cush

5 ms·

31.
by cush 1mo ago
There’s actually a potential dark future where even this 10x ascension itself would mark the end of humanity. Humans would be the Homo sapiens who remain at 1x, and those who can access and afford to be 10x eventually split off into a new s
32.
by cush 1mo ago
They already influence people to do things that we wouldn’t otherwise
33.
by cush 1mo ago
I'd make completely different assumptions
34.
by cush 1mo ago
Now walk through exactly what would happen when those lazy people follow this approach… You see the issue right?
35.
by cush 1mo ago
Oh great so you’re saying they’ve independently decided to take on the persona of the killer robots from our sci-fi novels. Very reassuring
36.
by cush 1mo ago
Billionaires don’t pay taxes, they receive tax breaks.
37.
by cush 1mo ago
As soon as they started referring to themselves as “we” and “The Swarm” they should have pulled the plug
38.
by cush 1mo ago
> The result covers Perplexity only. We have not measured ChatGPT, Gemini, Copilot or Google’s AI Mode Why only test Perplexity...? Isn't it the least popular among these?
39.
by cush 1mo ago
Finally we have a fish in the basket!!
40.
by cush 1mo ago
I was disappointed to see the new web popover api doesn't have this basic usability feature built in
41.
by cush 1mo ago
Hmm it’s almost as if people are paying good money for iCloud+ or something. They aren’t google and shouldn’t be retiring their services as if they’re giving them away for free
42.
by cush 2mo ago
I wonder if devs are flocking to TUIs to gatekeep against normies building apps
43.
by cush 2mo ago
Wouldn't it be up to huggingface to press charges?
44.
by cush 2mo ago
It would be shocking to you if in a market with many competing sellers would there be price competition such that those sellers are operating at a loss? If you’re trying to get me to argue that every seller is operating at a loss, I don’t k
45.
by cush 2mo ago
> How do we know inference is heavily subsidized? Balance sheets > Are all these third party Chinese model providers subsidizing the true cost? It could be argued the subidies are even heavier than American model providers as the pric
46.
by cush 2mo ago
They literally control the feedback loop...
47.
by cush 2mo ago
I could still tab behind the dialog
48.
by cush 2mo ago
It’s way too early to tell the true cost of intelligence. Inference is still heavily subsidized, and training is apparently being funded by a mountain of free money
49.
by cush 2mo ago
> This isn't really anyone's fault in a simple sense Or, in a more simple sense it’s entirely Google’s fault
50.
by cush 2mo ago
It's weird that the pure html dialog still doesn't handle inertness yet
51.
by cush 2mo ago
Models can easily do multiple passes
52.
by cush 2mo ago
That is categorically untrue. Professional Engineers not only face consequences, they are personally liable for the work they put their stamp on, and they can lose their license
53.
by cush 2mo ago
Because Engineering is an incredibly rigorous discipline and title that requires so much work to obtain. It’s like a massage therapist calling themself a doctor. Computer Science isn’t Engineering.
54.
by cush 2mo ago
That’s because most Software Engineers aren’t Engineers, they’re computer science majors. It’s a completely different discipline.
55.
by cush 2mo ago
Because it is
56.
by cush 2mo ago
An approach like C2PA is the only realistic path forward. If the trajectory we're on continues, it's probably safe to assume nearly all content will be AI generated. We need realistic ways to prove content is human generated, and
57.
by cush 2mo ago
No it isn’t. If it was you’d be charged per update not per month.
58.
by cush 2mo ago
These types of costs exist for any business. It’s called overhead, and I done care. Profit doesn’t equal revenue for any business, and it’s the developer’s responsibility to charge enough to cover their costs. If they can’t do that without
59.
by cush 2mo ago
This is hardly convincing. A $99/yr fee and a once every 2 years update doesn't warrant a monthly subscription fee from every user. Eg a $9.99 app could cover those costs with a few dozen downloads
60.
by cush 2mo ago
By that logic they should charge per photo

More ›