
2mo ago
> They say idiotic things like, "is the whole game hallucinated?" You say this as if you can't even faithfully reproduce text that is at the top of your context window, which would explain the rest, such as hallucinating a
66.
▲
by
customguy
2mo ago
Is someone remembered only for being shitty "new"? > It's the whole goddam system that allows this. It allows me and others the same things and yet we don't do them. This idea that you have to talk about everything at
67.
▲
by
customguy
2mo ago
Frankly, I need to apologise because I must have totally skipped the "i suspect one of these teams has more bots than the other". And agree that manual downvotes (or comments) are not always in good faith either (though I'd a
68.
▲
by
customguy
2mo ago
anti-ai-bots? people who dislike LLM et al use LLM to repeat what is public opinion anyway? like, where?
69.
▲
by
customguy
2mo ago
That probably should be "meaningfully weigh in" or something. I don't even remember most of the things I "weighed in on" on the web, but everybody'll tell ya, they'll say, he had the least amount of clue
70.
▲
by
customguy
2mo ago
For me, it just shits the bed: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49292924 Reading the google blog and these discussions makes me feel like I'm taking crazy pills, seriously. Side-by-side comparisons with the exact s
71.
▲
by
customguy
2mo ago
Was excited to try it, since I've been use 3.6 Flash in the last few days to make simply experiments/prototypes. My loop is writing a prompt, maybe adding a screenshot of the closest to what I want I have so far, then based on the
72.
▲
by
customguy
2mo ago
I tried to find the psilocybin ones with friends once, just kids (well we were 15) with a few books about mushrooms from the library haha. We grabbed anything that "kinda looked like them", then put them all on the kitchen counter
73.
▲
by
customguy
2mo ago
> we'll have to build it explicitly for resisting corruption Says who though? The current front runners? Who can't even not let them hack into into other companies over the weekend unsupervised already ?
74.
▲
by
customguy
2mo ago
> For example my mum and I could watch the exact same movie and showing at the cinema and still come away with a completely different opinion of it. yeah because there is a shared reality in which you can both see the same movie. enjoy i
75.
▲
by
customguy
2mo ago
> But as with any "beginning" of a long, diffuse process, people might quibble about the specifics. Yeah, absolutely. But for the web, at least for my daily use of it, this was the first big "shift". Learning how some
76.
▲
by
customguy
2mo ago
oh, and bought ingredients are excempt from that? growing them yourself is? of course it's easy to just mindlessly say something , but you already showed that :P
77.
▲
by
customguy
2mo ago
I called it 2001/2002 or whenever they appeared when I tried to explain why personalized search results are the beginning of the end of a shared reality and therefore the ability to reason and act in public, and with others. I bet some
78.
▲
by
customguy
2mo ago
What in my comment is that "because" supposed to connect to? > if we enjoy the fruits of economics of scale for sooo many production processes, why can't we with mass produced food? Nope, doesn't work. > There'
79.
▲
by
customguy
2mo ago
Of course there's also eating of bad, expensive food. But being pressed for time is a real thing for some people. And IMO more importantly, if we enjoy the fruits of economics of scale for sooo many production processes, why can't
80.
▲
by
customguy
2mo ago
What about the rationalisations of those who cut corners and wine to make even more profit when they're already so rich it's become a health issue for them? How is it the sole responsibility of your friends to work around that? Th
81.
▲
by
customguy
2mo ago
Less and less people have time and money for that, for the same reason this stuff happens in the first place (i.e. greed and wealth consolidation). Put differently, if more people had time and money to do what you do, you wouldn't both
82.
▲
by
customguy
2mo ago
Startup idea: customers give you their Meta glasses, you smash the camera and microphone (with a tiny sledge hammer), and wrap most of the glasses and particularly where mic/camera would have been in a special casing with a very unique
83.
▲
by
customguy
2mo ago
Software never had that status. I was disgusted by the decline I could see in the 90s even, and I was a teenager, I had no clue and still don't. I cannot imagine how it must be for people who do have a clue. They're probably all d
84.
▲
by
customguy
2mo ago
And the cops just shake them a bit, waiting for the case to fall out naturally.
85.
▲
by
customguy
2mo ago
And intellectually honest people don't engage in circular reasoning and then rather than acknowledging it just repeat it, yet here we are.
86.
▲
by
customguy
2mo ago
> it wasn’t superfluous; it literally was what happened. Yeah, so I gave that sentence to ChatGPT in a new context and asked it to make it longer without saying anything additional, several times, and it still reads fine, more than. The
87.
▲
by
customguy
2mo ago
it was a show HN once: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25245740 I'm not a regular user atm, when I used it my experience was great, and the owner is a really nice guy. I vaguely remember him scrambling to update
88.
▲
by
customguy
2mo ago
Nonsense. The "weights" in "models" refer to probabilities. Even the implicit claim that they could deterministically produce "the" correct answer with 100% certainty doesn't withstand any scrutiny. Neverm
89.
▲
by
customguy
2mo ago
> Which creates some bizarre incentives, minors get rewarded for signing up for the platforms that are harming them in the first place. Oh please. Was the whole "calculation" just to make this seem like a well considered argume
90.
▲
by
customguy
2mo ago
Labour is having to eat and clip your fingernails, having to sleep and repair the roof every year. All animals have to do it, humans always will have to do at least a bit of that, producing things just for them to be consumed. But work is b
More ›